• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Iraqi Court: Execute Saddam within 30 days

According to a current Democrat presidential candidate, and the 2004 Democratic nominee for Vice President, Senator John Edwards, he was:

John Edwards, Dove?


Now tell the truth:
Did you vote for John in 2004?
If John the nominee in 2008, will you vote for him??
Oh PLEASE! How can you pretend to not know what John Edwards WROTE in the Washington Post in November 2005?

The Right Way in Iraq

By John Edwards
Sunday, November 13, 2005; B07

I was wrong.

Almost three years ago we went into Iraq to remove what we were told -- and what many of us believed and argued -- was a threat to America. But in fact we now know that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction when our forces invaded Iraq in 2003. The intelligence was deeply flawed and, in some cases, manipulated to fit a political agenda.

It was a mistake to vote for this war in 2002.
I take responsibility for that mistake.
Source: The Right Way in Iraq

To submit a post like you did is quite hard to understand? Note how he used the word MANIPULATED?

I wrote in my previous post "The truth is still the truth." In this instance the truth is that Edwards, like tens of millions of Americans, a majority of Americans in fact felt manipulated by Bush and his henchmen and now feel that the Iraq war was a tragic mistake.

Saddam was not a threat no matter how hard you try to MANIPULATE the truth....
 
To be executed by a authority imposed by the very people who supported him in his crimes. As dictators go, that is unlucky.
 
He is toast-about 15 minutes ago
 
He is toast-about 15 minutes ago
Actually he wasn't toasted...he had his neck broken by the hangman's noose....wonder how long it will take for the video to end up on You Tube?

Do you think the actual hangman's noose will be sold on eBay?

I also wonder what will happen to the body?
 
Actually he wasn't toasted...he had his neck broken by the hangman's noose....wonder how long it will take for the video to end up on You Tube?

It probably is.

Do you think the actual hangman's noose will be sold on eBay?

I'd pay good dime for that.

I also wonder what will happen to the body?

It'll probably be burried in an unmarked grave according to his religions customs.
 
Why do you people always bring up Clinton?
And this differs from you CommieLibs, because...?

For the same damn reason you are talking about John Edwards. On this thread one can tell who support who, and the Repukes is all in denial. Also like me set your *** straight Goodieman, you do not know me well enough to call me a Commie, and I am entitle to mentioned ANYONE that I choose to mention without your permission.

26 x World Champs was 100% right when he said Saddam was not a threat to America. but blabbermouth look at the **** Bush is starting around the globe, and I suppose you support Bush sending our troops to Iraq's killing field huh? Get Real.
 
Interesting the whole "won't shed a tear", notion considering the post originator only knows what the very bais media and the Bush Administration dictated concerning Saddam's reign.

I honestly believed Saddam is learning Spanish about now within South America with enough money from his friends here, to last him his life time.

Interesting how The "hanging", wasn't pictured nor shown via the media.

Just like "terrorist" tapes, that pop up at just the right Republican time (I'm into technology and can do the same with the right software and devices), Saddam is just fine.
 
It's sad the only information concerning Saddam's regime was of negativity and murder. Of course the CIA, headed by George Bush of prior, would never allow his connection toward Saddam's country oil to be a prominent business factor.

A business falling out concerning Saddam and very weathly individuals here, is why he isn't no longer in power.

Considering, the CIA helped Saddam keep his dictatorship for all those years, including the 1983 "murders", he was "convicted" on, it seems I concluded right.

Intersting how the 1983 murders, wasn't a dominant factor during the Gulf War. Interesting how George Bush, allowed Saddam at that time, to NOT be dis-armed politically.

Please, explain to me why Saddam wasn't disarmed, brought up on crimes against humanity, and thus, convicted during the Gulf War?

Don't bother because there isn't any valid legal and HUMANE reasoning.

Oil within Iraq is why. The west needed an oil ally in Iraq and Saddam was it.
 
GySgt,

Most Americans now want out of Iraq for selfish reasons. The majority of the civilian government also makes it decisions based on selfishness. Do you disagree?

