- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
- Messages
- 25,766
- Reaction score
- 23,377
- Location
- PNW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Here's the original claim that Judge Cannon relied on. See if YOU can make sense of it. (They didn't even state a basis for the Motion.)I guess I should have read Trump's sloppy original motion first. I'm sure it was a peach of a pleading.
And I take it the overarching, or central claim is that everything seized that is either personal, attorney client privileged material, or subject to the faux post presidential term executive privilege, should be returned to him?
Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading
(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
Last edited: