• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Israel and Iran Share Most Negative Ratings in Global Poll

You assume that policy makers view foreign policy as a popularity contest. Maybe they don't care what the rest of the world thinks.

I don't understand; "democracy" is good on a local, municipal level, on a state level, and on a national level... but not on a global level?
Foreign policy effects the whole world, so why not let the world have a vote on it? Or at least take their feelings into consideration.
 
You will NOT see me defend support for regimes like Saudi Arabia, so at least you can't accuse me of hypocrisy on that point.

And why shouldn't we defend Saudi Arabia? What is the alternative? Do you really believe that if we topple the regime (or allow the people to topple it), that it will be replaced by a happy, prosperous pro-American democracy? Of course not. If the House of Saud falls, it will be replaced by something resembling the Taliban and there will be a free-for-all for its oil supplies.

The perfect is the enemy of the good. Just because we may wish that Saudi Arabia's government looked more like Massachusetts doesn't mean that it's going to happen. Protecting the monarchy is a wise foreign policy decision.
 
Its obvious for me that you two have been systematically brainwashed by your government, alongside millions of others. To you the whole world is about terrorism or America, America or Iraq, North Korea, Iran, Russia and the Middle East. Besides that you are completely empty, there just isnt any other issues to you guys. What about F$$$*** Africa for example? Have your heard of Africa? Do you know whats going on there, except in Somalia? Have your heard of Southeast Asia? What about South America? I guess the whole world in your blind eyes are overrun by Islamist killers and terrorists. FU$$*** newsflash, its not. Terrorists attacked WTC in New York in 2001, London and Madrid. Besides that, terrorism is irrelevant compared to other issues facing the world.

Its seems very clear to me that American knowledge of anything other than America is limited to the places the US are at war with or have been at war with.. This is why every American still thinks Europe is a place of Hitler and Churchill, or that the whole Middle east are terrorists because of 20 guys, that Africa is Somalia, or that Asia is Vietnam or China.

Well, I got news for you guys.. WAKE THE FU** UP!!!

CAUSES OF DEATH
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0779147.html
List of causes of death by rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Terrorism isnt on any of those lists...

Everything in bold is what I am talking about. Stereotypes and overgeneralizations of Americans that only further arguments and defensiveness. Absolutist statements like 'every American' only foster American dislike of those from European countries. If this is your intent, then keep doing it.
 
We've actually been discussing why European countries and the United States have such huge ideological differences. One of the main reasons Europeans are so inclined towards high taxes is because they see wealth as always inherited, due to centuries under aristocracies. The US didn't have visible aristocracies leading to more reliance on individualism. Just a little perspective on European-American differences.

Sorry to say, but what a load of BS.
 
Thank you, very nice posting, very to the point.

I will explain why this is so.. This forum is largely dominated by people who are indoctrinated with Bush government policies. It almost seem to me that they have been brainwashed in some way, and that the only thing on their mind is glorifying America and talking about how bad terrorism is, and how terrorism IS THE ONLY PROBLEM the world faces.
Maybe the Americans are trying to brainwash others into their way of thinking, I dont think that will work.
So yes, the Americans use labels, thats a very good and easy way to debate.

Here we go again. Do you pay attention to American posters, here? There is a large contingent that do not agree with the Bush governmental policies, and yet you have succeeded in annoying them, too, due to your blatent, overgeneralized, stereotypical statements, that constantly bash America. For example, I do not believe that terrorism is the ONLY PROBLEM THE WORLD FACES. In my opinion, education and global health are more important. Yet when you spout your stereotypical anti-American comments, you only create defensiveness and negate your argument by only stating the negatives and refusing to focus on solutions. Blame solves nothing.

PeteEU, lets just call anyone who says anything about Europe that is not interesting or positive, "war mongering American".. Doesnt matter if hes Asian or American, we can call him that as an answer anyways. What says you?

This statement is totally absurd, and does nothing but shows your closed-minded anti-American views. So, if something is not posted interesting or positive about Europe, it must be simply rhetoric from a 'war-mongering American'? In other words, unless someone agrees with your viewpoint and only posts interesting or positive things about Europe, you refuse to debate, and will, instead, resort to name-calling? Doesn't sound like a, potentially, successful debating style.
 
