• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Your Bible Translation Accurate?

Daisy

"guide our feet in the way of peace.”
DP Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
62,800
Reaction score
21,035
Location
Down South
Gender
Female
Are the Bible translations you rely on truly faithful to the original Greek texts? In this video, we dive deep into "Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament" by renowned scholar Jason BeDuhn. This groundbreaking book exposes how theological bias has shaped key verses in popular translations, influencing beliefs about Jesus, salvation, and the Holy Spirit.

Jason BeDuhn’s meticulous analysis of nine major Bible translations—including the King James Version (KJV), New International Version (NIV), and New World Translation (NWT)—reveals surprising truths about their accuracy. Which translation did he find to be the most faithful to the original text? And what are the implications for those seeking an unbiased understanding of scripture?

Join us as we explore BeDuhn’s conclusions, including his praise for the New World Translation (NWT) for its literal adherence to the Greek, the restoration of God’s personal name, and the debate over the cross versus the torture stake.


If you’ve ever questioned how translations impact your understanding of the Bible, this video will give you the tools to discern the truth. Don’t miss this thought-provoking journey into the heart of scripture and the complexities of translation.
 
Leaving aside the thorny issue of his particular interpretation of others' particular interpretations, my humble experience of working as a translator is that even translating the instructions for assembling a wardrobe (we lived in a furniture factory town) from Catalan/Spanish to English can be an absolute minefield of words and things you never knew existed.
 
Jason BeDuhn’s conclusion on New World Translation


Jason BeDuhn, an associate professor of religious studies, in his book "Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament", compared the New World Translation (published by Jehovah's Witnesses) with eight other popular English translations of the New Testament
. Based on his analysis of specific passages where he believed translational bias was likely, BeDuhn made the following conclusions:

Most Accurate: He concluded that the New World Translation (NWT) emerged as the most accurate of the translations he compared.

Literal and Conservative: He attributed the differences in the NWT to its greater accuracy as a literal and conservative translation of the original expressions used by the New Testament writers.

Not Bias-Free, but Less Biased: While acknowledging that no translation is completely free of bias, BeDuhn suggests that the NWT is less biased than many other widely used translations, which he argued sometimes paraphrase or expand on the text to align with modern readers' expectations or theological views.

Jehovah's Name in the New Testament: BeDuhn did, however, express concern about the NWT's introduction of the name "Jehovah" into the New Testament 237 times, calling it a violation of basic principles of accuracy in favor of denominationally preferred expressions for God.

It's important to note that while BeDuhn's work has been praised by some for its scholarly approach, it has also been criticized by others who disagree with his conclusions about the NWT's accuracy and his interpretations of certain Greek grammatical rules. For instance, one review of BeDuhn's work argued that he might be operating from a theological liberal viewpoint and that his selection of passages might reveal a bias focused primarily on the deity of Christ. Another critique pointed out that he may have misrepresented or misunderstood Granville Sharp's rule regarding the Greek article.

Google
 

A link to one scholar who disagrees with Dr BeDuhn's statement about the validity of the New World Translation


The linked document is 80 pages long. Take a 'few' minutes to read it before replying
 
Other Christians have other opinions about the accuracy of the many translations available to the English reader

 
Somerville said:
Other Christians have other opinions about the accuracy of the many translations available to the English reader
Click to expand...
Sure they do because they believe in hellfire/eternal torment, the immortal soul, and the trinity...most translations twist God's Word so it will coincide with those beliefs...leaving out the words Hades/Sheol/Gehenna/Tartarus and replacing them all with the word hell...by leaving out God's personal name/Jehovah, thus confusing Him with His Son...they believe this...

 
It doesn't really matter as long as you can understand the point God is trying to get across.

I don't think that there are any translations that completely alter the story of the Bible.
 
Girlpower said:
It doesn't really matter as long as you can understand the point God is trying to get across.

I don't think that there are any translations that completely alter the story of the Bible.
Click to expand...
Many do, in order to support the trinity and hellfire doctrines...
 
Daisy said:
Many do, in order to support the trinity and hellfire doctrines...
Click to expand...
The Bible is pretty clear about the Trinity but if people choose to ignore it that is up to them.

I can jump in a lake and say I'm not wet but that doesn't mean I'm not wet.
 
Girlpower said:
The Bible is pretty clear about the Trinity but if people choose to ignore it that is up to them.

I can jump in a lake and say I'm not wet but that doesn't mean I'm not wet.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is...the word is never mentioned, Jesus did not teach it and the 1st century Christians did not believe it...



The same can be said about hellfire...

 
Daisy said:
Yes, it is...the word is never mentioned, Jesus did not teach it and the 1st century Christians did not believe it...



