- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 33,522
- Reaction score
- 10,826
- Location
- Between Athens and Jerusalem
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Washington (CNN)Some in the U.S. intelligence community warn that ISIS may be working to build the capability to carry out mass casualty attacks, a significant departure from the terror group's current focus on encouraging lone wolf attacks, a senior U.S. intelligence official told CNN on Friday.
To date, the intelligence view has been that ISIS is focused on less ambitious attacks, involving one or a small group of attackers armed with simple weapons. In contrast, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP, has been viewed as both more focused on -- and more capable of -- mass casualty attacks, such as plots on commercial aviation. Now the intelligence community is divided.
Meanwhile, the U.S. effort to train rebels in Syria to fight ISIS is having trouble. The few rebels that the U.S. has put through training are already in disarray, with defense officials telling CNN that up to half are missing, having deserted soon after training or having been captured after last week's attack by the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front attack on a rebel site.
ISIS seen building capacity for mass casualty attacks - CNNPolitics.com
How long until Obama gets serious about ISIS? The left is incapable of addressing threats.
You want us to reoccupy Iraq?
You want us to reoccupy Iraq?
Considering we're done the great lion's share of attacking ISIS, not sure what more is beyond a full-blown invasion.
Why don't the surrounding nations do more, ISIS is actually much more of a threat to them.
Considering we're done the great lion's share of attacking ISIS, not sure what more is beyond a full-blown invasion.
Why don't the surrounding nations do more, ISIS is actually much more of a threat to them.
You want us to reoccupy Iraq?
You want us to reoccupy Iraq?
LOL This is the only rebuttal the radical left has. There are ways of fighting ISIS without reoccupying Iraq to levels we did previously. Or maybe we can go back in time and listen to our Generals advice to actually leave a couple thousand troops in Iraq to prevent an ISIS type group from growing.
But Obama had to keep his stupid promises. Putting ideology over country once again.
I want us to occupy what is the defacto state known as ISIS, and in doing so-critically destroy what is obviously a threat.
So you want use to occupy Northern Iraq and Eastern Syria?
I want us to occupy what is the defacto state known as ISIS, and in doing so-critically destroy what is obviously a threat.
So you want use to occupy Northern Iraq and Eastern Syria?
And make Iraq our 51st State?
Washington (CNN)Some in the U.S. intelligence community warn that ISIS may be working to build the capability to carry out mass casualty attacks, a significant departure from the terror group's current focus on encouraging lone wolf attacks, a senior U.S. intelligence official told CNN on Friday.
To date, the intelligence view has been that ISIS is focused on less ambitious attacks, involving one or a small group of attackers armed with simple weapons. In contrast, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP, has been viewed as both more focused on -- and more capable of -- mass casualty attacks, such as plots on commercial aviation. Now the intelligence community is divided.
Meanwhile, the U.S. effort to train rebels in Syria to fight ISIS is having trouble. The few rebels that the U.S. has put through training are already in disarray, with defense officials telling CNN that up to half are missing, having deserted soon after training or having been captured after last week's attack by the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front attack on a rebel site.
ISIS seen building capacity for mass casualty attacks - CNNPolitics.com
How long until Obama gets serious about ISIS? The left is incapable of addressing threats.
And remove the terrorist threat to both us and Iraq.
So you want use to occupy Northern Iraq and Eastern Syria?
If that is where our enemy is, yes. Since thats clearly what its going to take to beat them.
I want to let the generals loose, to destroy ISIS by whatever means they think is best.
They're a lot smarter than me, when it comes to things like "occupation".
What I want is, ISIS gone. Destroyed. Completely eliminated. Wiped out.
Do you have a better idea?
But they were there even when we occupied Iraq, and grew out of our occupation....
They were minor characters until Obama ceded Iraq to them, dismissing them as "the jv team".
Obama acted stupidly when he said this, didn't he?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?