Throwing accusations without proof is exactly what the "throw crap against the wall and see what sticks" mentality is all about.
No need to resort to smaller words, try better ideas instead.
She claims Native American ancestry; I don't believe her. She claims not to have benefited professionally from her claim; I don't believe her. I can't prove anything, but the issues will remain alive.
And who is keeping it alive? Warren?
Most women, in our culture, on getting married, have their names legally changed so that they first name is that of their husband. It's not mandatory, of course, but it is the most accepted convention, and most conform to it. Are you claiming that Mrs. Love did not do so?
Does she no longer use her legal name Bordeau because she fell in love? Nonsense. I married a person with a very similar culture to that of Haitians and she took on my name and kept hers as well. "Mia Love" distanced herself from her ethnic background in the same manner that "Bobby" Jindal did. However, these are normal things for people raised in countries where they are minorities. They're as normal as considering yourself to be of an ethnicity based on family lore.
He said Mia Love took her husband's name so she could appear more "white".
Interesting. What did it show was in your background?
Probably the Hillary Clinton team.
He's desperate to make a dubious point.
When I google, the site that comes up the most is Brietbart.A long Hillary supporter, no doubt.:lamo
That's funny. When I Google it I see one mention from Breitbart from April. I see more recent ones from US News and World Report, Politifact, and other sites too.
When I google, the site that comes up the most is Brietbart.A long Hillary supporter, no doubt.:lamo
I think he's desperate to disparage Mia Love and Bobby Jindal.
I still can't figure out how they ended up being discussed in a thread about Elizabeth Warren and her ancestry.
So your wife kept her maiden name. Is that supposed to have anything to do with Elizabeth Warren?
Deflection.
Somebody is still sore about not being able to prove that Warren benefited from her claims.
Do you care if she lied about it, meaning that she was falsely seeking racial advantage, harming the credibility of the system of affirmative action while also presumably denying a spot to the next actual minority in line, for her own professional and financial benefit?
I have said from the outset nothing could be proven. You are debating with yourself.
She benefited from the claim of Indian ancestry and now can't substantiate it.
I have provided you with links comprised the detailed history and I'm not going to repeat all that here. The university's 2012 denial, offered in the middle of a political campaign, does not fit well with the contemporaneous documentary evidence.
Your lies are getting ridiculous Hays:
You claimed she had benefited from it. Then when asked for proof, you stated this:
Then when told none of your evidence meant she had benefited from it, you retracted. Quit trying Hays, you're not good at this.
Thank you for making my point. There is no post of mine claiming proof.
I have provided you with links comprised the detailed history and I'm not going to repeat all that here.
I have said I believe she benefited and I have said that cannot be proved.
Still making it up as you go? You claimed that you had already posted the detailed story when asked for proof.
Nope, you stated it as a fact and then failed to provide any proof. Keep trying to weasel yourself out of your statements. It's funny that this is what you've been reduced to. Backtracking on your own statements about what Warren did and didn't benefit from.
I fear you are trying to satisfy some psychological need because you have become irrational.
Proof was never a part of the discussion as far as I was/am concerned, and you will not find the word in any post of mine. The rest is just your fantasy.
Says the guy that Warren benefited, then claims he has proof, tries his hardest to prove it, and then says he never tried to prove it at all. You're seethrough Hays.
Lmao, you mean you make claims without proof? Glad you finally admit it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?