- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Just days after the massacre in an Orlando nightclub left 49 people dead and 53 wounded, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on Tuesday said that gun control is now a critical element of protecting the U.S. homeland and keeping Americans safe."We have to face the fact that meaningful gun control has to be a part of homeland security," Johnson said in an interview on "CBS This Morning." "We need to do something to minimize the opportunity for terrorists to get a gun in this country."
On the issue of people on the no-fly list and various other lists being able to purchase a weapon in the U.S., Johnson said, "I believe that that's something that has to be addressed."
Jeh Johnson: Gun control is now a matter of homeland security - CBS News
Constitutional Rights are merely obstacles to the controlled, planned progressive future, looks like they have their excuse to remove one.
For some reason, in that interview, he seems disappointed that after Sandy Hook, action wasn't taken on banning weapons.
Almost like "Dang! I thought if we killed kids it would make changes occur"
Never let a tragedy go to waste...
Jeh Johnson: Gun control is now a matter of homeland security - CBS News
Constitutional Rights are merely obstacles to the controlled, planned progressive future, looks like they have their excuse to remove one.
If you take out the word "gun" and replace it with "Muslim", you can't tell the difference between Trump and these clowns.
What if (and, this is just a thought), every single problem we faced wasn't solved by abusing our Constitutional rights?
From your linked article:
"We need to do something to minimize the opportunity for terrorists to get a gun in this country." On the issue of people on the no-fly list and various other lists being able to purchase a weapon in the U.S., Johnson said, "I believe that that's something that has to be addressed."
The Constitution was authored and ratified by white, rich, inbred, slave-owning racists, dontcha know? :roll: Consequently, loathing and ignoring the Constitution is a progressive thing to do.
Jeh Johnson: Gun control is now a matter of homeland security - CBS News
Constitutional Rights are merely obstacles to the controlled, planned progressive future, looks like they have their excuse to remove one.
The Constitution was authored and ratified by white, rich, inbred, slave-owning racists, dontcha know? :roll: Consequently, loathing and ignoring the Constitution is a progressive thing to do.
Except that the issue of what constitutes CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is something we wildly disagree about when it comes to guns. So the cheap shot you just took - that people who want gun control want "to remove one" - is simply not part of any serious discussion as it perverts and distorts what is really being considered.
We agree that you're wrong.
INBRED????? Please document that claim.
WE? Who is WE?
Except that the issue of what constitutes CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is something we wildly disagree about when it comes to guns.
Did you find something you disagree with? :lol:
Then that's really something that needs to be addressed by the SCOTUS or the constitutional amendment process.
It isn't the place of executive appointees to dictate how rights are to be interpreted and then decide which rights are to be extended to whom.
We've had these discussions before, and you've had this laid out for you. We can't keep indulging your forgetfulness.
WE? Who is WE?
Except that the issue of what constitutes CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is something we wildly disagree about when it comes to guns. So the cheap shot you just took - that people who want gun control want "to remove one" - is simply not part of any serious discussion as it perverts and distorts what is really being considered.
Oh spare us the bull**** mmkay? Your view of what a right is, and what a Right is by the Constitution are completely opposite. The Constitution was written as a protection of Natural Rights, that idea is alien to you and those like Mr. Johnston, so having a discussion about rights with you is quite a challenge.
Jeh Johnson: Gun control is now a matter of homeland security - CBS News
Constitutional Rights are merely obstacles to the controlled, planned progressive future, looks like they have their excuse to remove one.
The Constitution provides no such power to the Supreme Court either.
U.S. Constitution Art. III § II said:The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution...
What our rights mean and their exercise is a subject for all of us as Americans.
Thus my point is proven. Thank you and have a nice day/There are no such things as natural rights to protect.
No, you claim "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS" while at the same time utterly denying the very foundation of said rights, thus negating you as an honest debater of the matter.If you believe there are - simply provide verifiable evidence of that claim.
There is no reason for you to insult me by characterizing my post as BS merely because we have a legitimate difference of opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?