• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jerry Nadler Runs Defense for Google Without Disclosing Company Was His Top Campaign Donor

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Jerry Nadler Runs Defense for Google Without Disclosing Company Was His Top Campaign Donor


https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018...isclosing-company-was-his-top-campaign-donor/
House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-NY) delivered a sharp rebuke of Republican accusations of Google’s political bias affecting its search engines on Tuesday; although, according to the Open Secrets donor database, Nadler’s top donor was Google.... Rep. Nadler delivered a scathing rebuke of Republicans who have alleged Google has biased its search engine against conservative and alternative voices during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Monday with Google CEO Sundar Pichai…. “I must first dispense with a completely illegitimate issue, which is the fantasy, dreamed up by some conservatives, that Google and other online platforms have an anti-conservative bias,” Nadler said in his opening remarks on Monday.



~~~~~~
Hmm....., a Democrat that's less than honest about something? Wow, who saw that coming?
Google is a private company and they can be as biased as they want. But given their near monopolistic market position, the government should require full disclosure of the search bias. This guy is obviously not telling the full truth.
See Marsh v. Alabama-1946. If Google and the rest of the biased Social Media are not the modern version of Company Town, then I don't know what is? If the courts can find Birth Right Citizenship in the 14th Amendment, they should be able to find First Amendment protections on Social Media too. Therefore, Google may be analogized to a company town, similar trappings of "Robber Baron" monopoly power. With Netscape, Explorer, CompuServe (?) out of the way, can Yahoo's exit be far off? Treat Google as government enterprise, subject to Freedom of Information acts? Or, treat like public utility, subject to "public service commission"- type oversight? Why not?
ITMT, perhaps Jerry needs to be investigated for campaign donation violations. Just like he wants to do to trump.
 

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,555
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Jerry Nadler Runs Defense for Google Without Disclosing Company Was His Top Campaign Donor


https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018...isclosing-company-was-his-top-campaign-donor/
House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-NY) delivered a sharp rebuke of Republican accusations of Google’s political bias affecting its search engines on Tuesday; although, according to the Open Secrets donor database, Nadler’s top donor was Google.... Rep. Nadler delivered a scathing rebuke of Republicans who have alleged Google has biased its search engine against conservative and alternative voices during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Monday with Google CEO Sundar Pichai…. “I must first dispense with a completely illegitimate issue, which is the fantasy, dreamed up by some conservatives, that Google and other online platforms have an anti-conservative bias,” Nadler said in his opening remarks on Monday.



~~~~~~
Hmm....., a Democrat that's less than honest about something? Wow, who saw that coming?
Google is a private company and they can be as biased as they want. But given their near monopolistic market position, the government should require full disclosure of the search bias. This guy is obviously not telling the full truth.
See Marsh v. Alabama-1946. If Google and the rest of the biased Social Media are not the modern version of Company Town, then I don't know what is? If the courts can find Birth Right Citizenship in the 14th Amendment, they should be able to find First Amendment protections on Social Media too. Therefore, Google may be analogized to a company town, similar trappings of "Robber Baron" monopoly power. With Netscape, Explorer, CompuServe (?) out of the way, can Yahoo's exit be far off? Treat Google as government enterprise, subject to Freedom of Information acts? Or, treat like public utility, subject to "public service commission"- type oversight? Why not?
ITMT, perhaps Jerry needs to be investigated for campaign donation violations. Just like he wants to do to trump.

What a bunch of pointless wordsalads. Really, Breitbart focusing on the most pressing issues of the day...YES!!!! YES!!!! We got him!!!!!!! GOOGLE donates to campaigns!!!!!! SCANDAL!!!!! LOOK!!!!!!!LOOK!!!!!!!
 