This statement is totally absurd, and does nothing but shows your closed-minded anti-American views. So, if something is not posted interesting or positive about Europe, it must be simply rhetoric from a 'war-mongering American'? In other words, unless someone agrees with your viewpoint and only posts interesting or positive things about Europe, you refuse to debate, and will, instead, resort to name-calling? Doesn't sound like a, potentially, successful debating style.

Hmm where did I write this? I dont recall or can find where I wrote this. I know I am getting older, but still.
 
Its complicated. Iraq is certainly a part of it, but I think the state of the US and how other perceive the US as functioning is the most important issue.
I think most Europeans will start disliking the US when they see that a US government manipulates its people into thinking things that are untrue or just straight propaganda.
Europeans have seen this happen before in Germany, and don't want to see it happen in the US.

The US as it is now is a badly functioning nation(yes, its rich but still).. The current functioning of the US is like a bad personality disorder, almost schizophrenic. The US is so far to the right compared to the world, that the only fair thing the world can compare it to is nazi Germany. In European eyes even the democratic party is hanging on the right side.

There are real signs that the US population is slowly being brainwashed by the over powerful media, into thinking the world is only about the US and terrorism. I think the US population is in a spasm of shock after what happened on 911, and we are all just waiting for the US population to break free of that and start thinking again. What the US need is liberalization from fear.

I am sorry to sound so negative, but I think the US government took advantage of 911 and turned the US into something other nations mostly don't like. Its such a shame to think about, when the US was loved by most nations and people only 10 years ago. What did happen?

Interesting. I asked a question on the differences in how the world views Britain and France based on the article that you posted and you answer me by making negative statements around the US. 'Badly functioning', 'manipulates it's people', 'personality disorder', 'brainwashed'. This all totally irrelevant to my question. All it does is enhance the observation that you are becoming a 'one-trick' debater, your trick being, 'let's attack and blame America and Americans'.

How about addressing my original question? According to the poll, the view of Britain has slipped, yet the view of France has gone up. What do you all perceive are some of the causes of this?
 
Hmm where did I write this? I dont recall or can find where I wrote this. I know I am getting older, but still.

Wasn't you. I was quoting Maximus, who was requesting you say this. It's all cool. :cool:
 
Yeah, and Europe give private donations as well.. But this is about state donation as per cent of GDP.

Why do you start comparing two completely different things btw? You logic is completely flaw.

I say "the US foreign aid is very low, the EU donates much more"
you say "the US donates a lot in private donations" <-- as if no one else do? how is that even relevant?
I say "well, everyone else also donates privately"

The U.S. gives more in private charity annually than the entire GDP's of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden which are often cited as being more generous than the U.S. by anti-American's; such as, yourself.
 
The U.S. gives more in private charity annually than the entire GDP's of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden which are often cited as being more generous than the U.S. by anti-American's; such as, yourself.

And you have a link to prove this?
 
I am fully aware of that, and hence the main reason European issues are not debated that much, and I fully accept it.

That's OK. Perhaps I should spend more time in the European Forum, to learn more about what's happening over there.

Not that different. Political party has a candidate who gets voted in .. same principles. Only real difference is the EU, which I admit, even most Europeans dont even understand (or want to understand), and there are quite a bit of missinformation out there about the EU. Both are democratic states, and both have issues (some greater than others) with maintaining those democracies.
Truthfully, though, to many of us Americans, it is more complicated, when you talk of several political parties, coalition governments, and how liberal and leftist, and conservative and rightwing don't always match up. Volker and Maximus gave me a couple of links that were somewhat helpful.

One thing that is clear though, Americans hate "goverment" while Europeans see it as a needed evil at worst. If Americans could define what they hate about goverment, then we could at least debate that.
Some Americans say they hate government. What they mean is that they hate the current government. Government is necessary to avoid anarchy and chaos. Most Americans recognize this. Often, dislike of governmental policy is expressed in overly strong terms. If you read posts by Americans here, I think you'll find that nearly all, even if they dislike the current administration, do not advocate the abolishment of government nor are anti-American, though there are some on this board who would claim that disagreeing with the government equates to being anti-American. These are foolish extremists that represent a small, irrelevant minority.

Good to hear. One reason is probally that there is nearly no US involvement in both situations and hence most dont give a damn :)
Agreed. Certainly the 'African World War', should receive more interest.

I agree fully. However I think that americans suffer much more than Europeans on these boards. We constantly see the use of "EU", Europe and other generalizations, when the person(s) are actually discussing situations in single nations in Europe (most often France).

