• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is physical assault justified if you're being followed?[W:263]

Is physical assault justified if you're being followed? (Public poll)

  • Total voters
    52

You approach and ask questions.

You don't approach with fists swinging.
 
Caine said:
You approach and ask questions.

You don't approach with fists swinging.
Click to expand...

One would think that your correct answer is SIMPLY "COMMON SENSE".

But, for these people it isn't, is it ?!?!?
 

Gray Area ? GRAY F-ING AREA ?!?!?

There is NO DOUBT that a civilized answer to the question is: "NO WAY" is ASSAULTING a person following you ACCEPTABLE .....and, there ain't no "GRAY AREA" involved in the correct answer.

And, the reaction of the Black Racist Swine, and their Black Racist Enabling DEM Lib/Gay turds to the GZ/TM Trial's "NOT GUILTY" verdict for Z, where it was found by CIRCUMSTANTIAL and FORENSIC EVIDENCE that Z was PUMMELED in the face.....and, Z'S SKULL CRUSHED in the CEMENT..... EVEN MORE PREPOSTEROUS.
 
Last edited:
It depends how you are being followed and reasonable perception of threat.

Following from afar?

Following persistently and closing in and not declaring yourself? Absolute iffy area. Who the hell does that? Police or a criminal.
 
year2late said:
It depends how you are being followed and reasonable perception of threat.

Following from afar?

Following persistently and closing in and not declaring yourself? Absolute iffy area. Who the hell does that? Police or a criminal.
Click to expand...

YEP !!! In spite of all the Circumstantial & Forensic EVIDENCE at a Trial where BOTH sides agreed that there weren't any legal improprieties, including the teenage druggie thug's family ...... it IS an " absolutely iffy area" ......and Z shoulda not only been found to be "GUILTY" ....... but the thug shoulda killed Z.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…