Back in 1991 I recall a ton of White Democrat senators voting against Clarence Thomas. And while a few Republican voted against Thomas, and some Democrats voted for Thomas, you would have thought the vote for the 2nd Black man would have been better than a 52 to 48 vote.
There's your racism only world view lens at it again.
A legitimate non-racist concern:
You really can't be that dense can you? Black women helped Biden win so he nominates a black woman to supreme court.
Again, the problem is that the decision was made to appoint only a black female, and disregard all others.
The vote doesn't matter as much as why they vote the way they do.
During times like this people like yourself tell us who you are. And many times you don't even realize it.
I know who I am. I think for myself, but for some dumb reason, so many people find racism where it doesn't exist.
All we have to do is listen to people or read people and over time they tell us who they are. You're no different.
Believe as you wish.
LOL, damn these projections are so moronic. Why do you people even post here if all you do is troll and troll really badly? You just make right wingers (tot that they need any help) look stupid all time
This thread is a trolling race-bate thread, and logic is dismissed by the lefties. No matter what, they claim racist on the right.
gerrymandering of Congressional districts by the democrats.
No, just partisan like the democrats were in their voting against Republican SCOTUS nominees. In case you haven’t heard, 3 white Republicans, Collins, Romney, Murkowski have stated they would vote for Jackson. A black republican will vote against her. It’s all about partisanship, these votes have always been partisan votes. Qualifications, race, gender, means nothing. Just who nominated them, a Republican president’s nominee will always be opposed by Democrats, a Democratic president’s nominee will always be opposed by Republicans. Most anyway as 3 Republicans stated they’d vote for Jackson’s confirmation.
Are you posts on here lies? Or are you telling us who you are?
can you actually fathom the fact that her race is not the reason why they might vote against her.
selecting someone mainly based on race might not be "racist"but it is racially biased.
What is funny is (if I remember right?) the supreme court once ruled that quota based hiring is illegal. It should apply to political appointments as well.
Skin color is irrelevant to ideology unless you are a Democrat.
Every black Democrat Senator has voted against every white nominee for SCOTUS in the past decade. Every single one.
Apparently all she has to be is not a white male.