it isn't that much different
I'd say a bankruptcy filing has significance, but this point is unimportant, imo. It only came up because you … incorrectly … stated that the city has declared bankruptcy.
>>Oh BS, you have not.
This is in response to my statement that "I've made it clear all along that his party affiliation is irrelevant." I will clarify by saying that I meant it is irrelevant to
me. It's clear that that's what I was referring to, in response to yer repeated and FALSE claims that I, for partisan reasons, give a rat's ass what Earley's party affiliation is. I have said over and over and over that the
elected official who appointed him, who decided he was the person to carry out the administration's goals in administering the city, was a Republican, Snyder.
As I recall, you started this magnificent contribution to political dialogue with yer usual boring rag on Demecrats, saying they're "focused on equality of outcomes rather than equality of process," and that they "created the impression of a problem and then used the division and conflict to build a political party." I objected, and pointed to a few examples of Republican officials who have "created victims."
I never said that Democrats didn't play any role in those effups.
Yer the one who, gee, I think this is one of those wonderful "strawmen,"
you advanced the false claim that I "find only room to blame Republicans." ("Only" should be placed after "blame.") But I don't regret the exchange. You have shown yerself to be an utterly uninformed and irrational critic of Democratic liberalism. I hope others can learn something from yer pathetic exhibition.
>>Who do you honestly think you are fooling?
No one, and it was never my intention to do so. I'm confident yer not fooling anyone either. Yer too clumsy to pull that off.
>>when Early finalized the plan to cut over to Flint River water had he taken the necessary steps to ensure the water was properly treated?
Who cares? You wanna focus on Earley. Guess why? His party affiliation. The water should have been treated. Snyder's people blocked that to save a few bucks. Not complicated.
>>Detroit schools have been terrible for a very very long time, and almost entirely a Democrat run cesspool.
Again, Democrats are often elected in cities with large populations of low-income minorities. Any thinking person rejects yer superficial and worthless "analysis," if you can call it that.
>>Because you were the one that decided to make Flint water a REPUBLICAN issue. You are still trying.
Absolute BS. Snyder and his appointees caused the poisoning. They created victims. I offered it as a counter-example to yer worthless crap about Democrats.
>>These subdivisions seem to matter more to you than most.
Oh yes, of course. Which of these people are, uh, stinking papists, and even worse, which ones are, uh, horrible Tiger fans? Democrats point to bigotry … and RW jerks say, "See! They're bigots for just saying that." Keep it up. Most moderates and Independents will see that for what it is very easily.
>>you are a democrat, so subdividing is in your blood.
More RW BS. No one buys that except other RW hacks.
>>Everyone has your number, mmi.
☺ Well, it is in the phone book.
>>Your denial doesn't change anyone's opinion.
I agree. Who in their right mind would consider yer stupid lies about me and others on the Left to have any credibility to begin with?
>>Is Obama responsible for Benghazi?
Ya mean is he responsible for leading a NATO mission to prevent the slaughter of thousands of civilians in that city by forces loyal to Gaddafi? Yeah, you could say that. On the murdered ambassador, as I've asked before:
What would the Right have said about a Berkeley-educated career Foreign Service officer who started out in the Peace Corps, who was sharply criticized when he was posted at our consulate in Jerusalem for his support of the Palestinians, who played an important role in persuading Obama to go after Gaddafi, and who put the State Department and the CIA in a very difficult position because he insisted on continually risking his life by going out in the streets and working to help the Libyan people … BEFORE he was killed?
Got an answer to that?
>>to you this is an issue that none of the Democrats at ground level could have done anything about?
That's yer strawman. I say Snyder and his people were in charge and made the fateful decisions. They created victims. So you can shove yer crap about Demecrats doing that by design to further their partisan interests. That's repugnant.
