- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 85,557
- Reaction score
- 70,823
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I don’t claim to understand what goes through the Russian mind and soul. I’ve tried- and all I have figured out is that it’s complicated.
But from what I understand, Putin is genuinely hugely popular in Russia. So the above polls may be correct, but who said they should care that democracy is on the wane there?
That democracy should be important to people may just be an unfounded contemporary western cultural assumption that is unfounded- whether it relates to Russians or middle easterners or anyone else. I am even even starting to wonder if Americans care about it much anymore either. Things like cultural/religious/ethnic/national identity, pride, and hegemony may be far more important to people. Democracy may be on its way to becoming an obsolete old idea. This seems to be a new world now.
Of course, democracy is NOT increasing in Russia.
In all fairness to Czar Putin, maybe the majority of the Russian people do NOT really want democracy.
Russia has never known democracy, only authoritarian and totalitarian leaders, from the czars to Stalin to Putin.
Russia's bloody history is truly very sad.
(When Russians come to the United States, they thrive.)
Yes, I agree it is a new world. But if you want to change what you have you should look at what is wrong and than make it better. Not worse.
Joey
I don’t claim to understand what goes through the Russian mind and soul. I’ve tried- and all I have figured out is that it’s complicated.
But from what I understand, Putin is genuinely hugely popular in Russia. So the above polls may be correct, but who said they should care that democracy is on the wane there?
Who gets to define what is better or worse?
Talking to, for example, some people here on this debate forum, it becomes quite clear that people have very different ideas of what is better or worse. What makes it difficult is that humans are purely rational creatures. There are a lot of complicating factors that go into their decisions of what is better or worse, including cultural identity, pride, religion, etc...
I was talking, for another example, to some Iranians who support the Islamic Republic there. I was pointing out to them that their country is an absolute economic disaster, a cesspool of corruption and incompetence, that they are now the biggest exporter of government sanctioned terrorism in the world, and they are an international pariah. I suggested that as bad as the Shah of Iran may have been, they may have been doing better as a nation back then. But they patiently explained to me that even though it may SEEM as if the Islamic Republic is not doing well right now, that is only the temporary appearance of things. They patiently explained to me something to the effect that because the Ayatollah's leadership has a special insight into God's eternal and immutable will, they were going to prevail and rest of the world will see that God's plan will unfold and eventually take effect and all will be well. What are you going to say to that?