But that does not mean we Europeans dont generalize on the US, just not the same if you ask me. Spain and Denmark are very different politically, culturally and socially, as is the UK and Greece, Italy and Sweden and so on. While there are differences between the states in the US, its no where near as different as in Europe. For one thing, with a few exceptions, all states in the US speak one language...
I know, for myself, I seldom initiate any debate around the EU...I tend to address individual countries. Any statements I make about the EU are responses to European posters. I think that the generalizations that each 'side' makes is different. Americans often generalize what happens in one European country happens in another. Europeans seem to generalize that what the American government says is what all Americans adhere to. Neither of these statements are accurate.

As for generalisations by Europeans on America.. care to name any just for the hell of it? We might not see them as generalisations off hand.
All Americans consider terrorism to be the only world problem worth addressing.

All Americans support each and every action by Israel without question.

All Americans believe that everything in America is vastly superior to everything anywhere else.

Lots of absolutist statements, that are often rendered either because of stereotyping or because of what our media says. Always take American media with a grain of salt.

I agree, however you have to understand the distrust and hatred among the peoples of the world towards Bush and his allies in the US political system and among the American people. And this is has all to do with Iraq and the so called War on Terror. I know Europeans are horrified and shocked when they see the bastion of democracy, rule of law and fairness, the USA, break basic human rights and international law, not to mention "bend" domestic laws, just because of a "war" that is not a conventional war.

Add to that, the usual double standard of American politics, both internationally and domestic, and well you got a nice breeding ground for issues.

Its natural for americans to rush in defense of its leaders (everyone does it), but when that defense is not warrented or justified, then frankly it shows a population that is brainwashed or at best dont give a rats arse.
I understand what you are saying here; I don't agree, fully, however. It's true that Bush policies have been a major reason why there has been a negative reaction towards America. Yet what Europeans don't seem to get is that doesn't necessitate a negative reaction towards Americans. We here do not, necessarily rush to the defense of our leaders. Contrarily, there is a tremendous amount of dissent towards the Bush administration. We do, however, rush to the defense of America as a nation.

Yes we do, but in our defense we do not blindly defend politicans just because we are at war, something Americans were guilty off after 9/11. If our politicans do something that we find is a problem, then they mostly pay the price politically if not legally. But then again, we have way more political parties to choose from here than in the US.

As for being closed-mindedness... yep we Europeans have that problem too, but often the debates focused on Europe on these boards dont even remotely touch the areas which Europeans ignore but should not ignore.

Things that Europeans ignore are among other things, power of unions and organized labour and issues of work mobility. These 2 alone account for a big part of the European economic issues, but are rarely touched in the debates in Europe.
I believe that 9/11 was an special situation. National security was thought to be at risk. Weakness or disunity could have made the situation far worse. My big beef with the US is how partisanship often creates bottlenecks and blame-quicksand...offering no solutions.

Then saddly you are one of the few.

I accept the views of Americans quite often, and even resepect them when those views are formed in a logical and informed manner. I am open to quite a few american opinions, as they are often not far from my own. I agreeed fully with the US policy of going after Al Q and Osama in Afganistan and I still support that action. I also agree about US policy of arresting terrorist suspects, I just dont agree on how they do it and what they do with said terrorist suspects. Often the overall idea I agree on, but the method of achieving said goal is often the sticky point.

I also dont accept illinformed and clearly biased chest bashing based on if its American or European. For example I do not respect people touting the American healthcare system as better than the European. An American system that has 40% uncovered, lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality than that of European nations. Unless those comments include some very serious self analysis on the American part, then they are nothing but flag waving and patriotic bullshit. The same goes for most issues on all sides.

I fully admit that Europe has its problems, and issues and I even admit that we sometimes ignore those problems and issues, but what we do not do, is go around taunting our systems as the "best" when they clearly are no where near that. For example is our healthcare systems the best? Hell no, but it is way better than the American version if you ask me.
I absolutely agree on the healthcare issue. The US healthcare situation is horrific. Working in the healtcare industry, I see what hardships lack of universal coverage cause.

I agree.. ME is a whole other ball game, but saddly very similar in some ways.
Agreed.
 
That link proves nothing. No facts, just opinion. Its also extremely right wing and as usual for right wingers missrepresents the facts.

Will you take Forbes? Will it be better currency? Sorry couldn't resist making a white collar joke. I so rarely get to make one.

