A federal judge told US House and Senate Democrats they can begin collecting financial evidence this week about Donald Trump's businesses for a lawsuit.
Judge Emmet Sullivan, of the US District Court in Washington, denied an attempt by the Justice Department to stop the Democrats from collecting information from the Trump Organization and to appeal early court decisions in the lawsuit, which tests the constitutionality of Trump's business holdings while he serves as President.
The case is one of several avenues Democrats have to get to Trump's financial records.
Sullivan said the group of more than 200 members can begin collecting evidence June 28 through late September. Previously, the members of Congress said they plan to seek both documents and depositions from the Trump Organization.
But the Justice Department had hoped to take the case to an appeals court before the evidence collection began.
Well,, it looks like Team Trump lost another battle. The collection of data can procede.. although I am sure the republicans will try to appeal it
Judge says Democrats can begin collecting Trump financial records in emoluments suit - CNNPolitics
Well,, it looks like Team Trump lost another battle. The collection of data can procede.. although I am sure the republicans will try to appeal it
Judge says Democrats can begin collecting Trump financial records in emoluments suit - CNNPolitics
Well, I guess we'll have to see what happens as a result.
It will also be interesting to see what happens to the next Dem who sits in the White House. The "return the favor" is going to be awesome.
path of no return.
they spied on Trump and now they will investigate to find a crime....Dems are just digging bigger hole to fall into....Trump is clean
path of no return.
they spied on Trump and now they will investigate to find a crime....Dems are just digging bigger hole to fall into....Trump is clean
He is as pure as the driven snow.
Well, I guess we'll have to see what happens as a result.
It will also be interesting to see what happens to the next Dem who sits in the White House. The "return the favor" is going to be awesome.
IIRC, there are two separate Emoluments Clause lawsuits against Trump.
amazing ain't it....Obama had his Tax returns for 8 years and nothing leaked....you know when Donald was a birther:lol:
amazing ain't it....Obama had his Tax returns for 8 years and nothing leaked....you know when Donald was a birther:lol:
So what?
Obama didn't have to worry about leaked ax documents since he released 16 years of tax returns.
Presidential Tax Returns | Presidential Candidates Taxes - Tax Notes
Post #8 and ya have to go to Obama. Can't defend your own guy.
Pretty pathetic.
missed my point
Obama Administration had access to Trumps Tax returns with Lara Lerner(Tax Spy) could have leaked them if there was dirt
The conspiracy theory forum is that way. -------->
keep up I was defending our guy
keep up I was defending our guy
Why, no matter who is in the white house, I think it is good to have transparency into that person's finances. I don't care where who's in there.
There's no law that says Trump should comply with what you think...
Post #8 and ya have to go to Obama. Can't defend your own guy.
Pretty pathetic.
No modern president except Trump has refused financial transparency.
By referring to Obama? SAD!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?