Is it any of your business what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms? (1 Viewer)

[Hatuey]

Well? Awnser the question and then debate please

 

[Flea]

No. It is none of my business.

Why, I wonder then, is their business dragged out into the Public?

 

[davideyoung]

Nope - unless they make it my businesses by flaunting it.

 

[nort_12345]

no it isn't mine or anyone's business what they do. it isn't mine or anyone elses business to take rights away from them either i.e. marriage, military acceptance

 

[Alien Traveler]

no it isn't mine or anyone's business what they do. it isn't mine or anyone elses business to take rights away from them either i.e. marriage, military acceptance

You are 66.7% wrong.

 

[nort_12345]

You are 66.7% wrong.

what's 66.7% wrong?

 

[Alien Traveler]

what's 66.7% wrong?

it isn't mine or anyone elses business to take rights away from them either i.e. marriage, military acceptance

.........................

 

[Skip]

You are 66.7% wrong.

He is 100% right. That would make you... 100% wrong.


Seriously, though, what did that add to the conversation at all? We're here to debate, buddy.

As for the question, no, someone else's homosexuality is no more my business than someone else's heterosexuality. If I see two people slobbering over each other and/or being sexually explicit in public, I'll be offended just the same no matter their genders. If they mind their own business, then I won't care. Why should it be my business.

 

[jfuh]

Nope - unless they make it my businesses by flaunting it.

Just curious, but what would qualify as "flaunting"?

 

[Alien Traveler]

He is 100% right. That would make you... 100% wrong.


Seriously, though, what did that add to the conversation at all? We're here to debate, buddy.

As for the question, no, someone else's homosexuality is no more my business than someone else's heterosexuality. If I see two people slobbering over each other and/or being sexually explicit in public, I'll be offended just the same no matter their genders. If they mind their own business, then I won't care. Why should it be my business.

I see I have to explain in more detail.

66.7% - it is about marriage and military, not sexual behavior.

 

[Light]

i do not care what they do in their bedrooms. I dont really care either way

 

[Skip]

I see I have to explain in more detail.

66.7% - it is about marriage and military, not sexual behavior.

And how is homosexual participation in marriage and the military any of your business?

Just out of curiosity, have you ever served in the military?

 

[nort_12345]

I see I have to explain in more detail.

66.7% - it is about marriage and military, not sexual behavior.

are you saying that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry or serve in the military?

 

[jfuh]

I see I have to explain in more detail.

66.7% - it is about marriage and military, not sexual behavior.

Yet, it's the sexual behavior part that involves into the marriage and military part.

 

[nort_12345]

I see I have to explain in more detail.

66.7% - it is about marriage and military, not sexual behavior.

the only difference between gays and straights are that gays are attracted to the same sex. how can that interfere w/ their performance in the military and the right to get married?

 

[Light]

I agree, i dont think that if gays are allowed in the military that it is going to destroy or threaten anything. Though, granted, i have never served, but i dont see why we should turn away troops especially if we are in a war. err....multiple wars.

 

[Kandahar]

Nope - unless they make it my businesses by flaunting it.

Can I assume that you've never flaunted your heterosexuality by appearing in public with a woman?

 

[Light]

Can I assume that you've never flaunted your heterosexuality by appearing in public with a woman?

perhaps he just isn't a fan of PDAs....i know when i am eating im not usually so much of a fan if a couple near me is going at it.:2razz:

 

[CoffeeSaint]

i know when i am eating im not usually so much of a fan if a couple near me is going at it.:2razz:

Where the hell do you eat lunch????

 

[Topsez]

no it isn't mine or anyone's business what they do. it isn't mine or anyone elses business to take rights away from them either i.e. marriage, military acceptance

Red agree totally; Blue 100% wrong... The congress of the US created policy on the military limiting sexuality in public therefore that is the policy or law for the United States, binding inasmuch that it limits gays public utterance or display of sexuality as a standard of employment for the Department of Defense. As a result of this standard any social public arrangement of gay sexuality is basis for non-admission to military service. I take this standard as the US government's position on gay activity... do what you want in private and in public don't ask or don't tell of sexuality.

 

[nort_12345]

Red agree totally; Blue 100% wrong... The congress of the US created policy on the military limiting sexuality in public therefore that is the policy or law for the United States, binding inasmuch that it limits gays public utterance or display of sexuality as a standard of employment for the Department of Defense. As a result of this standard any social public arrangement of gay sexuality is basis for non-admission to military service. I take this standard as the US government's position on gay activity... do what you want in private and in public don't ask or don't tell of sexuality.

why don't ask/don't tell? why not just allow gays to be in the military?

 

[Hatuey]

Red agree totally; Blue 100% wrong... The congress of the US created policy on the military limiting sexuality in public therefore that is the policy or law for the United States, binding inasmuch that it limits gays public utterance or display of sexuality as a standard of employment for the Department of Defense. As a result of this standard any social public arrangement of gay sexuality is basis for non-admission to military service. I take this standard as the US government's position on gay activity... do what you want in private and in public don't ask or don't tell of sexuality.

Yes because we all know gays can't defend our country. Tell me...other then clear homophobia why is this law allowed to remain? It's one of those stupid things I dont understand. Take the army and buying alcohol for example. You can go to Iraq and get your leg blow off before your 20 but you can't buy beer until you're 21?

 

[Skip]

it limits gays public utterance or display of sexuality as a standard of employment for the Department of Defense. As a result of this standard any social public arrangement of gay sexuality is basis for non-admission to military service.

Why isn't it the same for heterosexuality?

 

[Topsez]

why don't ask/don't tell? why not just allow gays to be in the military?

Gays are allowed in the military... I spent over twenty years in the military and know there are many gays in military service. If you want an honest answer then ask your congressman and senator since they passed the rule and Prez Clinton bit his bottom lip and signed it.

Yes because we all know gays can't defend our country. Tell me...other then clear homophobia why is this law allowed to remain? It's one of those stupid things I dont understand. Take the army and buying alcohol for example. You can go to Iraq and get your leg blow off before your 20 but you can't buy beer until you're 21?

The military is a baromoter of the American people in my opinion and the congress and Prez Clinton agreed that gays should be in the closet. Why did they agree to that position? I don't know for sure but I think it goes like this... strait macho volunteer A types would not find it macho to be subordinate to a gay leader and would leave the Army in groves requiring the government to install a draft to replace the A types. This, in turn would cause hatred toward the gay community when families would have to support gays with their sons and daughters as a result of legislation.... this may result in gays being forced back deep into closets or being killed by those forced to serve.

Why isn't it the same for heterosexuality?

Because hetrosexuality is normal and homosexuality is abnormal in the majority of citizens minds... Look at it like the norm is for everyone to wear clothes but on morning the rules change and suddenly nudists are given equality to clothes wearers... it upsets the norm of the majority... shockingly upsets the norm... could get gay people killed it is so shocking if it caused a draft of straits.... Why doesn't the new congress address it? Congressman Barney Frank, a gay representative says he will introduce legislation in the next congress... yes, there is support on every university and among the youth but ask a Special Forces snake eater if he would remain in service subordinate to a gay and be ordered to a "Dining In" where Col. Smith introduces a same sex partner as his or her life mate... The snake eater exits stage left and you get the notice and the gay Col. is the first to die leading his new recruits.

 

[Synch]

It's none of my business what consentual adults do in private.... or humans and animals for that matter.