• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Iran's parliament wants Ahmadinejad out (1 Viewer)

This is what one can expect from Jerusalem Post.
Well, I don't want to express, that I do not consider Jerusalem Post to be a valid source. It is a valid source.
 
Typical quote by Volker
(Well, I don't want to express, that I do not consider Jerusalem Post to be a valid source. It is a valid source.)

That is quite funny, first you imply that the Jerusalem Post is not a valid source.
Next post, you appear to have changed your mind.

Do TRY and say what you ACTUALLY mean, it tends to make so much more sense!
 
Typical quote by Volker
(Well, I don't want to express, that I do not consider Jerusalem Post to be a valid source. It is a valid source.)

That is quite funny, first you imply that the Jerusalem Post is not a valid source.
Next post, you appear to have changed your mind.

Do TRY and say what you ACTUALLY mean, it tends to make so much more sense!
I do say what I mean. I did not say in my first post that I do not consider Jerusalem Post a valid source. By checking it I noticed someone could have this impression, I meant this. That's why I made it more clear with an additional post. Now everything should be clear.
 
This does not mean, I want to say it is a valid source :mrgreen:
 
Sure, somehow in a way it is :mrgreen:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom