Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Well, since we had a deal.
I posted some clarifications on post 6 also, but here:
ISIS is beheading and burning people. Among signs that show the degree that they are proud to commit such medieval religious acts can also be shown by the superb quality of their videos. They do not want us to miss even the finest detail of such horrific acts as expressed with the finest/smallest digital pixel that took the colors for blood and fire. This shows that their intent to present what they are doing is sound and considering that they have not been stopping then they may continue.
Each time they behead and burn people from various parts of the world the more they provoke a reprisal from military people from those parts of the world. They did not stated that they will stop, so at one point it reaches the boiling point and countries join to go against these medieval bustards.
The repeated pattern is that ISIS have consistently provoked many countries (i.e., asked for it). Now perhaps they may even get what they were asking for.
Subduing them would be bloody and difficult because in their religiously zombified state they do not care if they die. The reverse actually, they think they will be rewarded with heaven if they die in the battlefield. This may be the reason why they provoke their own demise basically, so as they can at last enjoy brief seconds-minutes of mortification, with images ready from their unconscious to portray images of their desire (i.e., asking for it).
But even then, if they are subdued and controlled, the idea to turn them over to Assad is wrong for he is not any better with his cleansing operations. How about we give the territories over to Iraq instead? They are secular and under the influence, and it may be a rewarding sign for cooperating with us?
In return, Iraq has to recognize our independence though! No more good old relationships with Serbia, they ought to move above such dictatorship and cleansing methodologies as were used in medieval times, and create new relationship with healthier countries such as us and other countries in the world.
Ask me more questions if you did not get me again.
Oh, ok. So when you said, "well they freaking asked for it", you were speaking of the Islamic State fighters? And not the Christians being beheaded, right? As to your assertion that Iraq is secular, :doh
Continue...
Now that, I really don't understand. Lol.
As if you would want to lift a finger to stop ISIS if they were executing atheists instead
You just stated that Iraq is not secular and followed it with an emoticon " :doh " Surely an emoticon is not enough! So I asked you to continue and support the statement with references in addition to emoticons.
There is no cause for the savage activity of these people. They have the same justification as the Nazi's did. They are animals, nothing more.
Oh, I see, that's reasonable enough.
Iraq is the first Arab country to be ruled by a Shia government since Saladin overthrew the Fatimids in Egypt in 1171. But Shia rule is deeply troubled, and Shia leaders have been unable to share power in a stable way that satisfies the Sunni, the Kurds and even the Shia community.
The Shia are in power in Iraq
This PM has been a lot more "secular" and inclusive of the Sunnis than his divisive predecessor.
Crusades n stuff!!!! What difference does it make!!! :doh
There is no cause for the savage activity of these people. They have the same justification as the Nazi's did. They are animals, nothing more.
No, they're people. Animals don't behave like they do.
Obama has that lying POS Susan Rice out on the stump claiming the 21 beheadings were caused by a movie carried out by over zealous film critics.
How very ISIS of you. A warped misrepresentation of reality.
1) It has now been proven that the WH knew it was a coordinated terrorist attack within 24-48 hours and yet Susan Rice lied through her pie-hole for weeks after. NEXT.
I've been shot at for my countrymen, I didn't ask to only be shot at only for those who believe in a god. kind of a ****ty thing to say to Goshin.
A little history about the crusades.
for more:
Libya and Egypt launch air strikes against Isis after militants post beheadings video | World news | The Guardian
So lets talk about the Templars and the Crusades, because dawdling on the past will address this current reality.
"At least 21 Egyptians were kidnapped in two separate incidents in the city of Sirte, Libya in December and January. "
If your are not a muslim and still hanging around where these savages ISIS are, you are an idiot.
[/FONT]
[/INDENT]
Oh, I see, that's reasonable enough.
Iraq is the first Arab country to be ruled by a Shia government since Saladin overthrew the Fatimids in Egypt in 1171. But Shia rule is deeply troubled, and Shia leaders have been unable to share power in a stable way that satisfies the Sunni, the Kurds and even the Shia community.
The Shia are in power in Iraq
Until the 1970s nearly all Iraq's political organisations were secular, attracting people from all religions and none. The dividing lines were sharply political, mostly based on social class and political orientation. The growth of religious parties followed Saddam's ruthless elimination of all political entities other than the Ba'ath party. Places of worship became centres of political agitation and organisation.
The most serious sectarian and ethnic tensions in Iraq's modern history followed the 2003 US-led occupation, which faced massive popular opposition and resistance. The US had its own divide-and-rule policy, promoting Iraqi organisations founded on religion, ethnicity, nationality or sect rather than politics. Many senior officers in the newly formed Iraqi army came from these organisations and Saddam's army. This was exacerbated three years ago, when sectarian groups in Syria were backed by the US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar
it's only ****ty if it's untrue. If they had executed 21 atheists, who they hate just as much as christians, he wouldn't have replied at all, much less thrown a fit
It was secular before Saddam:
Thought the US lead intervention would turn Iraq back to that pre-1970's secular era, but it seems the intervention only exacerbated the problem:
References:
The sectarian myth of Iraq | Sami Ramadani | Comment is free | The Guardian
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?