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
What a bunch of pointless wordsalads. Really, Breitbart focusing on the most pressing issues of the day...YES!!!! YES!!!! We got him!!!!!!! GOOGLE donates to campaigns!!!!!! SCANDAL!!!!! LOOK!!!!!!!LOOK!!!!!!!

~~~~~~
When Nadler served in the New York state legislature in the late 1970s, he was an open and well known member of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, which merged with former communists and student radicals from the New American Movement to form D.S.A. in 1982. Now as a Congressman in D.C., Nadler implemented his ideology as frequently as possible. His bias and connection to Google should bar him from any investigations and judgements in this matter.


Jerry Nadler
https://www.keywiki.org/Jerry_Nadler
Jerry Nadler was identified as a member of Democratic Socialists of America in DSA's Democratic Left, January 1983 issue, page 14. In New York, DSA State assembly members now include Eileen Dugan , Denny Farrell , and Jerry Nadler.
 

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,555
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
~~~~~~
When Nadler served in the New York state legislature in the late 1970s, he was an open and well known member of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, which merged with former communists and student radicals from the New American Movement to form D.S.A. in 1982. Now as a Congressman in D.C., Nadler implemented his ideology as frequently as possible. His bias and connection to Google should bar him from any investigations and judgements in this matter.


Jerry Nadler
https://www.keywiki.org/Jerry_Nadler
Jerry Nadler was identified as a member of Democratic Socialists of America in DSA's Democratic Left, January 1983 issue, page 14. In New York, DSA State assembly members now include Eileen Dugan , Denny Farrell , and Jerry Nadler.

So what?
 

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed



~~~~~~~

https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=kXn9DplMaGo


During a December 3, 2009 House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Jerry Nadler again defended the corrupt organization ACORN and refused to investigate its activities.
ACORN definitely had corrupt branches. It's literally being blamed for everything. That's not hyperbole.
Conversely, according to the honorable J. Nadler, Congress has no "right" or "function" with which to investigate Union Corruption, Organized Crime or Individuals accused of Communist affiliations (private individuals) via the House Un-American Activities Committee. Nadler is full of crap and he knows it. IMHO, politicians are parasites.They invent nothing, sell nothing make nothing but laws designed to separate you from your money so they can spread it around to their ideologically Marxist Socialist fellow travelers. Obviously in nearly ten years his Un-American activities and Marxist Socialist ideological attitude has not changed.
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
263,471
Reaction score
81,514
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
What a bunch of pointless wordsalads. Really, Breitbart focusing on the most pressing issues of the day...YES!!!! YES!!!! We got him!!!!!!! GOOGLE donates to campaigns!!!!!! SCANDAL!!!!! LOOK!!!!!!!LOOK!!!!!!!

its interesting watching a supposed GOP member defending a complete democrat hack like Nadler.
 

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,555
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
its interesting watching a supposed GOP member defending a complete democrat hack like Nadler.

Unless there's international campaign finance violations going on, I generally do not care which companies donate to whom.
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
263,471
Reaction score
81,514
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Unless there's international campaign finance violations going on, I generally do not care which companies donate to whom.

if you don't care you wouldn't be defending one of the more odious scumbags in the Democrat party. It would be like someone claiming to be a Democrat who was defending Say Jesse Helms or B-1 Bob Dornan
 

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,555
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
if you don't care you wouldn't be defending one of the more odious scumbags in the Democrat party. It would be like someone claiming to be a Democrat who was defending Say Jesse Helms or B-1 Bob Dornan

Saying who cares is not exactly defending him. However, in this case he is right. There is no evidence that google is bias against conservatives. They should just all do less scuzzy things.
 

JoanDavis

Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
594
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
its interesting watching a supposed GOP member defending a complete democrat hack like Nadler.

It's more interesting watching republicans who respected Reagan, Bush and McCain continue to defend the russian agent and ***** grabbing douchebag trump.
 

iguanaman

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
53,533
Reaction score
19,479
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
its interesting watching a supposed GOP member defending a complete democrat hack like Nadler.

Not every Republican is in a hate and greed induced trance like you. The only "bias" Google shows is for the truth.
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
263,471
Reaction score
81,514
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Not every Republican is in a hate and greed induced trance like you. The only "bias" Google shows is for the truth.

as usual you miss the point
 
Top Bottom