- Joined
- Oct 15, 2020
- Messages
- 50,787
- Reaction score
- 26,375
- Location
- Greater Boston Area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
For the US being in the lead, In part, yes. Sorry if that troubles you.Oh my gawd. Another Biden fault's OP. Sickening!
View attachment 67385369
Is this Biden's fault also?
Inflation rates are rising around the world
View attachment 67385366
Understanding why the rate of inflation has risen so quickly could help clarify how long the surge might last – and what, if anything, policymakers should do about it. The recent acceleration in the rate of inflation appears to be fundamentally different from other inflationary periods that were more closely tied to the regular business cycle. Explanations for the current phenomenon proffered to date include continuing disruptions in global supply chains amid the coronavirus pandemic; turmoil in the labor markets; the fact that today’s prices are being measured against prices during last year’s COVID-19-induced shutdowns; and strong consumer demand after local economies were reopened.
Junk mail?What did people receive in the mail two or three times in 2020?
What happened in January/February 2021?
It's just a fact.That borders on willful ignorance, IMO.
What you fail to appreciate is that the fed and federal government injected stimulus into an already recovering economy.
That is proving to have been a disaster, and there’s no getting around that.
Junk mail?
No, I'm saying the inflation rate globally is not uniform. Ours is worse, and it's worse for reason, no matter how politically inconvenient some may find that reason.It's just a fact.
Are you saying it's not global.
I simply don't agree with that. The signs of recovery were there. The Biden administration and the Democrats on The Hill decided those signs were no reason to let a good crisis go to waste, and they presented the spending as needed relief. They were wrong (or more likely, lied).Trying to be as objective as possible...
I'll concede that the stimulus in early 2021 was probably not necessary in retrospect. That wasn't an easy call to make at the time because nobody knew whether the pandemic was coming or going. As it turned out, we had more waves but we more or less learned to live with the virus once we had the vaccines. Even so, there were still major disruptions in critical areas both abroad and at home, with seaports and shipping infrastructure impacted by worker stoppages due to COVID.
Yes, all those savings ... and we still sent most of those savers relief checks. You're only proving my point.Biden's stimulus is just one of many factors contributing to inflation. As others have posted, inflation is hardly a US problem. The combination of stimulus, extended lockdowns, and working from home resulted in a $2 trillion savings among US households (according to one estimate I've read/heard). If there's a lesson to be learned from this it's that we need to be better prepared to deliver economic stimulus that's better targeted to suit the needs of the entire population. Much of the stimulus went to middle and upper middle class households with jobs that paid fairly well and also allowed the flexibility to work from home. Conversely the lower-wage earners - Uber & Instacart drivers and supermarket employees - had income support but they've been impacted by the inflation much more so than the middle and upper income earners who were eligible for the stimulus. Future stimulus programs ought to keep this in mind. Worth noting that most of the stimulus came in 2020, before Biden took office.
This is not a partisan thing. It's a policy thing.Stimulus checks. In 2020. Before Biden took office.
It's only slightly worse and that is because our economy bounced back quicker. More demand, limited supply, equals higher prices.No, I'm saying the inflation rate globally is not uniform. Ours is worse, and it's worse for reason, no matter how politically inconvenient some may find that reason.
Do you know of any other countries that helped their people through the pandemic with stimulus checks?For the US being in the lead, In part, yes. Sorry if that troubles you.
But the annual inflation rates for dozens and dozens of goods routinely purchased by American households - including food - were already at their highest levels in a decade before Biden entered the White House early this year.
That's in large part because of the COVID-19 relief spending enacted under Republican Donald Trump's administration with overwhelming Republican support in the Senate. It exceeds what Democrats have allocated so far by roughly $1 trillion.
Sure you can point, but can you prove?I can point fingers at the policies that made it worse, some of which have been supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
I simply don't agree with that. The signs of recovery were there. The Biden administration and the Democrats on The Hill decided those signs were no reason to let a good crisis go to waste, and they presented the spending as needed relief. They were wrong (or more likely, lied).
Yes, all those savings ... and we still sent most of those savers relief checks. You're only proving my point.
This is not a partisan thing. It's a policy thing.
No, you seem spun.It's only slightly worse and that is because our economy bounced back quicker. More demand, limited supply, equals higher prices.
That is basic economics.
You seem confused.
Not to the close minded, no.Sure you can point, but can you prove?
I don't speak for them; I speak for me.Democrats could have made it a partisan thing but didn't. Republicans could have made more stimulus a policy thing but didn't, just like Republicans could make balanced budgets a policy thing but usually make it a partisan thing.
You don't understand how supply and demand effect price.No, you seem spun.
And you don't seem to understand where the supply came from.You don't understand how supply and demand effect price.
Take a class.
Where supply came from?And you don't seem to understand where the supply came from.
Close minded, or just skeptical of right-wing talking points unsupported by data?Not to the close minded, no.
Fair enoughI don't speak for them; I speak for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?