• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Jimmy Carter Interceded on Behalf of Nazi SS Guard

Cold Dirt

Banned
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
370
Reaction score
18
Location
GA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Exclusive: Jimmy Carter Interceded on Behalf of Nazi SS Guard
18:45 Jan 17, '07 / 27 Tevet 5767
by Ezra HaLevi


A former U.S. Justice Department official disclosed to Arutz-7 that former U.S. President Jimmy Carter’s advocacy extended beyond the Palestinians, when he interceded on behalf of a Nazi SS man.



Neil Sher, a veteran of the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigation, described a letter he received from Carter in 1987 in an interview with Israel National Radio’s Tovia Singer. The letter, written and signed by Carter, asked that Sher show “special consideration” for a man proven to have murdered Jews in the Mauthausen death camp in Austria.

“In 1987, Carter had been out of office for seven years or so,” Sher recalled. “It was a very active period for my office. We had just barred Kurt Waldheim – he was then president of Austria and former head of the United Nations – from entering the U.S. because of his Nazi past and his involvement in the persecution of civilians during the war. We had just deported an Estonian Nazi Commandant back to the Soviet Union after a bruising battle after which we were attacked by Reagan White House Communications Director Patrick Buchanan.

“Also around that time, in the spring of 1987, we deported a series of SS guards from concentration camps, whose names nobody would know. One such character we sent back to Austria was a man named Martin Bartesch.”

Bartesch, who had immigrated to the U.S. and lived in Chicago, admitted to Sher’s office and the court that he had voluntarily joined the Waffen SS and had served in the notorious SS Death’s Head Division at the Mauthausen concentration camp where, at the hands of Bartesch and his cohorts, many thousands of prisoners were gassed, shot, starved and worked to death. He also confessed to having concealed his service at the infamous camp from U.S. immigration officials.

“We had an extraordinary piece of evidence against him – a book that was kept by the SS and captured by the American armed forces when they liberated Mauthausen,” Sher said. “We called it the death book. It was a roster that the Germans required them to keep that identified SS guards as they extended weapons to murder the inmates and prisoners.”

An entry in the book for October 10, 1943 registered the shooting death of Max Oschorn, a French Jewish prisoner. His murderer was also recorded: SS guard Martin Bartesch. “It was a most chilling document,” Sher recalled.

The same evidence was used by the U.S. military in postwar trials as the basis for execution or long prison sentences for many identified SS guards.

Arutz Sheva - Israel National News

Now liberals....tell us that your liberal hero Carter isn't a Jew hating son of a bitch......

Just goes to show you who really is the Nazis and who supports fascism.....
 
If true... a piercing revelation. After reading the book myself, it is obvious to me that Mr. Carter is much more than meets the eye.
 
hmmmm.

The timing of this seems a bit odd to me......

didn't Carter just come out with some critical words for Israel?
 
Carter was the worse president this country ever had.........That said I truly believe that dementia has set in on him and that he should just shut the **** up.......
 
hmmmm.

The timing of this seems a bit odd to me......

didn't Carter just come out with some critical words for Israel?
A few months ago, Carter came out with a new book that was indeed critical of Israel. What was actually stunning in this, was his degree of bias.

According to the story, this former government employee kept Carter's attempted intercession into the deportation of a Nazi death camp guard a secret until he read Carter's new book. Although one must draw one's own conclusion, the inference here is that Carter has been quietly anti-Jewish for many decades.
 
Carter was the worse president this country ever had.........That said I truly believe that dementia has set in on him and that he should just shut the **** up.......

his problem has always been that he is too nice of a guy, at least that is my opinion of him and a well connected lobbiest group digging out some dirt from 20 years ago isn't going to change my mind.

This is a case in point. Apparently he received some correspondence from the niece of this SS guard claiming it was a huge mistake. My understanding is the issue was dropped once Carter found out that it wasn't a case of mistaken identity.
 
A few months ago, Carter came out with a new book that was indeed critical of Israel. What was actually stunning in this, was his degree of bias.

According to the story, this former government employee kept Carter's attempted intercession into the deportation of a Nazi death camp guard a secret until he read Carter's new book. Although one must draw one's own conclusion, the inference here is that Carter has been quietly anti-Jewish for many decades.

