And even before she did the Palestinian and European 'activists' have been hurling rocks at the Israeli border police as they have been doing on a daily basis for decades now.
They were throwing rocks from their truck?
Are we moving the situations around now?
Hah, the Electronic Intifada, are you going to cite Hamas' website too at some point because that will be hilarious. You must.
Way to pick out on source amongst the various others that back it up.. But yea whatever.
And no, there is no German military aid to Israel, Germany has been selling stuff to Israel just as it does to many other countries, it does not however send military aid as you have claimed above.
Lets see here what do you call something that is "fully funded" by another country? Isnt that aid???
"Both submarines contracted under the 2005 deal are still under construction in Germany, with first deliveries planned for 2012. They will join Israel's three-Dolphin fleet, operational since 2001; two of the Dolphins were fully funded by Germany, and costs for the third were shared evenly by the two countries."http://www.defensenews.com/article/20100118/DEFFEAT04/1180309/Israel-Seeks-German-Arms-Aid-Deal
Face it you lied, and we both know that wasn't a firsty there eh?
Nope no i didnt see above.
White Phosphorous is, as I have already stated in an earlier thread and must repeat now, not a chemical weapon and is not recognized as an unconventional weapon by the international community. It is being used routinely by all advanced armies in the world, including that of the US. Next.
" Article 1 of Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons defines an incendiary weapon as 'any weapon or munition which is primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat, or combination thereof, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target'. The same protocol prohibits the use of said incendiary weapons against civilians (already forbidden by the Geneva Conventions) or in civilian areas. The convention also defines weapons which are not to be considered to be incendiary weapons. Examples are: (i) Munitions which may have incidental incendiary effects, such as illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling systems; (ii) Munitions designed to combine penetration, blast or fragmentation effects with an additional incendiary effect."
White phosphorus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
when used on civilians is violation of the geneva convention.
Not to derail this thread from its topic, but Israel has ceased creating new settlements ages ago. It builds within existing settlements and constructs new buildings in East Jerusalem, an area Israel has annexed during the '67 war and not occupied.
Settlements beign built in general on a occupied population infact by law is a violation of international law
And also dont mind that the legalized three in April of 2012 which were even illegal by Israeli standards?
Israel Legalizes 'Outpost' Settlements - The Daily Beast
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/w...s-3-west-bank-settlements.html?pagewanted=all
And also continue to expand many..
Also, no collective punishment
What to you call buldozing homes, bombing civilian populations, checkpoints, a separation wall, a blockade, denying aid, and diverting wells and water supply?
and there is no violation of international laws regarding the Palestinians so called right of return.
Lets see here under the UDHR all persons have the right to return to their nation of origin. The Palestinians were forced to leave in the 1948 War and the 1967 War and flee to neighboring countries and refugee camps and now they are being denied the right to reenter back to their land and property.
And yet here I am, again, utterly shocked.
I could care less.