I have a previous post in this thread that explicitly says my belief cannot be proved.
No sir, you do not. You only admitted your claim remember, claim couldn't be proven after you were asked to provide proof and fell short. Do you want to show us where you stated it was a belief though? That'd be a great start.
It was always a belief.
Nope, you claimed you stated it was a belief in a previous post. Where is it? You stated no such thing up until pushed against the wall for making claims without proof. Hays, it's embarrassing to see you get destroyed like this. Quit while you're behind.
I have native american blood. Am I lying and committing fraud every time I check the Cracker Ass White Boy Box?
Still don't understand that how a person deals with their ethnicity has no relation to integrity and Warren, Bordeau, Jindal etc are all examples of that? Are you being purposely obtuse?
It was plainly a belief from the start, labeled or not. I applied the label later because you had surprised me by failing to grasp the point.
:shrug: are you A) completely devoid of cracker ass white boy blood and B) seeking social or economic advantage by nonetheless claiming it?
Mia Love changed her last name because she got married.
I have native american blood. Am I lying and committing fraud every time I check the Cracker Ass White Boy Box?
Wheat crackers or saltines?
You still won't show us in what post you stated it was a belief? Keep it up Hays, the lies are getting more and more obvious. :lol:
#326. There are several earlier that disclaim any attempt to prove anything.
So far as I understand things, the point of contention here is whether Elizabeth Warren did or did not intentionally misrepresent her genetic ancestry on a job application.
Further, whether that misrepresentation did or did not lead to a job she might not otherwise have landed.
Why the hell are we talking about other people then?
Did she stop using her legal name because of that too? Again, you're failing to understand the point and it's painfully obvious now that you don't understand simple points. Whatever reason Mia Love used to change her name, the effect was distancing her from her ethnic name. However, that, like Warren claiming she was NA based on family lore, does not reflect on her actual integrity. Neither does Warren being proven right/wrong about her NA heritage. Why? Because these actions are normal for minorities/people who believe they have other heritages. Please stop it, you're getting really silly by repeating the same nonsense over and over again as if you're actually making a point.
Her legal name is Love.
Her legal name is also Bordeau, she stopped using Bordeau and has ignored that her full name is Ludmya. Last time: This. Distances. Her. From. Her. Ethnic. Heritage. Do you not grasp that why she did it is irrelevant? The fact is that it is a decision which is based on her understanding/attachment to her ethnic identity. Likewise, Warren determining she was NA because of family lore is a sign of her attachment/understanding of her ethnic identity. Neither of those decisions call their integrity into question. This is hard for you to understand, I know.
Her legal name is also Bordeau, she stopped using Bordeau and has ignored that her full name is Ludmya. Last time: This. Distances. Her. From. Her. Ethnic. Heritage. Do you not grasp that why she did it is irrelevant? The fact is that it is a decision which is based on her understanding/attachment to her ethnic identity. Likewise, Warren determining she was NA because of family lore is a sign of her attachment/understanding of her ethnic identity. Neither of those decisions call their integrity into question. This is hard for you to understand, I know.
Why on earth would she want to distance herself from her ethnic heritage ?
Is she " racist " against Black folks ?
Or are you trying to imply Conservatives wouldn't support her had she not " Whited up " her name ?
Because that's a little racist too.
Why on earth would she want to distance herself from her ethnic heritage ?
He just thinks she took her husband's last name when she married him so she could hide from her blackness and be more white. You know, that's why all women take their husband's names - so we can pretend to be our husband's heritage. I was born German/Irish, but now I'm Swedish. It's pretty cool.
Her ...
Her legal name is also Bordeau, she stopped using Bordeau and has ignored that her full name is Ludmya. Last time: This. Distances. Her. From. Her. Ethnic. Heritage. Do you not grasp that why she did it is irrelevant? The fact is that it is a decision which is based on her understanding/attachment to her ethnic identity. Likewise, Warren determining she was NA because of family lore is a sign of her attachment/understanding of her ethnic identity. Neither of those decisions call their integrity into question. This is hard for you to understand, I know.
Making it up as you go? Please continue. It's fun to see you lose an argument and then just linger around as if you're making a point.
Still not getting the point and repeating your nonsense? Great. Here, I'll do it too:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?