• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Trump Controlling the Political Agenda or Is He Being Played?

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,857
Reaction score
8,337
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Another one of those academic types has provided the NYTimes with an opinion column suggesting the GOP in Congress has been playing with Trump's ego while doing what it wants. The loss of the House, however, may see increasing turbulence in the halls of Congress.

How Republicans Erased Trumpism
G.O.P. congressional leaders used tactics to minimize the president’s influence and maximize their own control over public policy.

Donald Trump has a Congress problem. He can’t get Republicans to promote his policies. And when he forces the issue — as with his border wall — he can’t win their support. But most Americans don’t know that. After all, Republican legislators voted with the president well over 90 percent of the time during the 115th Congress.
(. . .)
Critically, congressional Republicans have adopted strategies that make the public — and more important, his conservative base — think Mr. Trump is in command. To casual followers of political news, the visible evidence from congressional votes and news releases suggests a powerful president leading a loyal congressional party. In reality, Republican legislators have hidden their influence, purposefully disguising a weak president with little clout on Capitol Hill while also preserving party unity.
(. . .)
Republican leaders simply declined to take up legislation that reflected the priority of the president but not their own. There were no votes on immigration restrictions or funding for a border wall, protectionist trade legislation or infrastructure. The Trump budget proposals for the 2017 and 2018 fiscal years requested deep cuts in nondefense discretionary spending. Congressional Republicans quietly buried them and delivered bills both years that increased nondefense spending.

Such “negative” agenda-setting leaves little trace; without a vote, it becomes difficult for opponents or voters to identify or understand what happened. President Trump’s priorities weren’t voted down in the House or the Senate; they were just never considered.

Republican leaders know they’ve lost much of their policymaking capacity. They may soon realize they also can no longer mask the weakness of Mr. Trump.(my emphasis)

Is Trump a weak president, a man who cares more about self-publicity than actually accomplishing anything for America and its citizens? Is Trump being played by The Swamp-dwellers?
 
I think the GOP has been trying to make the best of a bad situation since Trump wasn't the person they wanted representing them in the first place. I suspect it is indeed a matter of them trying to get their agenda items completed through Trump, but the threat of him not being in lock-step with the party was always a potential problem. The issue with the funding for the wall and foreign policy will be tests of how much they GOP is going to follow along with Trump. The big chink in the armor is that there isn't full GOP support for the wall funding, or Trump's foreign policy decisions so if Trump continues to push those items (which he likely will) then the GOP will have to draw a line somewhere.
 
Trumpism was never sustainable. All Congress needs do is wait him out.
 
I think the GOP has been trying to make the best of a bad situation since Trump wasn't the person they wanted representing them in the first place. I suspect it is indeed a matter of them trying to get their agenda items completed through Trump, but the threat of him not being in lock-step with the party was always a potential problem. The issue with the funding for the wall and foreign policy will be tests of how much they GOP is going to follow along with Trump. The big chink in the armor is that there isn't full GOP support for the wall funding, or Trump's foreign policy decisions so if Trump continues to push those items (which he likely will) then the GOP will have to draw a line somewhere.

I dunno mate.

Their purchase of spines is on back order and doesn't seem to be coming anytime soon.
 
Is Trump a weak president, a man who cares more about self-publicity than actually accomplishing anything for America and its citizens? Is Trump being played by The Swamp-dwellers?

There are various roles presidents can play when it comes to the legislative process.

They can be the public salesmen, but Trump is too widely reviled to be effective in that role.

They can be active policy drivers and partners, but Trump doesn't know anything about policy and at this point the degree to which he's even literate is in question.

They can take on the schmoozer-in-chief/whip/charm offensive role, but Trump possesses no charm, has little to no clout, nothing to threaten with or offer, vastly underwhelming negotiation skills, and poor-to-nonexistent relationships on the Hill.

They can drive the party's strategy, but Trump is an idiot when it comes to strategy--see his pre-emptive public ownership of the shutdown that he then forced with zero exit strategy, culminating in a PR disaster and his humiliating cave to Pelosi.

So yeah, he's pretty useless. But it's not because of nameless "swamp-dwellers," it's because of his debilitating inadequacies as a leader, politician, and person.
 
The Republicans control the political agenda at home. Abroad, he is being played by those he looks up to, needs favors from or to whom he is potentially already indebted. This is because he has no policy ideas of his own except vague emotive concepts like 'keep the brownies out' and other red-hat[e] slogans. Trump never had a plan for 'presidenting': he just wanted the title.
 
Back
Top Bottom