• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is This Guy A Joke or What? [W:33]

Did it ever occur to anyone that Obama really does look like a "skinny ghetto crackhead"?
Not unless this
_Tyrone20Biggums.jpg
Is supposed to look the same as this
dave-chappelle-black-bush.jpg

The clothes makes the man?
 
That is a COMPLETE 100% LIE and you know it...

I guess that makes the 3 people who "Liked" your lying post, justabubba, TheDemSocialist and pbrauer, supporters of lies as long as those lies prop up their political beliefs... Whadda ya say boys?

p.s. don't bother responding Pete, I already know you aren't capable of doing anything else but sticking to that lie because it would clash with your beliefs, and we all know politics always comes before the truth with you.




Take a look at this brief YouTube video, listen close, then come back and tell us all what you hear that creepy Brent Bozell say.

President Obama Looks Like Skinny Ghetto Crackhead -- On Fox News - YouTube

I don't find any humor in what that cretin, Bozell spewed, what I do find is hate and racism, something that the GOP doesn't need to be associated with.

Brent Bozell should have been fired for making that comment, right after it happened. The comment was way over the line.
 
Last edited:
I like how no one has mentioned how Matthews described Newt; its dumb when either side does it and its stupid squared when they both do it.
 
This thread is on crack.
So true, but then are not ALL the pbrauer Media Matters threads? For a long time I never understood how he kept UP the energy to keep posting their crack until I saw this product placement...............:shock:
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stick to the topic, which is not other posters.
 
So true, but then are not ALL the pbrauer Media Matters threads? For a long time I never understood how he kept UP the energy to keep posting their crack until I saw this product placement...............:shock:

face it ... Barack Obama is a chameleon ... he can be what he needs to be depending on the situation ... ghetto crack kid one minute ... vegas comic the next ...

obama - vegas prelude - frame 1.jpg
obama - vegas michelle frame 1.jpg
obama - vegas michelle frame 2.jpg
obama - vegas michelle frame 3.jpg
obama - vegas prelude - frame 2.jpg
 
When you don't have anything substantive to say....MEMES!
 
The nothing like a suggestion that the media could be a little biased to get certain neuticles in a knot.
 
I like how no one has mentioned how Matthews described Newt; its dumb when either side does it and its stupid squared when they both do it.

I agree but there is a difference between Matthews and Bozell beyond their partisanship. Matthews is an opinion guy that should know better than to make stupid comments, but Bozell is supposedly a truth teller who is selling a book that says the media stole the election for President Obama. Its hogwash and deserves to be mocked.
 
The nothing like a suggestion that the media could be a little biased to get certain neuticles in a knot.

Of course it is, and Fox and the MRC are as guilty as anyone of being biased. What gets me is here's this Bozell guy selling victimhood, and the side that always talks about "personal reponsibility" buys that they're victims. He's as bad as Al Sharpton when it comes to peddling that, he just picks a different crowd.

Why don't they start more conservative outlets? Simple -- loss of profit. If someone else was "telling the truth," Fox, the MRC, and countless radio shockers would lose money.
 
Of course it is, and Fox and the MRC are as guilty as anyone of being biased. What gets me is here's this Bozell guy selling victimhood, and the side that always talks about "personal reponsibility" buys that they're victims. He's as bad as Al Sharpton when it comes to peddling that, he just picks a different crowd.

Why don't they start more conservative outlets? Simple -- loss of profit. If someone else was "telling the truth," Fox, the MRC, and countless radio shockers would lose money.

So which news organization is balanced? ... i.e. you can't detect a preference.
 
Of course it is, and Fox and the MRC are as guilty as anyone of being biased. What gets me is here's this Bozell guy selling victimhood, and the side that always talks about "personal reponsibility" buys that they're victims. He's as bad as Al Sharpton when it comes to peddling that, he just picks a different crowd.

Why don't they start more conservative outlets? Simple -- loss of profit. If someone else was "telling the truth," Fox, the MRC, and countless radio shockers would lose money.
It's really up to each of us to separate the wheat (pronounced "hwheat") from the chaff. I don't buy into the bleatings of either liberal or conservative sources that pop up on a daily basis saying incendiary things, and neither should others. I don't buy into everything someone like Brent Bozell says on any particular issue, even though he does have some points to make on media bias. When he drifts afield into political content, he's no more or less a partisan than any other player, and he will say some questionable stuff. So what? There's plenty of crappy stuff said by talking heads to go around for both sides to remain permanently offended.
 
It's really up to each of us to separate the wheat (pronounced "hwheat") from the chaff. I don't buy into the bleatings of either liberal or conservative sources that pop up on a daily basis saying incendiary things, and neither should others. I don't buy into everything someone like Brent Bozell says on any particular issue, even though he does have some points to make on media bias. When he drifts afield into political content, he's no more or less a partisan than any other player, and he will say some questionable stuff. So what? There's plenty of crappy stuff said by talking heads to go around for both sides to remain permanently offended.
'

My own personal opinion -- this particular forum doesn't serve much purpose because of exactly what you said. I would say if you don't like what a commentator said, that could go somewhere else in most cases. Then we can spend more time debating what they said instead of yelling about who's more biased.
 
Notice how i did not say "there are not any liberals on the media". There are certainly liberal commentators but that does not mean the media as a whole is a liberal...

Okay ... what % do you think lean left?
Or maybe it would be easier to simply ask you to name which of the major cable and network news organizations are clearly conservative-leaning.
 
'

My own personal opinion -- this particular forum doesn't serve much purpose because of exactly what you said. I would say if you don't like what a commentator said, that could go somewhere else in most cases. Then we can spend more time debating what they said instead of yelling about who's more biased.
Heh. Well, I'm biased. I don't see anything wrong with what Brent said. It's inflammatory. That's why he said it, and it's no different than calling Palin an inbred cretin or whatever insult the left dreams up for the target of the day or week. The truth is that Obama plays his race to every advantage he can. I don't blame him, but the notion that he's immune from having such things come back on him from time to time is silly. I think the poster that put the image of Dave Chapelle here has it right. It's time to lighten up a little on the race issue. I think the image of Obama as a crack head is pretty funny - it's a lot funnier if Brent stays out of it, but funny none the less. Bush was constantly portrayed as the Mad Magazine character, and I thought that was funny as well. They may be president, but they're still human. That bias exists, and it does, is not a reason in and of itself for debate beyond the admission that it exists. We know the sources.
 
I don't think there is such a thing. The First Amendment is working as intended.

Ah ... yet they all present themselves as balanced.
Now ... what % of folks tuning in think that what they're watching truly is balanced?
Or, alternatively, what % of folks tuning in to Morning Joe, for example, do that to reinforce what they want to believe?
 
Back
Top Bottom