The same can be said about hellfire...

Click to expand...
I tell you what.

If you can walk on water I will believe Jesus isn't God.
 

Most English translations have significant MISTRANSLATIONS of the ORIGINAL scriptures.
 
Daisy said:
Most Accurate: He concluded that the New World Translation (NWT) emerged as the most accurate of the translations he compared.
Click to expand...

It's NOT a good translation.
 
Psalm 88:1-7, 11-15

O YHWH, the God of my salvation, I have cried out by day and in the night before You. Let my prayer come before You; incline Your ear to my cry!

For my soul has had enough troubles, and my life has drawn near to Sheol [li-sh’ohl לִשְׁא֥וֹל]. I am reckoned among those who go down to the pit; I have become like a man without strength, forsaken among the dead, like the slain who lie in the grave, whom You remember no more, and they are cut off from Your hand.

You have put me in the lowest pit, in dark places, in the depths. Your wrath has rested upon me, and You have afflicted me with all Your waves…

…Will Your lovingkindness be declared in the grave, Your faithfulness in Abaddon? Will Your wonders be made known in the darkness? And Your righteousness in the land of forgetfulness? But I, O YHWH, have cried out to You for help, and in the morning my prayer comes before You.

O YHWH, why do You reject my soul? Why do You hide Your face from me? I was afflicted and about to die from my youth on; I suffer Your terrors; I am overcome.



Psalm 6:2-5

Be gracious to me, O YHWH, for I am pining away; heal me, O YHWH, for my bones are dismayed. And my soul is greatly dismayed; but You, O YHWH—how long? Return, O YHWH, rescue my soul; save me because of Your lovingkindness.

For there is no mention of You in death; in Sheol [bi-sh’ohl בִּ֝שְׁא֗וֹל] who will give You thanks?



Psalm 139:7-8

Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend to heaven, You are there; if I make my bed in Sheol [sh’ohl שְּׁא֣וֹל], behold, You are there.


Isaiah 38:9-11, 17-19a

A writing of Hezekiah king of Judah after his illness and recovery: I said, “In the middle of my life I am to enter the gates of Sheol [sh’ohl שְׁא֑וֹל]; I am to be deprived of the rest of my years.” I said, “I will not see YHWH, YHWH in the land of the living; I will look on man no more among the inhabitants of the world…

…Lo, for my own welfare I had great bitterness; it is You who has kept my soul from the pit of nothingness, for You have cast all my sins behind Your back. For Sheol [sh’ohl שְׁא֛וֹל] cannot thank You, death cannot praise You; those who go down to the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness. It is the living who give thanks to You, as I do today…”


Jonah 2:1-4

Then Jonah prayed to YHWH his God from the stomach of the fish, and he said, “I called out of my distress to YHWH, and He answered me. I cried for help from the depth of Sheol [sh’ohl שְׁא֛וֹל]; You heard my voice. For You had cast me into the deep, into the heart of the seas, and the current engulfed me. All Your breakers and billows passed over me. So I said, ‘I have been expelled from Your sight. Nevertheless I will look again toward Your holy temple.’”

​


Isaiah 7:10-14

Then YHWH spoke again to Ahaz, saying, “Ask a sign for yourself from YHWH your God; make it deep as Sheol [sh’alah שְׁאָ֔לָה] or high as heaven.”

But Ahaz said, “I will not ask, nor will I test YHWH!”

Then He said, “Listen now, O house of David! Is it too slight a thing for you to try the patience of men, that you will try the patience of my God as well? Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.”

​



​



 
Matthew 16:13-18, 21

Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was asking His disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” And they said, “Some say John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets.” He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.”… From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day.


After Yeshua’s death and resurrection, Peter delivered a poignant message. In the sermon he quoted a Psalm of David (Psalm 16:8-11) which included the word Sheol. Luke, the author of Acts, used the Greek word Hades, in its place.

Acts 2:22-32

“Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know— this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power. For David says of Him,

‘I saw YHWH always in my presence; for He is at my right hand, so that I will not be shaken. Therefore my heart was glad and my tongue exulted; moreover my flesh will also live in hope; because You will not abandon my soul to Hades [Sheol], nor allow Your Holy One to undergo decay. You have made known to me the ways of life; You will make me full of gladness with Your Presence.’

Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. And so, because he was a prophet and knew that God had sworn to him with an oath to seat one of his descendants on His throne, he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah that He was neither to abandon to Hades, nor did His flesh suffer decay. This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses.”

Yeshua, the Messiah, would go to Sheol but He would not be abandoned there to rot. God raised Him up, He conquered death and left Sheol behind.
 
As more Evangelical bible translations get closer and closer to the New World Translation the ESV Translation update is no exception.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…