- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No candidate in modern history personally campaigned harder than Trump and less than Biden.
Biden's campaign was simplicity itself. He had lost all early primaries but one - a state he lost in the general election. He didn't hold even 1 press conference and his campaign was simple. Early in the Democratic primary - him losing states - he met with a group of billionaires promising not to change things in ways that would affect their wealth accumulation. Biden then basically went home for the entire election season.
Instantly, the richest people and corporations on earth declared on the television stations, newspapers and Big Tech on the Internet declared Biden would be the Democratic Party's candidate - refusing coverage of any other Democratic candidate - and then attacked Trump incessantly primarily with "unnamed sources said" - often proven lies and never confirmed.
For example, to this day not one person confirmed Trump calling our troops "losers" and everyone present said it never happened - but it was declared fact by the billionaire's propaganda outlets. To the contrary, Biden is on video calling our military personnel actively in a combat theater "dull slow stupid bastards" - which was ignored claiming that it is a funny joke to insult the troops.
Promise Jeff Bezos you won't raise his taxes or cause him problems, and Bezos will have WaPo attack Trump incessantly every day. Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerman he will not upset their massive new wealth accumulation, and they'll even ban Trump supporters for Biden.
Is the Biden campaign tactic of promise the richest people in the world whatever they want and doing nothing else since they control all information outlets the future of politics? I think it is. A very small group of the super rich control all information flow and all propaganda outlets. Why even bother with the peasants because they'll do whatever television tell them to do?
Is campaigning only to the richest corporations and people - while essentially ignoring everyone else - the future of politics?
Biden's campaign was simplicity itself. He had lost all early primaries but one - a state he lost in the general election. He didn't hold even 1 press conference and his campaign was simple. Early in the Democratic primary - him losing states - he met with a group of billionaires promising not to change things in ways that would affect their wealth accumulation. Biden then basically went home for the entire election season.
Instantly, the richest people and corporations on earth declared on the television stations, newspapers and Big Tech on the Internet declared Biden would be the Democratic Party's candidate - refusing coverage of any other Democratic candidate - and then attacked Trump incessantly primarily with "unnamed sources said" - often proven lies and never confirmed.
For example, to this day not one person confirmed Trump calling our troops "losers" and everyone present said it never happened - but it was declared fact by the billionaire's propaganda outlets. To the contrary, Biden is on video calling our military personnel actively in a combat theater "dull slow stupid bastards" - which was ignored claiming that it is a funny joke to insult the troops.
Promise Jeff Bezos you won't raise his taxes or cause him problems, and Bezos will have WaPo attack Trump incessantly every day. Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerman he will not upset their massive new wealth accumulation, and they'll even ban Trump supporters for Biden.
Is the Biden campaign tactic of promise the richest people in the world whatever they want and doing nothing else since they control all information outlets the future of politics? I think it is. A very small group of the super rich control all information flow and all propaganda outlets. Why even bother with the peasants because they'll do whatever television tell them to do?
Is campaigning only to the richest corporations and people - while essentially ignoring everyone else - the future of politics?