Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
ShamMol said:The toad case has been cited as precedent before and it is an example of one of the cases that might come up before him-so he should know at least how to answer. And Navy, why don't you respond to my post...just a suggestion, I responded to yours.
I agree with you about Schumer and that pissed me off, but not as much as the Repubs not asking serious questions...with the exception of Spector who did a great line of reasoning on abortion.
anyone who is seriously up for the Supreme court gets coached extensively and Roberts and Ginsburg are no exceptions...anyone who says anything else is lying.
I seem to remember the Repubs asking questions as well of Roberts that he declined to answer because they might come up, so are they hypocrites as well? No? Didn't think so.
We will see in the next election, but it honestly had nothing to do with this thread and I will ask why you put it there other than to satisfy your own need to feel superior.
You have to understand the process.........When democrats back a nominee they give him softball questions........When Republicans back a nominee they give him softball questions..........The Republicans want Roberts to be confirmed...........
We will see in the next election, but it honestly had nothing to do with this thread and I will ask why you put it there other than to satisfy your own need to feel superior.[/
So are you advocating censorship in that one can only post here what you approve of?