- Joined
- Nov 27, 2016
- Messages
- 30,562
- Reaction score
- 6,449
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Their ”opposing ideas” included overturning a free and fair election, and potentially aiding in the insurrection at the Capitol. The former disqualifies them from ever having a credible voice in our democracy whether their voters agree or not, the latter if proven demands expulsion.
We are a nation of laws, not a nation of “I like laws except when I have an opposing idea to them”.
So the lady who names herself after an organization that is all about "lawbreaking" and 'resistance' now suddenly comdemns lawbreaking and resistance?
Or is rioting and lawbreaking as a means of pressuring the powerful for change only acceptable if the rioting is done by the proper people in pursuit of the proper objectives?
Last edited: