• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Dr. Mary Trump right, or is it not delusional to believe Donald treated unfairly his whole life?

When do you believe Trump began to be treated unfairly & impact to your belief system if since 1970s

  • Trump's 1st big lie has been his, "I'm being treated unfairly," CON he's exploited his entire life

    Votes: 7 87.5%
  • Trump was first treated unfairly- Nixon's DOJ for alleged housing discrimination in 1973 & by Forbes

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • I need the significant unfair treatment of Trump to commence in earnest when he took on Deep State

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trump was first treated unfairly- Nixon's DOJ for alleged housing discrimination in 1973 & by Forbes

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • I need the significant unfair treatment of Trump to commence in earnest when he took on Deep State

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8

post

Lady of the house wonderin' where it's gonna stop
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Messages
19,295
Reaction score
8,601
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed

'Deeply delusional' that Donald Trump has been treated ...

https://www.yahoo.com › lifestyle › mary-trump-deepl...
Sep 17, 2020 — Mary Trump, Donald Trump's niece, joins Lawrence O'Donnell to explain why ... that Donald Trump has been treated unfairly his whole life.

Did two Forbes 400 editors perjure themselves just two weeks ago or was their testimony a unique new argument Trump is who his psychologist
niece, Mary describes him as.... a developmentally damaged, high functioning confidence man running a lifelong, "con job"?
 
Last edited:
Beats me, but from all we have read his family has been mega dysfunctional for a couple of generations.

Certainly Mary would know first hand. Add to that her professional knowledge.

Politics aside, we all can tell by observation he is a deeply flawed person.

As my grandfather would have said, “Something ain’t right about that boy”.
 

Dec 17, 2021, 52,125 views

Forbes Testified Before The Trump Grand Jury Yesterday—Here’s Why We Fought Their Subpoena​

"...After months of objections, on Wednesday, the judge overseeing this grand jury process ordered us to testify, but limited the scope to simply confirm the accuracy of what was in the cover story and the article about the apartment. And so, yesterday we did just that. I testified for about 20 minutes; Peterson-Withorn followed for about 5 minutes....I was questioned by Mark Pomerantz, the former federal prosecutor who Vance brought in to lead the case. Pretty much every question was a simple yes or no. Under oath, I confirmed the following: ....
  • The methodology that goes into our Forbes 400 list of the richest Americans. (He read aloud our 2015 published statement. You can read the largely similar current version here.) And that we apply that methodology consistently across the board. (Trump incorrectly claimed in the story that we somehow have one methodology for him and another for every other billionaire in America.)
  • That of the 1,600 or so people who have been on The Forbes 400 since 1982, none of them, as we report in the article, have been more fixated on their net worth than Donald Trump.
  • That Trump told me that he was worth “much more than $4.5 billion,” our net worth estimate for him in 2015—and, in fact, that he was worth “much more than $10 billion.....”

Inside The Epic Fantasy That's Driven Donald Trump For 33 Years​

https://www.forbes.com › randalllane › 2015/09/29 › in...
Sep 29, 2015 — My overarching question for Trump is a simple one: Does he think FORBES uses a different methodology to value him than it uses for every other ...

"...Despite its name, the organization was not an accredited university or college. It conducted three- and five-day seminars (often labeled "retreats") and used high-pressure tactics to sell these to its customers.[4] It did not confer college credit, grant degrees, or grade its students.[5] In 2011, the company became the subject of an inquiry by the New York Attorney General's office for illegal business practices which resulted in a lawsuit filed in August 2013.[6] An article in the National Review described the organization as a "massive scam".[7] .."

Realty Company Asks $100‐Million 'Bias' Damages

https://www.nytimes.com › 1973/12/13 › archives
Dec 13, 1973 — "Roy Cohn, the lawyer handling the case, said the Government's suit gave no names, addresses or specific incidences of discrimination..."
 
Last edited:
Any rational human being already knew Trump mental issues--------as do his followers
 
Drumpf's grandfather fled Germany during the 1st world war, returned when it was over & was deported back to U.S. A. where he died in the Spanish Flu epidemic. His Father the slum lord was arrested at a KKK rally, He is a "deeply flawed" individual, Mary Trump has his number. He & his other sib screwed her out of most of her Father's piece of the pie.
 
Trump came from an exceptionally dysfunctional family. His acute narcissistic personality disorder is clear evidence that the man had a miserable childhood. He belongs in therapy; not in a leadership role in our government.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/
 
Last edited:

If only they had allowed the grandfather to stay in Germany.
 
I voted twice for President Trump and would do so again in a New York minute.

