• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is intelligent Design a scientific theory?

Is intelligent Design a scientific theory?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 4.7%
  • no

    Votes: 61 95.3%

  • Total voters
    64

I agree the question was poorly worded. But that is neither of our faults. I figured they weren`t asking it right but you can`t blame tecoyah for answering the question as put.


I don`t think there is anything wrong with rephrasing it to make it more clear, or with your original answer. No need for anyone ot get uppity about it. Though I still don`t think he has worded it in anyway that makes your answer invalid.

Better yet can someone explain what this question has to do with the subject at hand? Seems to be going off on an obscure tangent of minutia.
 
Last edited:

First off you take this alot more serious than I do if you think someone should attempt to "save face" in here. I am by definition faceless, this is all about exchange of ideas and nothing else, we are all annonymous in this forum. My attempt to clarify my original remark was simply that, an attempt to clarify what I thought was obvious. I was referring to things like Darwinism which was the subject, not things like tequila, I just assumed you got that, my mistake. Your revised list still shows you cant refute my original statement. As for dismissing some smart ass punk with nothing to add to the conversation that was my mistake too, as a rule I just ignore idiots like that but sometimes I let one annoy me and give them the attention they are begging for. I have never had a productive conversation with you yet but I thought this may be the first time, you started out OK then went south on me, oh well.
 

I suppose then, there is no further point.

So be it.
 
Intelligent Design is just respun creationism, Respun for legal reasons by creationists, and of course necessarily has a designER/god.

 
Last edited:
Intelligent design is a theory, but not necessarily testable, we speculate that there was a creator based on evidence. Likewise, abiogenesis is such the same. We can't prove that it happened nor can we provide a viable mechanism behind it. Science can test to see biomolecule formation in a supposed early earth environment, but even if biomolecules are randomly synthesized this does not prove that they were synthesized or that life arose in this type of fashion. Both are speculations based on evidence and largely reinforced by a person's own worldview.
 
Not enough poll options.

Intelligent design has many aspects all depending on who you talk to. For some intelligent design means a deity made everything, for others it was trans-dimensional beings who made this universe, and still others just regulate it to highly advanced aliens (from this universe just so you're not confused between this and the afore mentioned trans-dimensional beings) that just made humans.

Depending on which definition of "scientific theory" you use at least a couple of these things could be considered as such. At least if you use the loosest definition of it. Going strictly by what "scientific theory" means via actual real hard science then no, it is not a scientific theory. At best it would be a hypothesis. It would only become a theory if we found evidence of some form of life that would have been capable of such a feat. And right now we don't even have evidence of basic microbial life outside of our planet...much less intelligent life.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…