Hypersonic
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 28, 2013
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 212
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Discuss
...
Discuss
Bravo to you for posting this. I read about this study and found it very interesting and not remotely surprising. I have been kicking the idea around for quite awhile of posting something about akin to this; the compulsion of many to blame the poor for being poor. There are far too many contributing factors to take such a stance. Anyone who has every been down and out can attest to the reality of it's impact on an individual. The responses here should be interesting.
getting out of poverty is not simply "going out and looking for a job."
Way too simplistic an understanding about what creates and traps someone in poverty in the first place. I can't help but wonder if those who hold this view have ever experienced the weight of poverty themselves.
Probably not which is the sad part, but I wonder where are the people who hold those views? Where are they in this thread?
Give it time. They'll show up
I watched 30 seconds of it and turned it off. Within 30 seconds the host lies and directly contradicts and misrepresents the article's hypothesis. The hosts at TYT are lying scumbags. Why haven't you figured that out yet?
Discuss
Discuss
Learned helplessness is one possible outcome that comes to mind. Obviously an extended period in poverty will make anyone demoralized. I've read enough interviews with ex cons to know that in some cases it is possible to rise out of poverty, but in all those cases, they had decent social support. They knew someone who knew someone who owned a custom paint business, or at least they had a place to stay while seeking work. Without any support, the odds of recovering are lousy indeed.
There was very little of these 'handouts' we often hear conservatives in an uproar about, and when there was, it was pretty useless. I sure wouldn't want to be in their situation. Finding so much as an apartment was near impossible. One guy blew the entirety of a few paychecks, while he stayed at a homeless shelter, just on app fees. With a criminal record, forget it. Even if they had a kid, they might have to resort to drug dealing or put up with an abusive spouse.
Especially since some had quite a lot of debt - parole fees, restitution, child support, student loans - it became overwhelming and they'd shift from inability to focus, to emotional breakdown. I would be interested in what the study controlled for, since drug use is also common. Someone goes on a crack spree in detroit for a week? Well, is the addiction or the stress or other factors to blame for lower IQ?
What about Abe Lincoln or the thousands upon thousands of other people who've earned a life for themselves and accomplished the American Dream by pulling themselves out of poverty before there was such a thing as welfare? The rest of your post gives the scenario of an utter failure of self control and accountability....what if I decided to smoke crack, what if I was foolish enough to spend multiple paychecks on application fees, what if I decided to have a child that I couldn't support, what if I decided to commit a felony and go to prison while leaving that child at home, etc...
American dream? It has become a nightmare because of the Republican agenda since Reagan slashed tax rates for the rich and borrowed from foreign banks to cover the shortfall.
What were tax rates on the rich during Abe Lincoln's life?
Abraham Lincoln presided over a society which owned slaves, bought them on an auction block, checked their genitals to be certain they were getting good breeding stock, etc. Right now what the Republican party wants is financial slavery. Oh Well......the common man has gained one thing. They don't check his genitals...just his bank account.
Bravo to you for posting this. I read about this study and found it very interesting and not remotely surprising. I have been kicking the idea around for quite awhile of posting something about akin to this; the compulsion of many to blame the poor for being poor. There are far too many contributing factors to take such a stance. Anyone who has every been down and out can attest to the reality of it's impact on an individual. The responses here should be interesting.
Abraham Lincoln presided over a society which owned slaves, bought them on an auction block, checked their genitals to be certain they were getting good breeding stock, etc. Right now what the Republican party wants is financial slavery. Oh Well......the common man has gained one thing. They don't check his genitals...just his bank account.
Could be......look at Dick Cheney. If that son-of-a-bitch(shoot-a-friend-in-the-face) is an example of normal the seven billion people in the world are in deep ****. His lying to get us into a war with Iraq made him $25 million from his stock in Halliburton. What is the difference in one person having an IQ which differs 13 points higher or lower than someone else? 100 is average. That means there are as many people with an IQ less than 100 as there are who have an IQ above. The reason people are classed poor is the stupid, arrogant, selfish policies of the Republican party during the last thirty years.
There are many millionaires with a sub normal IQ. Finding something to do, working hard, saving etc. has made many people rich. Thanks to the policies of Reagan and the Bushes people with a college degree are working at McDonald's for sub standard wages and no benefits.
Way to answer my question. Keep letting that envy eat you up.
Envy??
I've posted here 20 times that I was a Republican for thirty years, Eisenhower thru Reagan's first term. I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets and a middle class. Now I wouldn't give them enough warm piss to take a pill. All they stand for now is corporations and the wealthy. The good news......they've been found out. They've lost the popular vote is five of the last six presidential elections. If we can elect a majority in the house and maintain the senate we're going to show you what "All Men Are Created Equal" really means. That's Whites, Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Gays, Women, the intellectually challenged, the disabled, the blind etc. There must be something better than 1% having all the money:
![]()
like most of your posts on wealth and poverty, that is completely inane. Its the left that needs a large self-sustaining mass of dependent people to remain in power.
Envy??
I've posted here 20 times that I was a Republican for thirty years, Eisenhower thru Reagan's first term. I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets and a middle class. Now I wouldn't give them enough warm piss to take a pill. All they stand for now is corporations and the wealthy. The good news......they've been found out. They've lost the popular vote is five of the last six presidential elections. If we can elect a majority in the house and maintain the senate we're going to show you what "All Men Are Created Equal" really means. That's Whites, Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Gays, Women, the intellectually challenged, the disabled, the blind etc. There must be something better than 1% having all the money:
![]()
Tax cuts are the key. When Reagan slashed tax rates for the wealthy to levels not seem in 50 years and continued to spend at an increased rate he quadrupled the national debt. That means that he effectively borrowed trillions from foreign banks and funneled it into the coffers of the wealthiest people in the nation:
![]()