• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

It’s Time To Retreat!

F41

Active member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
341
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
It’s Time To Retreat!

The news reports we hear about more deaths are disturbing. Every night we see on TV photos of death and destruction. We are occupying their land, which we had to take by force, it causes us only trouble.

Many of our own children go there and they never return. Many of their people are uncivilized. This land is subject to only destruction

There are many religious sects, that we do not understand. Their way of life and beliefs are difficult or impossible to comprehend for the ordinary American. After all this time, we can’t even secure their borders.

They are billions of dollars in debt and it will cost us billions more to rebuild, which our economy can’t afford. Why do we continue to turn a blind eye to the obvious? It is becoming clear. We must pull out of California.

My question would be, do you think we should have the right deny the membership of a state or states to the Union, and if you could, what state would you vote out?
 
Last edited:
This is obviously a hate based thread. Remember, the South tried to secede from the Union and the traitor Lincoln refused it, thus causing a war. Why should other states get to leave?
 
Blue Collar Joe said:
This is obviously a hate based thread. Remember, the South tried to secede from the Union and the traitor Lincoln refused it, thus causing a war. Why should other states get to leave?
This is not a hate based thread. It is intended for debate. although I do agree with you on Lincoln. He in my op was a president who made some very bad decisions.
 
:rofl Losing Californicate would not be a great loss. And, on the same token, we could give the Israeli's southern Texas, along the border. Why? Well, it would solve two problems: The middle east could then blow themselves up, as the Israeli's would be over here.
The other benefit? Who is better at protecting a border than them? No more illegal aliens!!!
 
Blue Collar Joe said:
:rofl Losing Californicate would not be a great loss. And, on the same token, we could give the Israeli's southern Texas, along the border.
So your vote would be Texas.
 
No, the entire western seaboard. Cali, Oregon and Washington State could all go bye bye. Texas is still much bigger than Isreal, and would be a good safe haven. We'll just need better border security to keep them Cali's back on their side.
 
Blue Collar Joe said:
No, the entire western seaboard. Cali, Oregon and Washington State could all go bye bye.
I like it!
 
I've mentioned this before...

cnredd said:
I've always had this thought....

If someone wanted to be preseident, all they had to do is attack California...just keep saying "They're a bunch of nutcases!...Not like the rest of the country." and the other 49 states will vote for you.
 
This is such a stupid thread.
 
I'd have to go with D.C.

I think the good people of this country have had enough of their maniacal games. It's time for serious reform.
 
Conflict said:
I'd have to go with D.C.

I think the good people of this country have had enough of their maniacal games. It's time for serious reform.


Can't we make it easy and deport everyone in DC to the Socialist States of the Left Coast Coalition?
 
Back
Top Bottom