• Please keep all posts on the Rittenhouse verdict here: Rittenhouse Verdict. Note the moderator warnings in the thread. The thread will be heavily moderated with a zero tolerance policy for any baiting, flaming, trolling or other rule breaks. Stick to the topic and not the other posters. Thank you.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Johnson: We Would Be Polling at 20% if Included on “Top Line” of Polls

Glen Contrarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,688
Reaction score
8,046
Location
Bernie to the left of me, Hillary to the right, he
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
How the cognative bias of social proof is disadvantaging Gary Johnson
Johnson: We Would Be Polling at 20% if Included on "Top Line" of Polls

Um, no, I don't think so...unless the party affiliation were also removed from the names on the polls.

Personally, I could never vote for the party of Ayn Rand. Libertarianism is the polar opposite of communism...and is every bit as incompatible with human nature on the macro scale. Sure, it would work on a small scale with a group of like-minded people, but - like communism - is not designed to allow for people who don't have the kind of mindset that libertarianism demands.
 
Top Bottom