• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Dismisses kari kake's Final Claim In Election Loss For Arizona Governor

Liberal7360

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
7,292
Reaction score
11,782
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
The final court case is done.

The judge dismissed the case because she had no evidence of her claims. She had no evidence of her claims. Just like trump.

This went on for way too long.

She might run for senator next year, I hope she does. She will have a spectacular loss which will be fun to watch.

It's good to see judges in our courts honestly uphold the law.

Judge dismisses Kari Lake's final claim in election loss for Arizona governor

While most other 2020 election deniers around the country conceded after losing their own races last November, the defeated GOP candidate for Arizona governor did not.
www.aol.com
 
This case hinged on the question of whether the county "verified signatures" or not. Lake's contention was that the verification process was so lax that, effectively, signature verification didn't happen. The judge's ruling appears to be that as long as a process was in place it doesn't matter whether that process was effective or not. It's like if the law says "separate the red balls from the blue balls" and you have a bucket with 1000 assorted balls so you pick 10 red balls, set them aside and leave the rest mixed together. Did you satisfy the instruction or not? This judge says that you satisfied the instruction. Case closed.
 

The problem for people telling themselves things they want to believe which are are not true is when the law separates the facts from the BS.
 

It's a conspiracy to victimize Trumpists and white middle class christian males, who we all know are the greatest victims in the history of victimhood.








Reality

She is a lying piece of shit Trumpist who gambled that she could win by appealing to lying piece of shit election-denying Trumpists, and it failed. Having appealed to swine, she couldn't backtrack. So we got this stupid ongoing court show, which failed like Trump's 60+ lawturds. That's all.

 
First of all, this isn't "the final court case". You can be sure that Lake will appeal.

Second, the judge dismissed using tortured logic. Even though there was ample evidence presented by the plaintiff that the verification process was not followed and that hundreds of thousands of ballots were not properly verified, the judge ignored the evidence and said that, since there was testimony that some of the people verified signatures properly, that means that the mail in ballot system is secure. This totally ignores the people who did not verify signatures properly.

“Ms. Onigkeit’s testimony makes abundantly clear that level one and level two signature review did take place in some fashion.”​

LOL!! "in some fashion". Notice the judge didn't say the review took place "according to law".

shrug...

Nothing new here, folks. Corrupt judge = corrupt ruling.
 

Her case was entirely speculative. Nothing changed in the process of signature verification. Kari Lake or Trump can tell themselves a wrong thing all they like. They can convince as many wanna-believers as they like. That does not change the facts. She had no basis to show that the signatures were not valid. She can BS herself. She can BS other people. She can BS some people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but she cannot BS all the people all the time.

It doesn't matter whether she sincerely believes a wrong thing. That does not make a false thing true. She can convince herself the sky is green if she likes. But the sky will still be blue. And so was the Arizona governor election outcome.
 
Question: when was the last time that a Trumpist lost an election, or a court case that wasn't the result of a rigged system/cheating/biased judge?

Has it ever happened?
 
 
Question for those supporting Kari Lake.
What if Kari Lake had won the general election. If the process is so flawed how could Arizona voters know that Lake won?

The judge made the correct ruling. Lake lost.

Interesting the GOP candidates like Lake did not complain when they won or they use the bs of we won despite the corruption.
Still waiting for her to provide the "evidence" of fraud in the GOP Primary. The claim she made before the primary election even started.
As soon as she won, crickets.

ps. GOP wrote the Arizona election laws.
 
Last edited:
Since your opinion appears to be so set in stone, perhaps you'd care to explain the mechanism involved in this alleged fraud.
For example: ballots are sent to individual voters homes. Exactly how are these mail in ballots stolen by the fraudsters?
Also, hundreds of thousands of mail in ballots not arriving at their individual voters homes would have been noticed. But that didn't happen. So, logically, there's no viable mechanism for doing what has been irrationally claimed was done.
 
0 for 2022
 
Buckeyes85 said:
Question: when was the last time that a Trumpist lost an election, or a court case that wasn't the result of a rigged system/cheating/biased judge?

Has it ever happened?
Click to expand...
No.
 
mike2810 said:
Question for those supporting Kari Lake.
What if Kari Lake had won the general election. If the process is so flawed how could Arizona voters know that Lake won?
Click to expand...
She didn't contend in her lawsuit that she won. She contended that the election should be vacated...which means the election should be re-held.

mike2810 said:
The judge made the correct ruling. Lake lost.
Click to expand...
The judge did not make the correct ruling and his ruling had nothing to do with deciding whether she won or lost.

Irrelevant deflection...rejected.

mike2810 said:
ps. GOP wrote the Arizona election laws.
Click to expand...
And corrupt Maricopa County election officials disregarded the law.
 
Corrupt REPUBLICAN judge? That's right, no matter who you are, or your affiliation, if you go against the big lie, you're corrupt!
There was no compelling evidence of the claim to overturn the results, period. This matters to those of us who are concerned about the law, and the continuing proven lies from the radical right. You're witnessing the system working, which is bad news for pathological lying losers.
 
Did I misstate what the arguments and opinion were?
 
Perhaps you'd care to explain the mechanism involved in this alleged fraud.
For example: ballots are sent to individual voters homes. Exactly how are these mail in ballots stolen by the fraudsters?
Also, hundreds of thousands of mail in ballots not arriving at their individual voters homes would have been noticed. But that didn't happen. So, logically, there's no viable mechanism for doing what has been irrationally claimed was done.
 
Her case was not speculative. It was based on testimonial, video and statistical evidence that the process outlined in law could not have been completed effectively enough to satisfy a strict reading of the statute. If this same level of scrutiny were to be applied to banking, for example, and people were allowed to withdraw funds from bank accounts with only a cursory check of their signature to verify their identity would you consider that "verifying the signature"?
 
Buckeyes85 said:
Ok, a republican has never lost an election fair and square, but you are not a conspiracy theorist?
Click to expand...
Not since 2020...not republicans who matter.

And no, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I am a factual realist.
 
Mycroft said:
She didn't contend in her lawsuit that she won. She contended that the election should be vacated...which means the election should be re-held.
Click to expand...
Does not address the question I asked:
"What if Kari Lake had won the general election. If the process is so flawed how could Arizona voters know that Lake won?

Mycroft said:
The judge did not make the correct ruling and his ruling had nothing to do with deciding whether she won or lost.
Click to expand...
we will disagree. The judge made the correct ruling based on Arizona election laws.
Mycroft said:
Irrelevant deflection...rejected.
Click to expand...
funny
Mycroft said:
And corrupt Maricopa County election officials disregarded the law.
Click to expand...
Pretty strong statement. Prove that the Maricopa County election officials are corrupt.
if not, it is just your bs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…