• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It seems rather ironic


Again that bill was paid in full by soldiers of the North, both black and white. It was paid in blood!!!!!
 

Democrats aren't famous for thinking very far beyond their emotional appeal to gain a vote.
 
Really? They must be blind then.

Many see gerrymandering as a Jim Crow issue. Some (like me) see the stark racial divide in large urban school systems as effectively separate but unequal.
 

It would appear that you believe in the "Big Switch" theory. Tell us where you disagree with Dinesh D'Souza's explanation.


The History of the Democrat Party from Slavery to Wealth Redistribution | Dinesh D'Souza
YouTube
 
It would appear that you believe in the "Big Switch" theory. Tell us where you disagree with Dinesh D'Souza's explanation.


The History of the Democrat Party from Slavery to Wealth Redistribution | Dinesh D'Souza
YouTube

Not interested.
 
Of course you're not. Dinesh puts the lie to your alternate history.

You mean history grounded in scholarship as attacked by a hair brained conspiracy theorist. You should find a different forum.
 
You mean history grounded in scholarship as attacked by a hair brained conspiracy theorist. You should find a different forum.

Ah, the labeling again. Perhaps it is YOU that should give up all forums. You have demonstrated your lack of understanding.
 
Ah, the labeling again. Perhaps it is YOU that should give up all forums. You have demonstrated your lack of understanding.

Again?

The original foolish label in this exchange is that of "alternate history" for historical scholarship while promoting a conspiracy nutcase as the genuine article.
 
Again?

The original foolish label in this exchange is that of "alternate history" for historical scholarship while promoting a conspiracy nutcase as the genuine article.

And yet you don't dispute his facts. You belittle with no documentation. Sounds about right. How did you ever make it this far?
 
And yet you don't dispute his facts. You belittle with no documentation. Sounds about right. How did you ever make it this far?

I made it "this far" by serious reading, working, making relationships. I've no interest in your YouTuber, as I said at the outset.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…