U.S. Giving Routinely Underestimated - Forbes.com

-- The U.S. government is frequently maligned for contributing only about 0.16% of its gross national income to development assistance--usually the most parsimonious figure among DAC members. However, U.S. private agency grants tallied by the DAC represent 2.1 cents per capita, ranking the generosity of U.S. citizens below only the people of Norway, Ireland and Switzerland.

Carol Adelman of the Hudson Institute has compiled the highest estimates of private U.S. aid. However, her methodology has sparked controversy for including activities that may not qualify as aid. Adelman's most recent estimate puts U.S. private assistance for developing countries at $62.1 billion, over three times the size of Washington's official aid. While her figures for private voluntary organizations roughly track the DAC's figures, Adelman also includes contributions made by:

-- Private foundations ($3.3 billion);

-- Corporations ($2.7 billion);

-- Universities providing scholarships that support students from developing countries ($2.3 billion);

-- Religious organizations ($7.5 billion); and

-- Worker remittances to family and communities in their home countries ($40.1 billion).

Excluding remittances, which may not qualify as aid, the Hudson Institute's estimates suggest that U.S. private giving in 2003 totaled $22.1 billion. The figure exceeds the $16.3 billion in official aid that year.
 
That's OK. Perhaps I should spend more time in the European Forum, to learn more about what's happening over there.

Not much happening there really.

Truthfully, though, to many of us Americans, it is more complicated, when you talk of several political parties, coalition governments, and how liberal and leftist, and conservative and rightwing don't always match up. Volker and Maximus gave me a couple of links that were somewhat helpful.

So Americans find it complicated when there are more than 2 parties? Coalition goverments have existed almost since the first day of elected democracies heh.

Some Americans say they hate government. What they mean is that they hate the current government. Government is necessary to avoid anarchy and chaos. Most Americans recognize this. Often, dislike of governmental policy is expressed in overly strong terms. If you read posts by Americans here, I think you'll find that nearly all, even if they dislike the current administration, do not advocate the abolishment of government nor are anti-American, though there are some on this board who would claim that disagreeing with the government equates to being anti-American. These are foolish extremists that represent a small, irrelevant minority.

I agree, but as I see it often the debate shows an unnatural hatred towards the civil servant part of goverment, when its more than often the elected officials fault that something is going wrong in goverment. Take Medicare or social security. Its not the civil servants fault that they are failing but the elected officials (aka politicans) who have gutted both systems over years, for personal or political reasons. In fact studies have shown (if i remember right) that medicare is more effective and cheaper in administration costs and running than most HMOs...


I know, for myself, I seldom initiate any debate around the EU...I tend to address individual countries. Any statements I make about the EU are responses to European posters. I think that the generalizations that each 'side' makes is different. Americans often generalize what happens in one European country happens in another. Europeans seem to generalize that what the American government says is what all Americans adhere to. Neither of these statements are accurate.

yep, even I am guilty of that at times. However Americans tend to feel offended of any critical comments that hit their goverment or politicans, and take it as a general attack on the US it self. Look at the Iraq debate. That is Bush's war, and Bush's policies, but time and time again right wingers "defend" the policies and war based on "we americans".

All Americans consider terrorism to be the only world problem worth addressing.

Dont agree that non americans generalise about that. And even if we do, then it does have some merit. US policy in the war on terror has erroded basic human rights and the rule of law, and to me it seems that most Americans are agree with said policies.

All Americans support each and every action by Israel without question.

Would not say all, but quite a few and even a majority. The posts on these boards prove that. Irrational support for Isreal over and over again, no balance from the US side.

All Americans believe that everything in America is vastly superior to everything anywhere else
.

And that is not true? At least on these boards its almost true... Instead of all, then a large part :)

Lots of absolutist statements, that are often rendered either because of stereotyping or because of what our media says. Always take American media with a grain of salt.

American media forms the opinions of the US public, and that in term forms US policy down the road and that effects the rest of the world. We saw this after 9/11.

I understand what you are saying here; I don't agree, fully, however. It's true that Bush policies have been a major reason why there has been a negative reaction towards America. Yet what Europeans don't seem to get is that doesn't necessitate a negative reaction towards Americans. We here do not, necessarily rush to the defense of our leaders. Contrarily, there is a tremendous amount of dissent towards the Bush administration. We do, however, rush to the defense of America as a nation.

