• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Islamists devour their own Supreme Protector! No respect some people!

Republic_Of_Public

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
343
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
If you play with fire, you get burnt. Labour's reward for 'tolerating' Islam has been infiltration by its orthodox agents:

Islamic radicals 'infiltrate' the Labour Party - Telegraph


I disagree with the good Minister when he says that 'radical' Islam is incompatible with the secularism of Labour. The party has been one of the cult's most famed political sops, which I suspect is the reason many Muslims spit so much bile at Labour for the War On Terror. Hitherto the Muslims were given every assurance that their every need and whim would be tended to, thus they felt extra-betrayed.

We've got supermosques being built, radical schools going unmolested and Sharia Law creeping its way in. Hell, Tessa Jowell refused to launch an enquiry over 7/7 in case the Muslims got even more angry and its Muslim peer threatened to mobilise thousands of seething Islamists onto the streets of London if Fitna got shown in Parliament. Special laws are designed to ring-fence Muslims off from the consequences of their own actions and criticism of their behaviour and aloofness. Ministers allow them to be cruel to animals and women and don't take on Muslims chewing them out for being asked to look out for signs of extremism - even the Prime Minister makes sickly Youtube videos promoting their Religion of Peace, prompted by fear of more terror. Not to mention the cranky Muslim Council of Britain being allowed to advise the government again, despite its links to extremism. The list goes on ad-infinitum.

No wonder the party's so attractive a proposition for usurption, given the sheer lack of work to do to remain inconspicuous.

____________________________________

More superb back-reading:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/58211-left-wing-vermin.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/57094-muslims.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...illing-ordained-god-constituted-muhammad.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/64352-muslim-child-brides-britain.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/61671-over-59-belgians-support-ban-minarets.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/61465-swiss-affair-and-wrath-public-opinion.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/58588-muslims-cannot-integrate-into-west.html
 
Last edited:

Republic_Of_Public

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
343
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Last edited:

Republic_Of_Public

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
343
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Night Thought:


The Amboy Times: The List of Things That Offend Muslims

Perhaps a great deal of Muslims think it's just being logical to take over a friendly governing party as there's a hell of a lot they want to change in a tolerant and diverse society. With Shahid Malik wanting to pack Parliament and government with Muslims - to the extent of an Islamic PM at the crown - it just seems an extension of the current order for both parties involved.



http://www.islamist-watch.org/articles/

But all in all, though, with the genie let from the bottle, it will now be ten times harder to come to amicable conclusions with the latest clash of civilisations occurring on many levels. More Muslims play victim and demand 'rights' without responsibility, with politicians trying to satisfy the hunger by giving out ever more to try and head them off. This hits the sense of fair play for the rest of us, but we get told off for being 'intolerant' for fear of retribution if supplies of priviledges are stilted. (It's not as if the pushier Muslims return the favours by respecting the sensibilities of the host peoples.) I fear for the state of things in 2030 on current trajectory.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom