- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Messages
- 12,180
- Reaction score
- 5,918
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I’ve heard Christians say no, but isn’t it the same God, just different interpretations?
I’ve heard Christians say no, but isn’t it the same God, just different interpretations?
I’ve heard Christians say no, but isn’t it the same God, just different interpretations?
Yes, they are just different interpretations of the same basic myth.
I’ve heard Christians say no, but isn’t it the same God, just different interpretations?
If that is the case, where do the Muslims get their info from.
The qur'an
Christians use the Bible
Jews go by the Torah
Someone else wondered, if it is the same God why is it that Muslims cannot drink alcohol, while Christians can?
For all religions men make up the rules, they change them from time to time. Catholics can eat meat on Fridays now, it was not that way 60 years ago.
Which more or less shows they make up their own gods, instead of following the True God...
And yet you are now making the very same “True God” claim that they do! Not one bit of real difference.
Which more or less shows they make up their own gods, instead of following the True God...
You are almost correct. They do make up their own God plus, if you ask them, they follow the one true God.
Just like if i was to ask you, you would say that you follow the one true God.
BTW, Some of those men who make up the rules, that I referred to in my earlier post, are in the Watchtower and Tract Society.
The Jews invented the god, Granted they got most info from the Summarians,
But it is theirs, all the early prophets are theirs.
they have the patient on it.
The Christians stole the God, added more Gods to it,
Changed the rules, ... and turned on the Jews..
Then the Muslims stole the God,
Eliminated the Christian Gods.
Modifies all the stories,
turned all the characters into Muslims, at a time when Muslims did not exist.
Added their own prophet.
changed the rules again,
And turned on the Jews and Christians.
Wrong...we follow where God's Word leads us...
I think if you were to look deeper into it, you would find you follow what the Watchtower tells you is God's word.
The qur'an
The qur'an
Christians use the Bible
Jews go by the Torah
Someone else wondered, if it is the same God why is it that Muslims cannot drink alcohol, while Christians can?
For all religions men make up the rules, they change them from time to time. Catholics can eat meat on Fridays now, it was not that way 60 years ago.
Yes, there is...I follow God's Word even though at times i do not understand the reasoning behind it, I do not make up my own rules...
If that is the case, where do the Muslims get their info from.
Well, all the authors of the various texts would be influenced by the socio-political conditions of their community, hence the differences. You can see this effect throughout the biblical anthology.
Sounds good in theory, however they had no texts,
The reason we know so little about these people is that everyone was illiterate, and nothing was written down.
The only source they had were the previous religions they stole the writings from, and changed them with a Muslim slant.
Dis you even read the differences, some are completely insane.
Back to my original statement.
There was no "interpretation".
It was "Manipulation".
It is true of every text I have studied from the Iliad or the Bible to those of the Romaioi. They always reflect the society that produced them.
The earliest known texts date to the Umayyad period, not too long after the time of Muhammad. Of course they originated with an oral tradition, much like the Jewish texts and even those of the early Christians.
And Christianity did the same thing. I'm not saying they weren't influenced by earlier traditions.
And we can say the same for Christian texts that claim virgin births and sightings of the walking dead.
You hardly present a compelling case.
Mainly because you are inventing an argument that had nothing to do with what I said.
The case presented was that the texts were manipulated, not interpreted.
There was no other source for the Muslim religion.
It was fabricated from the texts of other religions in the area.
Just because some other religion did the same thing does not excuse the fact it was total fabrication, not interpretation,.
As far as I am concerned, they are all phony.