No offense Tashah, but I'm anti-zionist and see that as significantly different than being anti-Jewish.
 
The accusation against Carter that his motivation for interceding 'on behalf of Nazi SS Guard' was anti-semitism is flimsy. If you read the actual article by Sher with a view toward looking at facts, you see that Sher's original assessment of Carter's motivation is still the best explanation of the motives.

I chalked it up at the time to a certain naivete on the part of the former president.

The only reason Sher gives for a reassessment of Carter's motives is his 'most recent writings and comments'. I don't agree that this is enough, though I have not read the book.

Off on a tangent>>>> I am pro-Israel. I want Israel to survive because I believe Jewish people need a homeland to retreat to should things turn against them again in the wider world. However, the irony is that if things do go anti-semitic on a large scale, I just don't see how Israel could survive. This is a frightening prospect. Without the support of the wider world, Israel could end up being a death trap for them. But if the consensus of the Jewish people is that they want to try to maintain a homeland in 'Israel' or 'Palestine', then I will support it. The attractiveness of Israel as a homeland is entirely understandable due to Jewish people's emotional attachment to the location. This probably can't be overcome. I just think they'd be safer if the U.S. ceded away some decent land to their cause here. <<<< End of tangent

I have spent alot of time looking at the Arab/Israeli conflict. I do think that reasonable people can disagree with Israeli policies, and still not be anti-semitic. If Carter's theme is that Israel has truly set up an apartheid government, I disagree with him in that I believe the situations are different. However, I don't think even this position would warrant branding him an anti-semite, even in view of his intercession 'on behalf of Nazi SS guard'.
 
Last edited:
This is a case in point. Apparently he received some correspondence from the niece of this SS guard claiming it was a huge mistake. My understanding is the issue was dropped once Carter found out that it wasn't a case of mistaken identity.


I am not meaning to imply that this is not what happened. I would like to be able to verify the situation, however. Do you happen to have a link or other reference pertaining to this?
 
I am not meaning to imply that this is not what happened. I would like to be able to verify the situation, however. Do you happen to have a link or other reference pertaining to this?

Although I can't find the original article, I did find this link.


Econ-Atrocity / Econ-Utopia: On Carter on Israel, Palestine, and Apartheid

Bartesch's family and 'supporters,' seeking special relief, launched a campaign to discredit OSI while trying to garner political support. Indeed, OSI received numerous inquiries from members of Congress who had been approached. After we explained the facts of the case, however, the matter inevitably was dropped; no one urged that Bartesch or his family be accorded any special treatment.


This part really hits home with me and is why I question the timing:

Either way, it seems that Sher is trying to make a racially-tinged tempest in a teapot in order to create a connection between an apparently offhanded action of Carters twenty years ago and Carter's efforts today to sway public opinion regarding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. And what about all those other Congress people whom Sher seems to treat as fine and decent citizens despite their initial efforts on Bartesch's case? Is Sher simply waiting for any of them to write something critical of Israel, at which time he will accuse them of having been a stooge for the former Nazi?
 
Econ-Atrocity / Econ-Utopia: On Carter on Israel, Palestine, and Apartheid

Either way, it seems that Sher is trying to make a racially-tinged tempest in a teapot in order to create a connection between an apparently offhanded action of Carters twenty years ago and Carter's efforts today to sway public opinion regarding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. And what about all those other Congress people whom Sher seems to treat as fine and decent citizens despite their initial efforts on Bartesch's case? Is Sher simply waiting for any of them to write something critical of Israel, at which time he will accuse them of having been a stooge for the former Nazi?
It may be interesting to see the entire list.

I think that Mr. Abraham Foxman may have a point about the dilution of the terms antisemite and antisemitism. It seems they are slung around rather carelessly.

I've even Jews have that label hung on them for voicing opposition to some Israeli policy or another.

These sorts of grossly inappropriate use are what water down words and rob them of their power and meaning. Perhaps soon antisemite will suffer the same fate as nazi - so worn-down, over-used and mis-used that it hardly holds any meaning - eg soup-nazi, grammar-nazi, etc
 
Back
Top Bottom