I agree that not all americans rush to the defense of Bush anymore, but quite a few hardcore Bushies still do. But when Chavez made fun of Bush at the UN, then bang most Americans were behind Bush all of a sudden.

I believe that 9/11 was an special situation. National security was thought to be at risk. Weakness or disunity could have made the situation far worse. My big beef with the US is how partisanship often creates bottlenecks and blame-quicksand...offering no solutions.

9/11 was not a special situation. It was a terrorist attack, pure an simple. One of many. What was special is how the US, people, but especially media and politicans reacted to the situation, in a very bad way if you ask me. Compare it to the Madrid and London bombings, and compare to how those 2 nations reacted to those attacks.

I absolutely agree on the healthcare issue. The US healthcare situation is horrific. Working in the healtcare industry, I see what hardships lack of universal coverage cause.

Refreshing to hear :cool:
 
Ah, the irony -- Europeans who march in complete lockstep with one another and for whom political discourse takes the form of parroting the dominant platitudes of the day, all criticizing Americans for being "brainwashed".

I would think that in a forum where there is a world of difference between the views of the various American posters and with only one or two exceptions, almost no difference whatsoever among the Europeans, I would think anybody with a bit of intelligence would realize that were a group of people to exhibit signs of brainwashing, such would be manifested through uniformity of opinion rather than the decided lack thereof.
 
That link proves nothing. No facts, just opinion. Its also extremely right wing and as usual for right wingers missrepresents the facts.

What about Forbes? Will you take that currency? lol . Were you part of the Americal Division?
 
That link proves nothing. No facts, just opinion. Its also extremely right wing and as usual for right wingers missrepresents the facts.

That link says quite clearly that the U.S. gives a quarter of a trillion dollars a year, opinion journal is an offshoot of the wall street journal are you accusing them of printing false figures, anyways here's another source that says the same exact thing:

A large majority of U.S. citizens give money away: Approximately three out of four families make charitable donations each year. The average amount given by these families is $1,800, or about 3.5 percent of household income. And contrary to what one might think, it is not true that American giving goes all–or even mostly–to churches. About a third of individual gifts go toward religious activities, such as support for houses of worship. The rest goes to secular activities, such as education, health, and social welfare. All together, private charitable donations in the United States add up to a quarter trillion dollars a year.

USNews.com: Opinion: Michael Barone: Barone Blog: Bookshelf

Here's another one:

The number of American’s employed by non-profits has doubled over the past 25 years. Fueling growth in the non-profit sector is a burgeoning private philanthropy. The number of private foundations tripled since the early 1990s. Americans, according to the most recent survey, give $250 billion annually to private charity.

Sagamore Institute for Policy Research

And another one:

Last week, 50,000 nonprofit executives participated in Philanthropy Day, an annual event held at locations all across America to celebrate charitable giving and discuss the challenges the nonprofit sector faces in raising money. The event received some attention from the press because of the humanitarian disasters over the past 12 months -- the South Asian tsunami, the Gulf Coast hurricanes and the earthquake in Pakistan -- which have stimulated more than $3 billion in private donated relief from ordinary Americans. And this is only a small fraction of the more than $250 billion that Americans will donate to all charities, churches and other causes in this record-breaking year for giving.

Maxwell School of Syracuse University

And another one:

Adam Meyerson: America is off the charts in how charitable we are compared with other countries, and this has been true from the very beginning of our history. A lot of attention has been focused in recent months on the extraordinary outpouring of generosity to the victims of Katrina. But the $3 billion that the American people gave voluntarily for the victims of Katrina isn’t unusual at all. In fact, the American people give $3 billion to charity every four-and-a-half days. Charity is just part of the character of American life. Americans give about $250 billion a year which, the last time I looked, was about twenty times as much as we spend on sports events, about three times as much as we spend on gambling, and about twice as much as we spend on consumer electronics.

Incharacter.org

And another one:

Statistics

About 70 to 80 percent of Americans contribute annually to at least one charity.
The national average of individual giving is 2.3 percent; in total, low earners gave 1 percent of their income to charity in 2003, while the high earners gave 3.1 percent.
  • According to the American Association of Fundraising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy's annual “Giving USA” report released June 13, 2005, Americans gave nearly $250 billion to charities in 2004, a 3.7 percent increase over the $241 billion contributed in 2003 and a new record for philanthropic giving in the United States. Of that, corporations donated $12 billion, or 4.8 percent, while individuals donated almost $188 billion, or 75.2 percent. Tsunami gifts represented less than 0.5 percent of the total.
Embassy of the United States, Paris - France - Information Resource Center

Shall I go on?

var sc_project=2224982; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_partition=20; var sc_security="addeb5b5";
 
Last edited:
9/11 was not a special situation. It was a terrorist attack, pure an simple. One of many. What was special is how the US, people, but especially media and politicans reacted to the situation, in a very bad way if you ask me. Compare it to the Madrid and London bombings, and compare to how those 2 nations reacted to those attacks.

