• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is the left becoming more and more authoritarian?

Is the American left becoming more and more authoritarian?


  • Total voters
    74
What amazes and saddens me so much as an American ideological far rightist is, how can truly the mainstream American right be so antagonized by something like Occupy Wall Street? How can you actually sit there and throw a fit all over a short-lived leftist protest in NYC after decades of never seeing ANY leftist upsurge whatsoever publicly? That sends you into a rage? Really?

Is it so terrible that America have actual leftists out on the streets for once in the last decade? Is that so horrific? I personally think and thought at the time it was both great to see and very refreshing, and I say that as a hard American rightist. I want to see the leftists in the streets. I want to see the Nazis in the streets. I want to see the Communists in the streets. I want to see the religious nuts of all flavors in the streets. I want to see the gays in the streets, the blacks, Anonymous. It's a good thing for society for the ideologies to all have a voice. You cannot actually tell me that the suffocating totalitarianism of the GOP and DNC in America is truly something you enjoy? I think it's terrible and have always thought this.
 

What's the difference? You're taking each and every one of those out of context.

Biden's quote - when he said that to the (almost certainly not completely black) crowd in Danville, VA, did he do so in a way that could be seen as derogatory or insulting to their race? No. However, ALL of Rush's quotes were precisely that: derogatory and/or insulting.

How you can possibly think that Reid's comment is in any way race-baiting, I don't see. There's not even an implication of race in his statement. He's referring to the LAWS that were passed, not race, not in any way at all.

And Pelosi's quote - she's POINTING OUT possible racism by the other side...but I guess in your world, it's racist to point out racism by others.

And then there's Clinton's quote - which was completely accurate (especially in the view of time that older men have). He was simply pointing out just how great Obama's accomplishment was.

In other words, you're comparing apples and oranges. Rush was clearly race-baiting again and again and again and AGAIN, and in the examples you gave, the Dems were not. This is not to say that no Dems ever do - some have...but I suspect that in the modern Democratic party, none of those who have are truly movers and shakers among liberals.
 
What's the difference? You're taking each and every one of those out of context.
Ah... so you're examples are 100% true while mine are taken out of context. :lamo Yeah that's about as much insincerity and intellectual dishonesty that I expected.

Have a nice day.
 

Indeed, and in this thread I haven't heard one leftist defend it. Its because they know its authoritarian.
 

 
Ah... so you're examples are 100% true while mine are taken out of context. :lamo Yeah that's about as much insincerity and intellectual dishonesty that I expected.

Have a nice day.

Ah. So you're going to take the position that Rush's statement "take the bone out of your nose" to a black woman wasn't race-baiting (or outright racist), but the statements by the Dems - which I explained to you, each and every one - are race-baiting?

Seems to me you're not just moving the goalpost - you're pretending that we liberals don't have a right to strive to reach that goalpost at all.
 

Yes, they are.
 
I won't take a position with you since your posts are disingenuous to start out. You can only see one side as a your hyperpartisan posts show.

Seems to me you're not just moving the goalpost - you're pretending that we liberals don't have a right to strive to reach that goalpost at all.
Seems to me you only see race baiting by conservatives, and when confronted with liberal progressive race baiting it's "out of context". Have your posts and views always been hypocritical? This may be a reminder to me why I rarely respond to your posts.
 

Seeing as how you seem to believe that "mentioning race" or "referring to race" or "speaking of historical racial matters" IS somehow race-baiting in the same vein as Rush Limbaugh's obvious race-baiting, then we have nothing further to discuss.
 
Seeing as how you seem to believe that "mentioning race" or "referring to race" or "speaking of historical racial matters" IS somehow race-baiting in the same vein as Rush Limbaugh's obvious race-baiting, then we have nothing further to discuss.

You just lied about what my statements said.... I would rather not discuss anything with you since as I've already stated, your posts are intellectually dishonest and chock full of hypocrisy. Just a tip for you: If you're going to point to conservative race baiting and the logic behind it you should take a look at your own political ideology first as it's sure to get thrown in your face. Your posts met my low bar of expectation and you're correct we've got nothing to discuss since you're only interested in discussing things with others who share your hyperpartisan views. Frankly, I doubt you could add anything worth responding to with such a disposition. Have a nice life.
 
It seems that the OP's definition of authoritarian is "possessing authority that I disagree with because I voted for the other party".
 
It seems that the OP's definition of authoritarian is "possessing authority that I disagree with because I voted for the other party".

[h=3]Progressive Authoritarianism & the Death of Debate[/h]hurryupharry.org/.../stigmatise-shame-and-silence-progressi...Harry's Place


Nov 21, 2014 - Stigmatise, Shame, and Silence: Progressive Authoritarianism & the ... The progressive movements of the early New Left were no different, ...
 

That can really be said about this entire thread, can't it? If you're going point to liberal authoritarianism and the "logic" behind it, you should take a look at your own political ideology first. The mean value of left and right both in this country are turning more and more to authoritarianism, there's no relief in either side.
 

No link to those alleged statements from Rush. Why am I not surprised.
 

Not to mention...if an African American chooses to join a republican administration or supports conservatism, the so-called progressives label them as "uncle toms", "Aunt Jemimas", "oreo cookies", or "strawberries".
 

It's you that is attempting to move the goal posts. And until you post credible links to those alleged statements by Rush, nobody is going to take you seriously. Not that it matters. Rush is a talk show host with no power whatsoever in government. Joe Biden is the damn Vice President of the USA! His statements were certainly racist. As were former president Bill Clinton's. If you really want to get into a war of words over which party has made racist statements, we can bring up a bit more of the democrat party history.....including the likes of the late Senator Robert Byrd, the late Hugo Black, George Wallace, etc.
 
The amount of obvious deciet in this thread is quite stunning.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…