• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel admits Gaza flotilla raid 'mistakes'

Why the surprise?
It was stated from the beginning that there were crucial mistakes, Israelis in general were furious at the fact that the IDF has sent the soldiers equipped with paintball guns into a war zone, and that its intelligence has failed to alert the navy that the soldiers will be meeting heavy resistance.
However as the internal investigation finds the soldiers are not to blame for the violence, the activists were planning this violence and have initiated it, the soldiers may have been unprepared and didn't know about the intentions of the activists, but they've acted professionally and have shown amazing restraint.
 
For those interested in more details about the internal investigation's results:
Eiland report finds 'mistakes, but no failures' - Israel News, Ynetnews

The report was handed Monday afternoon to the army's chief of staff as well as a number of high-rank officers. Since the Eiland committee was appointed by the IDF, its report deals neither with the state's conduct nor the army's pre-emptive gathering of intelligence, but rather focuses on preparations for the flotilla's arrival.

Analysis of the incident that occurred on board the Turkish Marmara, the report says, led the committee to conclude that the activists on deck had been the first instigators of violence.

At least four instances of live fire on soldiers were noted, though the committee believes there were six in all. In addition, a bullet removed from a soldier's knee shows the Turkish activists had prepared non-military arms to use against the forces.

The first issue probed by the committee was whether the Navy had the chance to stop the ships before they arrived in Israel's territorial waters. It concluded that this was not an option because the Navy has not yet developed such abilities, which take around two years to acquire. The army is discussing the option of doing so now.

Another issue probed was that of intelligence gathered by the Navy and the Military Intelligence Directorate before the flotilla set sail. The committee concluded that the IDF had chosen not to collect intelligence on Turkey and the IHH because the former is considered friendly and the latter unthreatening.

Eiland said this decision seemed correct, but that army officials should have taken into consideration the changing tides of Israel's relations with Turkey in the first months of 2010, which was also the time the IHH began openly discussing the flotilla.

He added that the developing relationship between the IHH and the Turkish government necessitated more extensive research than provided by intelligence sources.

However, Eiland said, even with more research intelligence still would have failed because so much of the violence had been brewing on board the Marmara itself.

Regarding the actual raid, the report found that the Navy had prepared only for "likely" resistance by a handful of activists, and not for a violent attack. Even when the ships neared, and the Navy began to understand it had erred, no new set of plans was formulated.

Eiland said the Navy should have understood that the situation did not match its assessments and stop to reconsider the actions it would take.

Aside from the criticism, the Eiland committee also made use of its report to praise the forces that conducted the raid. "I am glad to say we found a long list of praise-worthy things, and these do not only have to do with the conduct of the commando soldiers on the ship but also with other factors, including the evacuation of victims after the operation," the major-general said.

And in any case, he concluded, there was probably nothing the army could have done that would have led to a vastly different outcome. "We must learn from the conclusions deduced by the investigation and the way I see it, the IDF is trying to do so," Eiland said.
 
How weird is that, the inquiry is finished and yet only today the courts decided to broaden it's scope.
Wow, alexa, you should really consider reading the articles you're replying to.
I'm not saying this because I want to provoke you or anything, whether you believe this or not, but simply because you've completely misunderstood what this article is about.

After the raid on the flotilla, before the Israeli government has decided to launch the Turkle inquiry, the IDF has decided to launch its own inquiry, with no regard to whether or not the Israeli government will launch its own inquiry, to find out what went wrong from the military perspective and improve itself.
So it has given the task to retired general Giora Eiland, and he has led the inquiry into the gathering of the intelligence, the decision making by navy and army officials, and the raid itself.
This investigation by the army has now ended and the OP's article is about its results, not the results of the Turkle inquiry as you've assumed.

The IDF has a reputation as a body that continuously and constantly investigates itself openly and publicly, to improve its effectiveness in the future.
 
How weird is that, the inquiry is finished and yet only today the courts decided to broaden it's scope.

Alexa,

The inquiry that was completed today was the IDF inquiry led by Major General Eiland. That dealt largely with military issues. The inquiry to which Israel's High Court had referred is a separate one, led by Supreme Court Justice Jacob Turkel. That commission will deal with broader matters, including issues of international law.
 
More succinctly, this is a formal After Action Report where a military engages in self-critique. Most Western militaries do this beginning with the platoon level, and it broadens and advances upward as introspection and severity demand.
 
Why the surprise?
It was stated from the beginning that there were crucial mistakes, Israelis in general were furious at the fact that the IDF has sent the soldiers equipped with paintball guns into a war zone, and that its intelligence has failed to alert the navy that the soldiers will be meeting heavy resistance.
However as the internal investigation finds the soldiers are not to blame for the violence, the activists were planning this violence and have initiated it, the soldiers may have been unprepared and didn't know about the intentions of the activists, but they've acted professionally and have shown amazing restraint.

Far better than the "guns blazing lets shoot up some activits with wooden rods" approach that they took. So yeah, i agree, what suprise?
 
color me surprised [/s]
the IDF absolved itself
 
The only mistake Israel made was sending soldiers aboard in the first place & not just using a torpedo.
 
To paraphrase: "I would have to say my biggest fault is that I'm just too good of a person."

I must say Israeli whitewashing is always good for a laugh.

Whats even more amusing is reading posts from people that will constantly make excuses for terrorists..... and while I can get a good chuckle from that now & then it also demonstates just how sick & twisted some people are with there logic these days.
 
Moderator's Warning:
I suggest people make themselves aware of the Martial Law rules stickied at the top of this forum. Some are dangerously close to suggesting others are terrorist apologizers
 
Back
Top Bottom