My standard food for thought question:
WHY did the worlds greatest military power FAIL to defend even its own HQ?
& on 9/12 Donald Rumsfeld still had a JOB (?) whats up with that ?!?!?!?!?!?!
or?
The part of the Pentagon that was struck happened to contain the auditors working for congress trying to find some missing funds that congress was investigating. Cynthia McKinney, then congresscritter, was head of a committee that was investigating the missing funds. Just the day before she had deposed Rumsfeld and an assistant regarding those funds.
Destruction of evidence was the main goal, and of course theatrics.
I agree Mike, and have always said that--the funds missing and the congressional investigation began BEFORE Bush took office. Congress is always slow to act, and so it was with the investigation of the missing funds.
But that does not mean that insiders like Dov Zakheim were not aware of it. They were aware of it, and the smirk on Rummy's face in front of the news cameras on 10 September tells it all. He knew that less than 24 hours later the subject would become academic.
[bold], that is what needs to be proven.
Some of us are more perceptive than others when it comes to reading body language.
The part of the Pentagon that was struck happened to contain the auditors working for congress trying to find some missing funds that congress was investigating.
Prove it.
Why don't YOU take a shot at proving that United 77 hit the building?
Again, I'll be OK because I won't be holding my breath. :lamo
I asked you first bub. Can you support your stupid claims or not?
Well Bub, I can't see a Boeing anywhere in those pictures. Plus, analysis in the last few years by Dennis Cimino of the FDR provided by the government shows the FDR in question to be a hoax. Plus, the cellphone calls by Mrs. Olsen and others from that airplane were impossible.
So Bub, no pictures, no FDR, and impossible phone calls.
So Bub, YOU claim there was a Boeing there. I can't see anything resembling a Boeing at that site. If YOU assert there was a Boeing, it is incumbent upon YOU to support your claim.
Who knows, maybe you're right? I can't see it. Please show it to me.
This is an adult discussion we're having, isn't it? You claim a 757 was there, I don't. Prove your claim.
WTF are you talking about? This was your statement that I asked you to prove:
"The part of the Pentagon that was struck happened to contain the auditors working for congress trying to find some missing funds that congress was investigating."
If we are having "an adult conversation", how about you actually ****ing READ instead of just spewing off about there being no plane.
So, can you prove your stupid claim that there were auditors from Congress in that part of the building or not?
That is old news indeed 505. Years old. The Office of Naval Investigations was hit, and adjacent areas which held the congressional auditors. Rumsfeld was deposed by Cynthia McKinney about this audit the day before--September 10. That was on CSPAN, and I have seen it.
I have no obligation to educate you or any other poster. If you are grossly ignorant of historical events, that is a personal problem.
Come back when you can engage in rational dialogue. In the meantime, I hope you will inform yourself about what really happened, and what did not really happen.
"Oh I heard it on CSPAN one time."
No wonder you chumps can't get a clue. You refuse to actually question your sources and find out if **** is really true or not.
"Oh I heard it on CSPAN one time."
No wonder you chumps can't get a clue. You refuse to actually question your sources and find out if **** is really true or not.
Please keep the building talk, no-planes, nukes, energy weapons, fake victims and hoax talk out of this thread. It is disinformation and misinformation, and will not be appreciated. So do everybody everywhere a favor and NOT post that refuse here. Thank you.
What this thread is intended for is a discussion and link depositary for open credible sources regarding all things pertaining to, or are relevant to 9/11 before or after the day that irrevocably changed America and the world.
Now, for the first link: BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush says he had no 9/11 warning
From the article, President George W. Bush is quoted as saying, "I am satisfied that I never saw any intelligence that indicated there was going to be an attack on America - at a time and a place, an attack."
The 08/06/01 Presidential Daily Brief, titled, "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States" (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/pdb8-6-2001.pdf) certainly shows that President Bush had indeed been briefed about an attack occurring within the U.S. Though, the brief does not give specific time/date information, we nonetheless see that President Bush lied.
It is worth mentioning that al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden made it into the Presidential Daily Brief over forty times before 9/11 during just the Bush administration.
Lest I forget the PDB during the Clinton administration: https://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/pdb120498.pdf
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?