But, of course, he has a very obnoxious personality that indicates some very big problems as he was growing up.

What strikes me the most is his lack of a sense of humor.

His refusal to attend the Washington Correspondents' Dinner was an example.

He can ridicule other people, but he cannot abide even the slightest criticism of himself.
 
What was it about this humorless individual that prompted you to vote for him a second time? Or did you mean you voted twice in one election?
 
What was it about this humorless individual that prompted you to vote for him a second time?
In 2020, he was the lesser of two evils, IMHO.

Besides, I liked how he was the ONLY prominent American not to kowtow to that "movement" that had caused so much chaos during 2020.
 
In 2020, he was the lesser of two evils, IMHO.

Besides, I liked how he was the ONLY prominent American not to kowtow to that "movement" that had caused so much chaos during 2020.
So it was kinda a Beatles or the Stones, Pat Boone or little Richard, Roosevelt or Hitler kind of question to you?
 
So it was kinda a Beatles or the Stones, Pat Boone or little Richard, Roosevelt or Hitler kind of question to you?
I -- along with others -- could not stomach Ms. Clinton, she with her talk of "deplorables" and having hot sauce in her purse.

And I could not stomach Mr. Biden because of his cognitive challenges and his promise to be the "most progressive" President in American history. (Translation: to be the mouthpiece for woke Dems).
 
Luckily in the case of President Biden, more Americans thought differently, & while more Americans thought the same about Clinton, there was a problem with the EC, which Joe also won.
The Drumpf wasn't the better of two evils, he was just evil.
 
Drumpf's grandfather fled Germany during the 1st world war, returned when it was over
I think you mixed up a few things here.


 
So it was kinda a Beatles or the Stones, Pat Boone or little Richard, Roosevelt or Hitler kind of question to you?
Actually it more of a stormfront, ACLU kind of question for him.
 
Any rational human being already knew Trump mental issues--------as do his followers

having looked at TRUMPs business dealings was pretty certain he was going to be divisive as POTUS and didn't have the skill set necessary t deal w/ difficult issues so I didn't vote for him in 2016 or 2020



as for his followers,... sadly as I see things many of them worship at the alter of money and material goods (which is another reason why I dislike what he represents and endorsed while in the oval office)





yup,... I have to wonder how the nation than put the first men on the moon can have such bad political leadership

basically not happy w/ politicians of either party,... as I see things both major political parties are equally clueless AND not actually displaying what I consider leadership qualities

 
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you because there are two major things no serious contender for the democratic nomination can
do much about before winning the nomination to run for POTUS and one thing after becoming POTUS.

No getting around the need for massive funding, it has to come from somewhere, and the electorate is what it is.... disturbingly far to the
right, on average. In Hillary, 2016, the goal is also to become the first female in history to win a major party's nomination and then win in the general.

After winning, you have to be able to govern, and get things done. All in all, I don't see a better democratic prospect than Hillary in 2016, or
even in 2020....

There is not much Clinton has been incorrect about, (Agnew and Nixon in 1970, "basket of deplorables," in 2016...)
or behind the curve with regard to.

It is just that substance doesn't mean shit to Trump voters, including who they fantasize to be "the liberal MSM".

By Pat Garofalo Asst Managing Editor for Opinion Sept. 11, 2017
".. Any attempt to talk about issues was drowned out by the cacophony of stories about emails..
I wrote shortly before Election Day that Trump actually benefited from having a bevy of scandals from which reporters could choose, whereas Clinton only had one, day after day after day. While Trump's scandals came and went – one day it was..."

Clinton "lost" the electoral college vote in 2016 because of this,

By Pat Garofalo ..Sept. 11, 2017
"..Some reporters, .., take exception to the notion that it was over the top or out of whack. "She was under FBI investigation as a presumptive party nominee. Not sure how that isn't a story," The NY Times' Maggie Haberman said recently. Indeed, the emails were absolutely a story. But how big of a story were they? Not this big:



That chart is from a study by the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University. It looked at what topics during the campaign received the most coverage... conclusions therein is pretty damning for all of us press types:"

Imagine if you were provided a "behind the curtain", pre-2016 election, peek at Trump and the Trump campaign, compared to this one,
(Trump would attempt to block any comparable reveal, even five years later)

October 20, 2016
"...
I’ve now read hundreds of the Podesta emails, ..Many of them show real, determined efforts to find the right solution to some public policy crisis..

  1. Clinton’s ties to Wall Street, big donors: ..They reveal a Clinton certainly more sympathetic to these unpopular actors than she would presumably be on the campaign trail. ..."
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…