- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,485
- Reaction score
- 28,830
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So you’re telling us that the IPCC is ignoring papers by James Hansen, one of the most prominent members of the climate research community going back decades? The guy who was a contributing author to the IPCC?You know, when I present papers, you guys cannot read them and claim I'm lying. What's the point when you only rely on someone else telling you what is and isn't true?
Here is one I linked before:
Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications | Science
science.sciencemag.orgThe lag in the climate response to a forcing is a sensitive function of equilibrium climate sensitivity, varying approximately as the square of the sensitivity, and it depends on the rate of heat exchange between the ocean's surface mixed layer and the deeper ocean. The lag could be as short as a decade, if climate sensitivity is as small as 0.25°C per W/m2 of forcing, but it is a century or longer if climate sensitivity is 1°C per W/m2 or larger. Evidence from Earth's history and climate models suggests that climate sensitivity is 0.75° ± 0.25°C per W/m2, implying that 25 to 50 years are needed for Earth's surface temperature to reach 60% of its equilibrium response.
There are other papers indicating a lag of several decades.
I get really tired of your denial of science, and making false accusations of me.
LOL.
This ones so stupid I might consider wasting time to actually find it referenced in AR5,but you’d whine about how the authors don’t understand the paper as well as you do, so I won’t bother.
You’re hilarious. Really