Labour shortages obviously have a substantial impact on a nation's economic health. The US birthrate dropped 4% in 2020, a new record. Without an increase in immigration you're going to continue to see these types of jobs leaving the US for places with better labour availability.Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
I hate to see the jobs go, but the economics are sound.Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
Yes the plan failed. That being said it was mainly aimed at China. It might be interesting to debate why the plan failed. However we would get bogged down in Trump this or that versus why the U.S. has a problem with implementing long term strategy with politicians who think short term and presidents who have 4 years.Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
Yes, the short sighted anti immigration people are not very bright. I doubt they will figure it out either.Labour shortages obviously have a substantial impact on a nation's economic health. The US birthrate dropped 4% in 2020, a new record. Without an increase in immigration you're going to continue to see these types of jobs leaving the US for places with better labour availability.
Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
If the sole concern is available workers, then sure. However, once you get into the process of comparing operating costs and where you save money in that regard, then moving to Mexico makes more sense.Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
Ah ... a race to the bottom.It's a simple matter to bring all sorts of jobs back to the good old United States of America. Here's how to do it. [Republicans, pay attention. Here's your 2024 platform.]
1. Exempt returning businesses from all, repeat, all environmental regulations.
2. Exempt returning businesses from work safety regulations.
3. Give the returning businesses tax-free status.
4. Eliminate wage, hour and child labor laws so that American workers can legally work for $3/day.
Er, th-th-that's all, folks!
Regards, stay safe 'n well 'n remember the Big 5.
It’s more of a Right Wing utopiaI don't know why more liberals don't move to Mexico
I don't know why more liberals don't move to Mexico
Ah ... a race to the bottom.
Yeah, that ought'a work.
Health care costs now outweigh salary for lower wage workers. $30K annual in insurance premiums to pay for a family plan to cover a guy/gal making $30k per year will crush competitiveness.If the sole concern is available workers, then sure. However, once you get into the process of comparing operating costs and where you save money in that regard, then moving to Mexico makes more sense.
As was his sarcastic point.Ah ... a race to the bottom.
Yeah, that ought'a work.
Some sort of corroborating evidence of your anecdotal personal story would be nice. Anything we could link to for more actual information?Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
Yep. Often people focus on salaries, but when you look at the full compensation package it's a whole different picture; healthcare being the other major cost. It also becomes problematic for smaller businesses because they're competing with larger ones which can offer better plans at lower cost.Health care costs now outweigh salary for lower wage workers. $30K annual in premiums to pay for a family plan to cover a guy/gal making $30k per year will crush competitiveness.
this has been playing out over the last half century. Companies moving overseas or to Mexico due to less regulations and cheaper labor costs. It became where it was cheaper to ship the good from China or Mexico or somewhere else than have them made in the states. This isn't new. This is one reason we now have a service economy instead of an industrial one.Trump failed to reshore jobs. As a result, we landed a $2m project to strip a series of assembly lines out of a plant in Missouri, refurbish a few robots and send the whole thing to Mexico. Why?
There are three stories. Maybe all three played a part..
1. The plant was recently sued due to hazardous work conditions. The judgement against them approached $30M. They are appealing.
2. Costs: It’s simply cheaper to build in Mexico than it is in Missouri.
3. People: They can’t find enough labor in Missouri. This may be true or it may be a matter of cost. Either way, there is no shortage of workers in Mexico.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
🖐 Hey, hey 34!Hi, MamboDervish!
The Republicans, with such devices as 'right to work' and other laws, have been attempting to do that for years.
Health care costs now outweigh salary for lower wage workers. $30K annual in insurance premiums to pay for a family plan to cover a guy/gal making $30k per year will crush competitiveness.
IMO, this is a horrible outcome for the US from what is likely a sound business decision by said company. Logistics are a nightmare but lower costs and less legal hassles makes a move like this worthwhile for corporations.
I’m just glad that I’ll manage this project from my office in Ohio and not be one of the guys doing all the work in Mexico. The team will sleep in Texas and commute by bus to the plant every day for about a month to complete this task.
On failed Trumpism: We probably should have just let more Mexicans come up here rather than ship more of our jobs down there. Seems to me that would have been logical. No?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?