- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
- Messages
- 6,380
- Reaction score
- 2,187
- Location
- Brisbane, Qld. Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Mainly because you are inventing an argument that had nothing to do with what I said.
No, I am presenting an hypothesis to counter your claim.
The case presented was that the texts were manipulated, not interpreted.
It wasn't much of a case.
There was no other source for the Muslim religion.
It was fabricated from the texts of other religions in the area.
Just because some other religion did the same thing does not excuse the fact it was total fabrication, not interpretation,.
As far as I am concerned, they are all phony.
I think they are too, but I assess the texts from the POV of an ancient historian, and they universally reflect the mindset of the society that produced them.