You've begun to recede back .
You've begun to tell non-sense .
Your logic is collapsing .
Your pretext is fragile .
You proved nothing .
You disproved nothing .
Urethra Franklin said:
Prostitution has very little to do with the sexual act itself. It has everything to do with the women either earning money vomuntarily or being enforced into the act by a pimp/slavemaster, and everything to do with men paying for it, either out of convenience (only two hours to kill, not worth cruising the bars) or because they are too inadequate to conduct a sexual relationship any other way.
You allegate that prostitution has everything to do with the woman, So, What's the difference between marriage and prostitution in your viewpoint ? You worsen the picture of the female gender, You consider the female as a sexual tool, Nothing else . And when a man gives a prostitute some money, Does he do this for the God sake ? Does he sympathize with her ? Or to have only sex then he kicks her out . Does this happen in marriage ?
Also, Enforcement of a woman into the act is not considered a prostitution But considered a rape, With the big difference .
Urethra Franklin said:
In your model of marriage, the subservient woman is available whenever her husband wants, rape not even being recognised as a crime within marriage since it is the husband's "right". The woman mustn't enjoy it too much beyond pleasuring her man, as that would surely make her a slut. Man subjugates his woman into keeping house, being a baby machine for him and opening her legs, and in return he'll support her financially. Not only is it a form of prostitiution, but it is the worst kind since it is enforced and institiutionalised.
I can also say that the husband is available whenever his wife wants and this is her right too, STOP looking at the subject from one side, Be objective .
Second, You are suffering from an obscure complete ignorance about Egypt and egyptians, Who did tell you that the wives here don't enjoy as much as their husbands ? Did you do a survey study about the sexual satisfaction among egyptian women ? Also,Tell me the difference between a man with a prostitute and a man with his wife and the difference between a wife and a prostitute in regard to sexual satisfaction .
And why do you insist on such words like "subjugate" ? Why don't you say that the husband and the wife share this sexual act with mutual contentment ?
Urethra Franklin said:
You conveniently ignore my question about why married Egyptian men seem to love gay sex?
Again, You're talking about what you completely ignore, Hey, Wake up, It's me who live in Egypt NOT you, And again, You're talking about individual cases - I don't know where the hell you met them - that can be counted on one-hand fingers and you try to generalize their conduct over the whole egyptian community .
Please, Try to get rid of these rotten putrid illusions nesting in your mind .
Urethra Franklin said:
Try this one. A man and a woman both work and earn their own living. They manage to share this in the context of a loving relationship, each respecting each other's capabilities in the home and in the workforce. You couldn't go for that in Egypt of course, because that would give your woman too much freedom. She wouldn't be there like a slave for you 24 hours a day, and she might just come with you on your trips to the west so you wouldn't be so free to go to gay bars.
Bullcrap and a lot of it, Why do you suppose that ONLY the working wife can obtain the sexual satisfaction, While the non-working wife can not ? Why do you suppose the presence of love between the working wife and her husband and suppose its absence in the other side ? What is the damn relation between the working woman and all this BULLSHIT ?
Again, You base the relation between the non-working wife and her husband on war, strugle and fight, I don't know WHY ?
Tell me, What kind of harm i'll get if my wife works ? And why do i fear that my wife may obtain the whole freedom ( not some of it ) ? She's my love, She's my wife NOT my enemy .
Urethra Franklin said:
Not true. An unmarried woman would be considered strange. A woman who chose not to have kids to pursue a career would be considered odd. An Egyptian lesbian would be incorrectly considered ill, unable to marry her girlfriend and enjoy the same rights as a male/female couple, so of course, she either heads west for freedom or she conforms to a life of pretence and misery.
Egyptian women free?
Listen, A person with a value can feel its absence, While a person lacking a value can not feel its presence .
You accused me of the inability to understand your moral-free civilization, But in fact, It's you who can not understand a community based on morals and ethics .
Your constituency of gays and lesbians has decayed down to a level below the level of animals, Have you ever seen this homosexuality among the animals ? O' Shame .
Are your rights confined only to libido, sensuality and adultry ? What a despicable aim you run after .
Women - here in Egypt - represent 22% of the workforce (and the percent is increasing) and this is not bad for a country from the third world, May this shut you up .
I think that feminism collects women who either passed through a bad experience with marriage, were afflicted with bad husbands and search for revenge, were unsuccessful wives or have nothing to do and love shouting .
Which one of those are you, Mrs Urethra ?