Compare the ****ing casualties buddy, it was the largest attack on the U.S. since Pearl Harbor, it wasn't just an act of terrorism it was an act of war.
 
Yeah worked out great didn't it??

Listen, I don't disagree that other issues in the world aren't important. They most certainley are, and if you go to the thread in the poll section about, "If you could change one thing by wishing it what would it be"

You can see I voted for education, as I think that is the most important issue, since proper education can lead to the solutions of all those issues you speak of, and terrorism.

But i can't minimize terrorisms importance either because it is a direct act of violence against people that is unacceptable, and if left unchecked.... well we have seen the results.

Yeah, it worked great as hell. Only 3000 people were killed in the WTC attacks, but what has happened as a result and how many people the American army has killed with justification in the attack can surely only be called a genocide.

Yes, finally someone who understand that education is part of the root of the problems we face today.
Branches always grow out again, if you take the tree from the root, its gone.

War on terror is trying to cut leaves.
 
We've actually been discussing why European countries and the United States have such huge ideological differences. One of the main reasons Europeans are so inclined towards high taxes is because they see wealth as always inherited, due to centuries under aristocracies. The US didn't have visible aristocracies leading to more reliance on individualism. Just a little perspective on European-American differences.

Although I agree on that I think the main difference nowadays is the mindset of Americans and Europeans. Americans are very conservative and limited in their way of thinking while Europeans are very liberal.

Whats a more liberal project in world politics these days than the European union?
 
Everything in bold is what I am talking about. Stereotypes and overgeneralizations of Americans that only further arguments and defensiveness. Absolutist statements like 'every American' only foster American dislike of those from European countries. If this is your intent, then keep doing it.

Maybe its overgeneralization, maybe I am just talking about the Americans on this forum, or almost all Americans who are conservative right, or possibly all Americans who voted for Bush.
 
Here we go again. Do you pay attention to American posters, here? There is a large contingent that do not agree with the Bush governmental policies, and yet you have succeeded in annoying them, too, due to your blatent, overgeneralized, stereotypical statements, that constantly bash America. For example, I do not believe that terrorism is the ONLY PROBLEM THE WORLD FACES. In my opinion, education and global health are more important. Yet when you spout your stereotypical anti-American comments, you only create defensiveness and negate your argument by only stating the negatives and refusing to focus on solutions. Blame solves nothing.

Yes yes, what other way is there on this forum? All the threads on this forum always turns into a discussion about the folowing things.

America
America-bashing
Anti-Americans
America wars
America is perfect
Iraq
War on terror
Europe
Europe second world war stuff
Europe anti Americans
Europe trash
Europe is best
Israel
Iran

Did I forget anything? I probably did, but all threads turn into this no matter if its a discussion about music or mass murder in Africa.

This statement is totally absurd, and does nothing but shows your closed-minded anti-American views. So, if something is not posted interesting or positive about Europe, it must be simply rhetoric from a 'war-mongering American'? In other words, unless someone agrees with your viewpoint and only posts interesting or positive things about Europe, you refuse to debate, and will, instead, resort to name-calling? Doesn't sound like a, potentially, successful debating style.

Heck yeah, thats the way Europeans get treated, if they dont agree with what Americans on this forumis saying they are "anti-American".
 
Interesting. I asked a question on the differences in how the world views Britain and France based on the article that you posted and you answer me by making negative statements around the US. 'Badly functioning', 'manipulates it's people', 'personality disorder', 'brainwashed'. This all totally irrelevant to my question. All it does is enhance the observation that you are becoming a 'one-trick' debater, your trick being, 'let's attack and blame America and Americans'.

How about addressing my original question? According to the poll, the view of Britain has slipped, yet the view of France has gone up. What do you all perceive are some of the causes of this?

If you read the thread you will see that I was notthe first one to debate something else.
 
Back
Top Bottom