spiralintotruth
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2013
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Private
Look at any map published before Jimmy Carter gave away out cana. It says "U.S. Territory, U.S. Canal Zone."
So what. Panama was not a state in this country. Period. Looks like you want to :spin: this thing some more to get the focus off of how foolish you sound. No. We are going to stick with this topic. Panama was absolutely not a state. Point blank. Period. Are we clear on this? If you need further reading I have some unbiased sources for you. Whenever you are clear that John McCain was not born in the United States then we can move on to the next topic.
There you go, who said Panama was a "state." ?
Now your going to have to cut and paste and provide a link where someone said Panama was a "state" so you don't look "foolish."
Why don't you tell us who mentioned Panama and why this person found Panama important.
How was this relevant to the McCain discussion? You were attempting to get the uninformed to believe that the "U.S. Canal Zone" was part of the United States which is simply not true. You also want people to believe that Carter gave away "our" canal. The canal was not ours to give away.The U.S. Canal Zone was sovereign U.S. soil until Carter gave away our canal.
Just as any U.S. naval ship is sovereign territory of the United States.
Disneydude thinks "Los Angeles is a world class city." :lamo
:roll:
Cute.
So then is it safe to assume that you have absolutely no argument to show that I'm wrong?
Obama's mother was an American citizen, and he was born on American soil; ergo, he's eligible for the presidency. I can't believe we're still having this absolutely inane discussion after five years.
You've never been to Texas, have you?
Somebody told me the other day to quite bringing up the birthers, they arent that crazy anymore.
I'm not sure what that means.
Let me make this easy for you...Remember when you came out of left field with this one:
Post #192 at 4:15pm How was this relevant to the McCain discussion? You were attempting to get the uninformed to believe that the "U.S. Canal Zone" was part of the United States which is simply not true. You also want people to believe that Carter gave away "our" canal. The canal was not ours to give away.
Hey...do you need a travel agent cause you're a tripeace
Obama was, by his own admission in a book he authored, a "British subject" because his father was also a British subject; ergo, from a legal standpoint he is not eligible to be the president of the USA.Obama's mother was an American citizen, and he was born on American soil; ergo, he's eligible for the presidency. I can't believe we're still having this absolutely inane discussion after five years.
Obama's mother was an American citizen, and he was born on American soil; ergo, he's eligible for the presidency. I can't believe we're still having this absolutely inane discussion after five years.
Yes she was but she was a little "Red Diaper Baby" slut who got knocked up by a Marxist who wasn't even an American when she was still in high school and only 17 years old.
****ing hell that's uncalled for.
There is literally no level so low you won't stoop to.
Apacherat.
Get this through your head.
He's president.
It's ****ing done.
You continuing this birther crap only makes you look more foolish.
>" Panama offered to the U.S. what is known today as the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty of 1903 widened the Zone to ten miles and more clearly stipulated American sover eignty over the Zone.
U.S. "all ...]
Obama was, by his own admission in a book he authored, a "British subject" because his father was also a British subject; ergo, from a legal standpoint he is not eligible to be the president of the USA.
You seem to be having trouble distinguishing between a Natural Born Citizen and other citizens.
Actually...yes...I have.
Obama's mother was an American citizen, and he was born on American soil; ergo, he's eligible for the presidency. I can't believe we're still having this absolutely inane discussion after five years.
Yes she was but she was a little "Red Diaper Baby" slut who got knocked up by a Marxist who wasn't even an American when she was still in high school and only 17 years old.
Here is the problem that surfaced.
>" But new questions about the status of BHO’s teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunham’s ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunham’s age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.” Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, “She was not old enough to register Obama’s birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates:” The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!”..."<
With a Kenyan father Obama
:roll:Oh Muhammed...stop. You cant and wont win this argument so stop trying.
:roll:
Translation: I cannot counter your factually based argument, Muhammed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?