• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is this MLK quote

Is this MLK quote Hegelian in conception?

  • 1) Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2) No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

ataraxia

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
48,239
Reaction score
25,519
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I am trying to understand Hegel. So for all of you Hegel experts out there, I wanted to post this thread as a question and a sounding board to see if I am understanding this properly:

MLK once said about the progress of race relations in the US : "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

I looked at that and realized this is based on this assumption that human history of morality necessarily headed towards a particular teleological goal- in this case freedom, or justice. This is sort of reminiscent of a Hegelian conception of the direction of the broad sweep of human history- that it is necessarily bending towards something or other, a sort of teleological end-goal that it is destined towards what Hegel called "The Absolute".

Now admittedly, MLK, as a Christian reverend, probably was thinking more in religious millenarian terms rather than explicitly Hegelian terms when he said this- perhaps taking to heart the Lord's Prayer: "Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven"- a sort of faith that over time, peace, freedom, justice, and other such ideals can be realized in our fallen Earthly world as it is in heaven. A secular version of that, of course, is Marx's reading of Hegel, with his idea of the dialectical materialism leading to a utopia where all those ideals can be realized.

Coincidentally, I saw this video on Youtube as well, talking about the history of manners, and how over the long arc of human history, manners have evolved towards more consideration and care of others, through what the video calls "a long and always unsteady civilizing process". Feel free to comment on this as well:



But all of these sound very Hegelian. Am I correct in understanding all of these as drawing on Hegelian philosophy?
 
Last edited:
Social progress always accompanies tech progress in the long run.
 
I am trying to understand Hegel. So for all of you Hegel experts out there, I wanted to post this thread as a question and a sounding board to see if I am understanding this properly:

MLK once said about the progress of race relations in the US : "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

I looked at that and realized this is based on this assumption that human history of morality necessarily headed towards a particular teleological goal- in this case freedom, or justice. This is sort of reminiscent of a Hegelian conception of the direction of the broad sweep of human history- that it is necessarily bending towards something or other, a sort of teleological end-goal that it is destined towards what Hegel called "The Absolute".

Now admittedly, MLK, as a Christian reverend, probably was thinking more in religious millenarian terms rather than explicitly Hegelian terms when he said this- perhaps taking to heart the Lord's Prayer: "Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven"- a sort of faith that over time, peace, freedom, justice, and other such ideals can be realized in our fallen Earthly world as it is in heaven. A secular version of that, of course, is Marx's reading of Hegel, with his idea of the dialectical materialism leading to a utopia where all those ideals can be realized.

Coincidentally, I saw this video on Youtube as well, talking about the history of manners, and how over the long arc of human history, manners have evolved towards more consideration and care of others, through what the video calls "a long and always unsteady civilizing process". Feel free to comment on this as well:



But all of these sound very Hegelian. Am I correct in understanding all of these as drawing on Hegelian philosophy?


I think you've got that roughly correct. I'm not a Hegel scholar or specialist, but I do have a PhD in philosophy (and am working on one in Theology) and that seems in line with my understanding of Hegel. One further point to make here is that you're probably onto more than you realize by linking the explicitly theological with Hegel's teleology. Hegel's lectures on the philosophy of religion reveal that he likely got his notion of the direction of history and the Absolute from christian eschatologies and teleologies popular in his day (some of which remain popular).

So yeah, I think you've got at least a rough idea what's up here.
 
I don't know if this is helpful, but this is the guy who apparently originated the term. Another reverend.

.
 
I am trying to understand Hegel. So for all of you Hegel experts out there, I wanted to post this thread as a question and a sounding board to see if I am understanding this properly:

MLK once said about the progress of race relations in the US : "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

I looked at that and realized this is based on this assumption that human history of morality necessarily headed towards a particular teleological goal- in this case freedom, or justice. This is sort of reminiscent of a Hegelian conception of the direction of the broad sweep of human history- that it is necessarily bending towards something or other, a sort of teleological end-goal that it is destined towards what Hegel called "The Absolute".

Now admittedly, MLK, as a Christian reverend, probably was thinking more in religious millenarian terms rather than explicitly Hegelian terms when he said this- perhaps taking to heart the Lord's Prayer: "Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven"- a sort of faith that over time, peace, freedom, justice, and other such ideals can be realized in our fallen Earthly world as it is in heaven. A secular version of that, of course, is Marx's reading of Hegel, with his idea of the dialectical materialism leading to a utopia where all those ideals can be realized.

Coincidentally, I saw this video on Youtube as well, talking about the history of manners, and how over the long arc of human history, manners have evolved towards more consideration and care of others, through what the video calls "a long and always unsteady civilizing process". Feel free to comment on this as well:



But all of these sound very Hegelian. Am I correct in understanding all of these as drawing on Hegelian philosophy?

People tend to say inspiring things in speeches and MLK was no exception. However, he challenged this assumption in his letter from Birmingham jail in a section in which he criticized white moderates who said that civil disobedience and protest was unnecessary because equality would eventually come.
 
MLK was a southern Baptist preacher. He stole talking points in his sermons from every speech maker from Samuel Clemens to JFK.
 
Back
Top Bottom