- Joined
- Oct 6, 2022
- Messages
- 2,652
- Reaction score
- 907
- Location
- SoCal
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Well, then the industry had it wrong. A real gun is always a real gun. Doesn't matter if you use for a movie prop, or a paper weight. The nature of the thing does not change to something else based on whatever changing enviroment it may be placed.The unique reality is that in the movie business a gun is not real gun, or firearm, until it is loaded with live ammunition. Until then it's a prop.
What this then demonstrates, is how some people are unable to process simple high school level logic.
If anyone can be trained to be safe with a gun, so can actors. This sounds very entitled to me, that they are willing to handle a real gun, but unwilling to apply basic common gun safety rules which everyone else are required to apply.And it's not the actor's job to make sure that it isn't loaded with live ammunition. That is for the hired experts to determine. Even if an actor were open a gun, which they are pretty much prohibited from doing, they wouldn't have the expertise to know if they were looking at the backend of a blank, a dummy round, or a live round.
Funny how liberals say this. Liberal anti gun, anti NRA folks will DEMAND laws requiring a homeowner, especially one with small children, to follow required gun storage laws under threat of prosecution, especially if there is a tragedy. But then same folks will say in a case like Baldwin's: "Nope, not my job to make sure a gun is safe"So it's kind of a pointless exercise.
The irony..
Why wouldn't an actor WANT to be extra safe? Maybe we need to have our legislatures pass laws prohibiting film productions from access to real guns? How about that? Not like the left doesn't try to prohibit other people from gun access, maybe they need to ban guns on movie sets?If an actor wants some further reassurance he or she can ask the armorer to check for it again before proceeding. But whatever reason it seems she wasn't around to do so. But other than that they have rely on the expertise of those charged with responsibility of handling those guns and making sure that they are safe
What say you?