Actually, I wrote
an entire article on it on blogcritics.org. Of course the Paulbots came out and tried to claim that oh, it didn't happen, but the articles WERE published in Paul's magazine under Paul's byline...and as a writer, I find it VERY difficult to believe that someone would allow something to be published in his magazine in his name without any clue what's in it.
AND here's what
Dave Nalle - a true libertarian and head of the Republican Liberty Caucus -
had to say about Mr. Paul:
[Ron Paul is] an inflexible ideologue who subscribes to a variety of extremist views which would make a terrible basis for national policy. His interpretation of the Constitution is highly selective. He seems not to recognize terms like “public welfare” and “common good” and rejects the long history of constitutional scholarship and jurisprudence on which most law is based. His understanding of the economy is based on fringe economic theories which most serious economists do not consider credible. As for foreign policy, it’s an area in which Paul has no experience at all and his foreign policy would basically amount to isolationism which would have disastrous economic and political repercussions.
[Ron Paul supporters] completely overlook Paul’s support for the reactionary conspiracy nuts at the John Birch Society and the reprehensible 9/11 Truth movement or the fact that he raises money on white supremacist websites and has the endorsement of racist leaders like former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke, White Aryan leader Tom Metzger and Stormfront Fuhrer Don Black.
I've butted heads with Mr. Nalle on many issues...but in this, he and I agree strongly. If there's one thing I've learned over the years, if two people of diametrically-opposed political outlooks agree on something, they're almost always right.
