Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
That is the problem. People like you, though, you in a relatively marginal manner having little direct influence on events, make war more probable. Putin, Chirac and Schröder took a similar line and Saddam was so made believe that he could persist.
PS: BTW it is not "my" suspicion, though, I do tend to believe the iaea is right in its suspicions and have arrived at this opinion by following the developments there in some detail for quite some time.
Interviewing nuclear scientists and full access to all military bases?
So you are asserting that Iran has mixed in their nuclear program with all of their military infrastructure?
Google KUMSC
The worlds LARGEST nuclear weapons storage facility is located on........ Wait for it...... a military base (kirtland AFB, Albuquerque NM).
U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Homeland Security Opportunities
"AIR FORCE BASE
BECAUSE OF A BACKLOG OF WARHEADS awaiting dismantlement at the DOE’s Pantex facility near Amarillo, TX, the Kirtland Underground Munitions Storage Complex (KUMSC) at Kirtland AFB, Albuquerque, New Mexico has emerged as number one in U.S. nuclear warheads deployed in a single location, a rise from 2nd place in 1992 and 11th place in 1985."
Kirtland Underground Munitions Storage Complex Birdseye
Then you have:
Sandia National Laboratories: National Security Missions: Nuclear Weapons
Wait, what? Scientists you say? working on Nuclear weapons, Well I never!
Even if he's right it's dire. Who does anyone think Khameini is going to stick with - outside powers he has already proven he can cow? Or the street mob and other domestic power players upon whom he is dependent for continued power?
Not wanting the thread to end...............................Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon - The Atlantic
How will you guarantee there is no weapons development or existent weaponry, if you cannot look? The Security Council had demanded the inspectors be able to do the job. If they can there need be no war.
Do you think that that is enough? We must live with a Muslim equivalent of North Korea in the Gulf? That will make it interesting, indeed. Waiting for mutual proliferation in the region and almost certainly the use of nukes over short or long.
Sorry Rev, I miss your point.
That's because language has been used concerning military installations "suspected" of working on nuclear weapons!! That language isn't going to fly, and no country would accept it, subjective as it is.
No you don't. but, if you wish to present yourself as unable to grasp basic comprehension in retort to your point, I shall not stop you, sir.
10 minutes means the reaction to first strike leaves no time for confirmation. Technical or human failure become fatal, because the retaliation must be instantaneous.
Iran isn't like other countries.....they lie more, they deceive more, and they falsify information more than any others out there. So mostly anything they say, can't be taken for any grain of salt.
So the language should be specific as to which Bases they will open up and let inspectors in and they will do so without opening their Big mouths.....time for the Sheep to roll over and know their place on the very short food chain they are on.
As most of the Planet won't miss any of them. They do need to start thinking about that fact!
Any country that has nuclear activity is capable of constructing dirty bombs, as such bombs require nothing more than their containing some radioactive waste. Dirty bombs have a localized impact in contrast to full-fledged nuclear weapons. The goal is to prevent Iran from gaining the capability to weaponize nuclear fission (and later fusion).
.........
At present, I favor allowing the diplomatic process to reach its conclusion at the end of June. If Iran rejects an appropriate verification mechanism, the P5+1 should terminate the talks and re-impose the sanctions that had been lifted. Afterward, additional sanctions could be designed and imposed. Then, further non-military and/or possibly military measures would depend on developments.
Thank you. Will you kindly rephrase yourself so that I might understand your point. Unless you don't really want a response from me.
To the bolded. Oh dear lord, never mind MMC. :notlook:
Sorry, if you can't figure it out for real, it would be a chore for me to try to simplify, on the otherhand, if your playing games to avoid the obvious, I'd rather not be the goat.
either way, I don't see the value here.
let me ask you, why are you so desparate to support obama's bad deal with IRan?
Such has been their record Monte.....those mopes couldn't admit to any truth if their very lives depended s
When did people start believing in backstabbing, lying and no good worthless fools?
Oh and I am being kind with the word.....fools. As another much more appropriate term could be used.
I really wish you would explain yourself, I'm not trying to be coy. As to your question on Iran and Obama, there is an agreement being hammered out between Iran on the one side and Germany, France, China, Russia, the UK and the US, on the other, This is not an Iran/Obama deal.
The IAEA was dismissed, ordered out of Iraq the day before the US hostilities commenced in Iraq, But suddenly, the IAEA has relevancy. :roll: I'd still like to see you respond to post 40.
Have UN inspectors had any luck in the Mid East..... EVER?
look at the title of the thread, obstruction has begun even before obama's "deal at all costs".
Nothing equivelent about it, Iran is far more capable, and is in process of it's pan-islamic expansionism. it's in a direct race to establish the ban arabic (land area), caliphate.
Same rhetoric was promoted about Iraq when it was their turn to meet US "justice"!!!!
Yeah tell that to the Iraqis now......as like Syria. It appears Iraq has been split apart.
Iran might want to take notice of that. They wouldn't want the same thing to happen to them.
The Middle East, the graveyard of empires. Continue promoting your American imperialism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?