Thanks,

I agree with the selfish part, but that's human nature. We still do the right thing many times despite our selfishness, and we will with Iraq.
 
Oh PLEASE! How can you pretend to not know what John Edwards WROTE in the Washington Post in November 2005?


Saddam was not a threat no matter how hard you try to MANIPULATE the truth....

If he's so smart how was he so easily MANIPULATED? A lot of what he said had nothing to do with WMD or the info that was manipulated supposedly.

Saddam was a threat to the stability of the area, and to the oil. He needed to go.

I think it's absolutely terrible that so many Dims who called for the war, are now back-pedaling because it didn't go as planned. They should be ashamed. The Dims did this to Joseph McCarthy as well, many years ago. They plotted with him to go after Commies, but then after he started the process and got totally intwined in it they left him holding the ball. Very unethical.
 
For the same damn reason you are talking about John Edwards. On this thread one can tell who support who, and the Repukes is all in denial. Also like me set your *** straight Goodieman, you do not know me well enough to call me a Commie, and I am entitle to mentioned ANYONE that I choose to mention without your permission.

26 x World Champs was 100% right when he said Saddam was not a threat to America. but blabbermouth look at the **** Bush is starting around the globe, and I suppose you support Bush sending our troops to Iraq's killing field huh? Get Real.

So... you -did- vote for that liar, Joihn Edwards.
And if he's the candidate in 2008 you'll vote for him again.

:roll:

You're all huff, no puff.
 
Interesting the whole "won't shed a tear", notion considering the post originator only knows what the very bais media and the Bush Administration dictated concerning Saddam's reign.

I honestly believed Saddam is learning Spanish about now within South America with enough money from his friends here, to last him his life time.

Interesting how The "hanging", wasn't pictured nor shown via the media.

Just like "terrorist" tapes, that pop up at just the right Republican time (I'm into technology and can do the same with the right software and devices), Saddam is just fine.

.........:crazy3:
 
Interesting the whole "won't shed a tear", notion considering the post originator only knows what the very bais media and the Bush Administration dictated concerning Saddam's reign.

I honestly believed Saddam is learning Spanish about now within South America with enough money from his friends here, to last him his life time.

Interesting how The "hanging", wasn't pictured nor shown via the media.

Just like "terrorist" tapes, that pop up at just the right Republican time (I'm into technology and can do the same with the right software and devices), Saddam is just fine.

Enjoy!

Video of Saddam Hussein being executed - Google Video
 
You'd think that with something as historically relevant as a major tyrant being executed that the cameraman could avoid getting piss-drunk. I saw more of the the floor in that video than anything. You could have faked the moon landing in that video and nobody would be the wiser.

Yeah I've gotten piss drunk while filming wedding videos and I've yet to hear one complaint but this is...wow...
 
That was a really bad video...then you see him laying there for like 3 seconds....good thing they guy know how to hold as damn camera.
 
Yeah I've gotten piss drunk while filming wedding videos and I've yet to hear one complaint but this is...wow...

Yup. I'm in no position to say whether it was faked or not, but as incompetence goes, that video went above and beyond the call of duty.
 
Fairly sure the guy wasn't exactly a professional cinematographer with a nice camera and a permit to be in there. This footage was likely shot on the sly with a tiny camera.
 
Footage = failure.
Hopefully there was another guy taping it and the vid will be out soon.JK.
 
my 6 year old could have done a better job with her cell phone camera.... Not that I'd let her watch that but you get the point
 
Apparently it WAS a cell phone camera that the guy was trying to hide from the officials there, hence the poor quality.
 
Apparently it WAS a cell phone camera that the guy was trying to hide from the officials there, hence the poor quality.

I wonder if it was taped by U.S./Iraqi officials....
 
How was he there in the frist place shouldn't that place be secure and everyone watching each other for anything suspicious...?
 
How was he there in the frist place shouldn't that place be secure and everyone watching each other for anything suspicious...?

Can't cellphones be used to detonate IEDs?
 
Back
Top Bottom