- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,391
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I have. So when do I see that scientific PROOF of causation of ANYTHING? LOL
stop telling lies. the best you do is saying It was passed. You have yet to come up with a good argument for why that was done
So you have this proof? Please show us all....I am waiting. LOL
again, since you never ever back up any of your silly claims
WORKS GREAT
ITS JUST A FORM (which you already proved was a lie)
KEEPS US SAFER
why do you pretend we have a duty to back our stuff up based on your pathetic level of evidence
I just did back up a claim. Have you started forgetting things? LOL
what claim? when asked to justify the Wickard decision based on the three possible grounds of legitimacy for a decision you demurred
It was another thread. Must be hard for you to track. LOL
posters who are honest and straightforward tend to be honest and straightforward of their positions. Trolls and those who aren't interested in real discussion tend to play games, don't answer questions, demand other posters go look for their "answers" and so forth. Are you able to make an argument in favor of Wickard that meets any of the three normal tests of legitimacy?
Yes I am. And I did already. Now please show PROOF of causation of ANYTHING. You have been asked several times
Proof of what? I am talking about Wickard being a bad decision, and that your claims about "registration" working great is just complete and total bovine excrement
No I presented clear evidence registration works and why Wickard was a good decision. You made a claim that I need PROOF of causation for my evidence. I asked you to provide such proof for ANYTHING (it does not exist). Why are you evading?
stop lying-saying because Wickard has been around for years is not a decent argument that it was properly passed in the first place. Registration has been a failure in the USA and a failure in Canada
I have provided an in depth analysis of why wickard was right. Your ploy is to keep asking the question over and over because you do not like the answer. So where is that proof you were going to show me? Lol
no you haven't. you keep claiming it was right because its still on the books
Legal gun owners and legal gun enthusiasts owning, legally discharging their firearms isn't the problem, as Chicago is a prime example of.
Why continue to apply the same old tired and failed approaches that don't address, nor fix, the real problem: illegal gun owners discharging illegal guns in illegal settings?
Why not try mandatory federal criminal charges with long incarceration minimums for any illegally discharged weapon?
Legal gun owners and legal gun enthusiasts owning, legally discharging their firearms isn't the problem, as Chicago is a prime example of.
Why continue to apply the same old tired and failed approaches that don't address, nor fix, the real problem: illegal gun owners discharging illegal guns in illegal settings?
Why not try mandatory federal criminal charges with long incarceration minimums for any illegally discharged weapon?
Trump could start enforcing thousands of gun felonies tomorrow by himself.....what is stopping him?
Yes I have in depth. I spent hours on it with you which is why you want to do it again. Why do you keep evading my question? I will just ask it every time you ask me a question
You're lying again. HAS ANYONE SEEN ANY PROOF FROM vegas that
WICKARD WAS A PROPER DECISION BASED ON PRECEDENT, ORIGINAL INTENT or TEXTUALISM
and that REGISTRATION OF FIREARMS IN THE USA has DECREASED VIOLENT CRIME?
Ooooooh. All caps. This must be serious. Lol. So where is that proof of causation you claimed. Oh....and how is the poll going? Lol
I think you have told so many lies you cannot remember the difference between my questions as to why Wickard was properly decided vs why Registration "WORKS GREAT"
Where is that proof of causation? LOL
Its just a form!!
I agree completely
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?