Devil505
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,512
- Reaction score
- 315
- Location
- Masschusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I think that moniker is best applied to those claiming the racism. Others state that there isn't enough evidence to say that this comment was motivated by racism.
That's because it's a true and correct defense.
Total bullsh1t. The above statement is enough to tell me that you haven't got the first clue what you are talking about and all the rest that will follow is a kneejerk, emotional tirade that I have no interest in indulging.
Oh look, jallman, a saviour has once again come to your rescue.
Maybe he can tell us all about how pious the Confederate flag is.
:roll:
1) "Thats because it's a true and correct defense."
I'm not going to waste my time with you after this post.
Never defended slavery. You are a liar.
Oh, joy . . . another one who takes a single statement and makes wild, completely unrelated and unsupported assumptions about the person who made it.
Sadly typical. What do they teach in schools these days about logic and reason?
How dare you.
Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.
Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
For two posts now, you have defended the culture in which slavery was rooted as an institution, masking your feelings in some wacky "States Rights" defense.
You did defend slavery.
Absolutely disgusting.
How dare you.
How dare you run away from legitimate points in the debate.
If you cared about racism, it would stand to reason you care about these incidents of racism that actually have proof :
LOL at it was about "States Rights!"
Where do these people come up with this stuff?
:rofl
Not worth the time.
Not worth the time.
It's becoming apparent that it's all you know how to do.
Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.
Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
I don't think he's a moron. He is a very bright fellow actually. But, he's one of those people who becomes more and more opinionated and extreme as he ages. And, he IS aging, he's now 85 years old, and is probably starting to slip.
You know what? If you don't like it, go to the mods and complain. :shrug:
And no, I did not defend slavery. You, sir, continue to lie. It's becoming apparent that it's all you know how to do.
See post #368
Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.
Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
You could take all the time left in the universe, and I'd still be right. You displayed very sloppy thinking. And that was "obvious."
You could take all the time left in the universe, and I'd still be right. You displayed very sloppy thinking. And that was "obvious."
Who's lying?
Wilson is a major recipient of contributions from the health care industry.
In fact, over his entire congressional career, health professionals represent Wilson’s top industry contributors, donating a total of $244,196 to his campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics OpenSecrets.org database. He received another $86,150 from pharmaceutical companies, $73,050 from insurance companies and $68,000 from hospitals and nursing homes.
Among Wilson’s top contributors are the American Hospital Association, a lobby group that represents the interests of hospitals and health networks, and the American Medical Association, which represents physicians. Raw Story Obama speech disrupter a health industry darling
It's really funny watching the MO's of some people around here. He comes to this site, supposedly to debate politics but as soon as he is given a debate, it's "not worth his time" anymore.
Once, yeah. Twice, even, I could see it being legitimate. But that's his stock answer whenever he is met with something he doesn't like. He's not here to debate. He's here to troll.
I But that's his stock answer whenever he is met with something he doesn't like.
Why don't you tell us all again how it was about "States Rights"
Tell us all how it was about unfair "economic aggression."
Dig yourself further into a hole.
C'mon, stand up for Dixie, Jefferson Davis is watching.
I'm not going to waste my time with people who ask me biased and heavily loaded questions.
And I'm not going to waste my time with posters who think slavery as an institution was ok.
I'm not going to waste my time with people who ask me biased and heavily loaded questions.
And I'm not going to waste my time with posters who think slavery as an institution was ok.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?