- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 43,262
- Reaction score
- 31,920
- Location
- TN, please help
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
Love your sig.1619 founder plays the race card. So, what else is new?
Love your sig.1619 founder plays the race card. So, what else is new?
I really hadn't thought about it in that way, but can see her point.Is there any doubt that we care more about the strife in a country of primarily white people than in non-white countries and the media coverage reflects that?
Newsception! Sounds like it'd be a decent tabloid too.A Daily Mail story about a New York Times story. Raise you a The World story about a Daily Mail story about a New York Times story.
Nonsense!1619 founder blasts media for racial bias after heavy Ukraine coverage
She claims the attention the conflict has received, compared to other conflicts, demonstrates 'insidious racism' in the media. She also said shock for Ukraine shows racial bias.www.dailymail.co.uk
No.1619 founder blasts media for racial bias after heavy Ukraine coverage
She claims the attention the conflict has received, compared to other conflicts, demonstrates 'insidious racism' in the media. She also said shock for Ukraine shows racial bias.www.dailymail.co.uk
It still is.I thought it was a clown in the thumbnail
It's NHJ, so...no. No other form of argument.
Frankly, the difference between accepting refugees from a country like Ukraine and accepting them from a war torn Middle Eastern or North African country is that you don't have to do the level of security screening on refugees from Ukraine that you do from a majority Muslim country.
She's a member of the Race Baiters Guild. It's her job.Only a pernicious trash human being would look at the brink of WWIII and think about how she can capitalize on it and make it all about her victim-race grift.
She is an asshole.1619 founder blasts media for racial bias after heavy Ukraine coverage
She claims the attention the conflict has received, compared to other conflicts, demonstrates 'insidious racism' in the media. She also said shock for Ukraine shows racial bias.www.dailymail.co.uk
If Rwanda had a madman with a couple thousand nuclear warheads pointed at NATO countries, threatening anybody that gets in his way as he committed war crimes, maybe she wouldn’t sound like a racist moron.I do understand her point, that we certainly do not focus on wars and conquerings in Africa or the Middle East with quite the preoccupation we have with Ukraine. I, for one, relate much more to the Ukrainian plight (probably because of my lineage, my travels and a deeper understanding of European history) than I would the war in Rwanda, so to a great extent there is some structural (institutional) racism baked into this.
That said, this is a huge geo-political event and world peace is very much on the line much more with a fringe war in Sub Sahara Africa. Though she is not wrong, I do think this is unnecessary panty bunching rather than a good illustration of racism. People need to pick their battles. This was a poor choice of a battle on her part as very few people would understand her grievance here.
It’s her hustle. The way she makes money. Nothing more.She's a member of the Race Baiters Guild. It's her job.
There's no actual need to feign outrage.While it is extremely suspect that the media doesn't give a damn about atrocities committed by American allies like Saudi Arabia, this isn't about race but power. Russia is a geopolitical rival, and America will never be happy about anything Russia does unless it's an opportunity to feign outrage over military activity.
And yet actual genocide in other countries that don't directly threaten American political interests make headlines for a week at most. This is only important to American media because the Cold War never ended.There's no actual need to feign outrage.
This is basically a bank robbery with an attached rolling atrocity.
And yet actual genocide in other countries that don't directly threaten American political interests make headlines for a week at most. This is only important to American media because the Cold War never ended.
Perhaps my choice of words was a bit extreme, but I think it conveys the sentiment well. I don't think that Americans' current concern for Ukraine has anything to do with Ukraine or the plight of Ukrainians, but with an ingrained opposition to Russia. That's not to say that Russia shouldn't be opposed, but that there's something very frustrating about seeing people whose eyes glaze over when someone mentions state sponsored murder in Ethiopia or a far right coup in Bolivia suddenly become galvanized by the thought of poor, geopolitically important Ukraine getting actual Russian boots on the ground after over a decade of civil war with Russian minorities. If nothing else, I certainly think that American concern for Ukraine's people is cynically selfish.You're not wrong.
Still doesn't make the outrage feigned.
At first, I'd have agreed with you. But watching the Ukrainians both fight AND clown the **** out of the Russians, I'm a real fan now.Perhaps my choice of words was a bit extreme, but I think it conveys the sentiment well. I don't think that Americans' current concern for Ukraine has anything to do with Ukraine or the plight of Ukrainians, but with an ingrained opposition to Russia.
That's not to say that Russia shouldn't be opposed, but that there's something very frustrating about seeing people whose eyes glaze over when someone mentions state sponsored murder in Ethiopia or a far right coup in Bolivia suddenly become galvanized by the thought of poor, geopolitically important Ukraine getting actual Russian boots on the ground after over a decade of civil war with Russian minorities. If nothing else, I certainly think that American concern for Ukraine's people is cynically selfish.
I will admit, it's always fun to see an underdog rise to the occasion.At first, I'd have agreed with you. But watching the Ukrainians both fight AND clown the **** out of the Russians, I'm a real fan now.
Those other countries don’t have Nukes aimed our way.And yet actual genocide in other countries that don't directly threaten American political interests make headlines for a week at most. This is only important to American media because the Cold War never ended.
I fail to see how that contradicts what I posted. Americans don't care about atrocities in countries that don't threaten our interests.Those other countries don’t have Nukes aimed our way.
I believe it has so much more to do with where nuclear capabilities lie and the strong possibility of a major escalation of war. What happens with NATO and the Ukraine and Russia and the United States could bring the possibility of all out WAR to our doorsteps. What happens in some third world nation in Africa ---- not so much.Is there any doubt that we care more about the strife in a country of primarily white people than in non-white countries and the media coverage reflects that?