Sauwan
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2006
- Messages
- 275
- Reaction score
- 24
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
I would guess any white person would have difficulty joining their church...Not really. They're not doing anything racist.
I would guess any white person would have difficulty joining their church...Not really. They're not doing anything racist.
Not really. They're not doing anything racist. Promoting the values and morals of your culture is not racist. However calling every black man you see "a worthless n*gga who got away " or calling every white man you see a "former slave owner" is.
Now...about my satisfaction.
How in the hell is it not comparable? Are blacks somehow incapable of racism?
Trajan Octavian Titus said:Sorry but if this were a white senator with an R next to his name you people would be screaming to the rafters.
I would guess any white person would have difficulty joining their church...
They're capable of it, but this isn't a Louis Farrakhan-type group. This seems like a pretty mainstream black church interested in activism for Africa and for fighting racism.
That's because there are almost no "white pride" groups in existence that don't also blame their problems on minorities or do other racist things. That is not necessarily true of all "black pride" groups. Different race, different standard; deal with it.
I dont see why what exacly are they doing that is racist? I believe in promoting all cultures. IF someday there comes the day where the white people in America want to celebrate their european heritage.
Different race different standard? Aww horseshit, this is exactly the same rhetoric you would find on stormfront from the people who say sh!t along the lines of: "why is it ok for other races to be proud but not us, we're not racists yadayadayada," I don't buy that crap from them and I'm not going to buy it from these people either.
What? This group, in its mission statement, mentions slavery. They are unquestionably blaming white people.That's because there are no "white pride" groups in existence that don't also blame their problems on minorities or do other racist things. That is not necessarily true of all "black pride" groups.
Ya it's called the white pride movement, I don't see any difference with this church and them, save of course for skin pigmentation, it's flip sides of the same racist coin.
Oh please the rhetoric from the OP is the same type of bullshit you'll hear from the white pride people who will swear up and down that they're not racist, but in reality that is exactly what they are, I don't buy that tripe from them and I won't buy it from these people either. I don't see color people tell me I'm white and I believe them because I can get a bank loan. lmfao thankyou Colbert.
Not really. The nasties at stormfront aren't really proud of themselves at all,and that is why they spend so much time tearing down others. If you can show that the members of this church are spreading antisemitism, promoting stereotypes about asian people, dissing native Americans, talking about the white devil or anything like that, then I will join you in condemning them.
Otherwise, I think you are making quite a stretch.
I guess I should find out if Whites from Africa are socially accepted there before rushing to judgment. They keep claiming "Black" and only erratically "African". Just seems more about melanoma content than it does culture content from how they word it.I dont see why what exacly are they doing that is racist? I believe in promoting all cultures. IF someday there comes the day where the white people in America want to celebrate their european heritage. Greeks do it. Mexicans do it. Why can't the people of Scottish, Irish, German, Welsh, Italian and Polish ancestry? Aren't their cultures as big a part of America as African Americans and Native Americans are? There is a very clear line between celebrating your culture and being a racist. Sadly racist bigots from all cultures have managed to blurr this line.
Ya it's called the white pride movement, I don't see any difference with this church and them, save of course for skin pigmentation, it's flip sides of the same racist coin.
Actually, everyone on this forum correctly expressed that you were lying. The first paragraph explains it all and clearly shows how this is not a discriminating church.To prove the left's hypocricy.
Again to watch you all dance like puppets.
Absolutely nothing? Sorry but the fact that one of the Democratic frontrunners for their pick to run for President is a member of a black separatist church isn't nothing it's a huge huge something.
I didn't have to lie, I chose to lie knowing how you people would react, IE if it's white then it's racist, if it's black and the darling of the Democratic party then eh, it's "absolutely nothing."
I guess I should find out if Whites from Africa are socially accepted there before rushing to judgment. They keep claiming "Black" and only erratically "African". Just seems more about melanoma content than it does culture content from how they word it.
I didn't have to lie, I chose to lie knowing how you people would react, IE if it's white then it's racist, if it's black and the darling of the Democratic party then eh, it's "absolutely nothing."
As I have mentioned the celebration of one's cultural and ethnic identity is hardly the same as racism that is prevalent when we think of white supremacy groups - ie KKK.What? This group, in its mission statement, mentions slavery. They are unquestionably blaming white people.
Racism is unquestionable. It still happens today to a very large extent. However, how can we give one group a pass while another group gets ostracized? How can we make progress if Whites deny it exists, and Blacks are further separating themselves like this and calling it "ok"?
I don't see this problem being resolved for as long as I live and it really saddens me.
(*He didn't actually say that. I just made it up.)
You just got it backwards is all.
As I have mentioned the celebration of one's cultural and ethnic identity is hardly the same as racism that is prevalent when we think of white supremacy groups - ie KKK.
The white pride movement? I've yet to meet a single person from a x-race pride movement that doesn't hold racist ideals regarding the supremacy of their race above that of others.
You're confusing what these people are doing with racism. It's not racism to promote the values and morals of your race.
The white pride movement condones and goes as far as to blame the actions of all others simply by race alone. This does group clearly does not.How is this different from the white pride movement and christian identity groups? Oh ya skin color and double standards.
Actually, everyone on this forum correctly expressed that you were lying.
The first paragraph explains it all and clearly shows how this is not a discriminating church.
This is a minority group, looking to promote it's ethnic roots. I don't see anything racist about it.
IF you are calling this church racist, than by default St. Patricks day is racist holiday with parades promoting racism. I don't see you bitching about that?
There's a clear distinction between racism and promoting a cultural and ethnic identity.
This is nothing but you trying in desperation to swift boat Obama. Too predictable.
If you do not shun other racial or ethnic groups or have a white superiority complex just because, no, you wouldn't be racist.Oh please it wouldn't be racist for me to promote the values and morals of the white race?
This is clearly a black pride movement so I assume you are agreeing that they hold racist ideals.
Oh please it wouldn't be racist for me to promote the values and morals of the white race?